Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 February 1

= February 1 =

04:43:36, 1 February 2021 review of submission by Bikiransimkhada
Bikiransimkhada (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 09:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

04:47:52, 1 February 2021 review of submission by Bikiransimkhada
I've edited the reference list. Bikiransimkhada (talk) 04:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Unless it gets really big in terms of number of users, it will likely not get an article. Its need have 50-100million users to be valid, i.e. generate sufficient coverage  to supply good references. At the moment, the references as they stand are too poor.    scope_creep Talk  10:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

08:38:21, 1 February 2021 review of submission by Mohammad Hassan Erahimi
I want the re-review to be done because the draft which was written was trying to inform people about a bodybuilding couch in Tehran, Iran and the only purpose of the article was to inform and introduce this person to the people in the country and in the sports industry of Iran and Tehran. This online introduction now is a must because of the current pandemic for career promotions. The material was not against the community of Wikipedia, because no out of the context matter was written there. Thank you in advance. Mohammad Hassan Erahimi (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not social media for people to tell the world about themselves.  See the autobiography policy.  Wikipedia also has no interest in aiding your career, enhancing search results for you, or in helping you "try to inform" people.  Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about something or merely provide information.  This is an encyclopedia where article subjects must be shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources who chose on their own to write about the subject, to meet the special Wikipedia definition of notability. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I need assistance to bring back my draft and submit it as an article. The article is not a self biography. This is the data I have been gathered on this specific person and I have published the data on him as a biography for him. H is one of the bodybuilding couches in my city and my country. I am doing an article him to make people know him. Mohammad Hassan Erahimi (talk) 09:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * For follow up comments, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. If you are not Mohammad Hassan Erahimi, you will need to change your username by making a request at either Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS. As I said, your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further and it will only waste your time and that of others to pursue this further at this time.  You offered no independent reliable sources with significant coverage to support your draft.  Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about someone.  Please read Your First Article.  If you just want to tell the world about this person, there may be alternative forums with less stringent requirements where that is permitted. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

This article was not done by the person himself. This is not an autobiography This article is about one of the sportsman and couches of bodybuilding in my country and my city. I gathered the data myself to prepare this biography on him. Wikipedia doesn't have any article about him although he is well-known in the country and in the city and the gyms as a couch. That is why I wrote the article. Mohammad Hassan Erahimi (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I have requested a username change because I made a mistake and put the name of the article as my username I didn't know this is going to be a problem and this would lead my article to be considered as autobiography!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammad Hassan Erahimi (talk • contribs) 10:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you; that was necessary, but does not change the status of the draft you wrote. I think that you need to learn some more about Wikipedia before you make further edits; once you are renamed, please read Your First Article and use the new user tutorial. 331dot (talk) 10:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

10:22:21, 1 February 2021 review of submission by 2400:ADC5:184:2500:35AE:A3B3:3F23:E609
i put some 1 more info in the wiki page at bottom so u can go and see that my resources are true and btw u can also ask 6b6t owner leee on 6b6t.co discord that my resources are true to join the discord go to 6b6t.co webpage and there is a link down below in that web page and leee owner of 6b6t.co said i can make wiki artical on 6b6t.co so i have full right to publish this artical thanks your for teading this:) 2400:ADC5:184:2500:35AE:A3B3:3F23:E609 (talk) 10:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

10:23:17, 1 February 2021 review of submission by ETHAN JA3DA
ETHAN JA3DA (talk) 10:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi! So I recently wrote my first article and it was called "Not notable enough for Wikipedia." It was about the YouTuber "NileRed", with 2.4 Million subscribers. So I was just curious about why it was rejected?
 * Your draft offers no independent reliable sources with significant coverage that have chosen on their own to write about this person that show how they meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. It doesn't matter if they have two subscribers or two thousand or two billion. If no independent sources write about them, they will not merit a Wikipedia article at this time.  Most "YouTubers" rarely have such coverage.  Please see Your First Article for more information.
 * Subscriber numbers also mean very little as they are easily gamed. Is it one person with 2.5 million accounts? 10 with 250,000 each?  Do all 2.5 million regularly watch the channel?  This is why subscriber numbers aren't part of the notability criteria. 331dot (talk) 10:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , next to what 331dot stated please have a closer look at Wikipedia:Notability. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

12:17:47, 1 February 2021 review of submission by Kkmal.Hamouda
My article doesn't contradict Wikipedia's purposes. It is AFC submission and is assumed finalized. I am patient for the reviewing as asked me to do. Actually, I want to tell this is the last time I use AFC Submission. I learned a lot about it. If it can be accepted and finalized as AFC this time, I won't look back. This is a part of calculus mathematics, but historical for a problem of the natural log that wasn't solved for a long time and now is everywhere. It is for all levels graduate school and undergraduate university levels and all types of people who reads or interested.

This to tell you also, my article is not a how-to-do guide, not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal. It is open and for all levels and community. As I requested previously to accept my article this time as AFC, and I wouldn't go back to use AFC Submission again. So it doesn't contrary to all Wikipedia's rules, contents or purposes.

Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 12:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * It looks like original research, which Wikipedia cannot accept, in any case it has been tagged for deletion. Theroadislong (talk) 12:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

13:12:16, 1 February 2021 review of submission by Justice Faith
It's been over 3 months and Draft:RebeccaNnengiHampson has not been reviewed. I would like to request for an editor to review it, as it is quite urgent. The biography of the person involved needs to be posted on Wikipedia because there are so many blogs with false information. Justice Faith (talk) 13:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can. You need to be patient. It does appear that it was declined today. 331dot (talk) 13:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note that Wikipedia is only interested in summarizing what independent reliable sources state. If you just want to tell about this person and counter what you term false information, there is social media and other websites where that is permitted. If you represent this person, please read about conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 13:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

14:47:08, 1 February 2021 review of submission by ZoeShanks
ZoeShanks (talk) 14:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I have reviewed the Wikipedia:Five Pillars article and I believed I reworded this article with a neutral point of view.

This is my first article and I wanted to do my best to make it an encyclopedic entry, but the fluffy words and grandiose of some articles I have been reading somewhat blurred my common-sense in writing this. After re-reading the Five Pillars I now understand this.

Please give me feedback on my new edits if you can and let me know if my new rewording is correct. Thank you.
 * It may not read like an advert now, but it's unclear how it would pass WP:NCORP. Theroadislong (talk) 14:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

16:04:31, 1 February 2021 review of draft by CasaBasaSF
I am using the visual editor to create my possible submission. I've worked hard on the content and its supporting references, as well as continuing to work on my tone and trimming what to include before I re-submit. My question is on how to format the look of the page. I've looked through the material but it all looks like it wants me to code. If it was simple html/css, no problem, however though I understand what the coding is asking, it is more than my old brain wants to comprehend. Is there a simpler way to wrap a box around some text for a toc, for instance? Or to do a horizontal rule across the page?

Thank you very much. I remember when this started and it was a much simpler process to recommend and submit articles. However many years later, I marvel at how far it has come. CasaBasaSF (talk)CasaBasaSF CasaBasaSF (talk) 16:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

16:15:36, 1 February 2021 review of draft by Ella Lachow
Ella Lachow (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You didn't ask a question. The distannce numbers IMO need a source. Do you have additional concerns? Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

17:58:28, 1 February 2021 review of draft by Aficia
Thank you for your help. I submitted an article and received a rejection response stating that the proposed article had "insufficient content" for an article. It is my first article so I was hesitant to make it overlong, but there was much more information available on the subject. However as a new editor I don't know if the amount of content is the problem or something else. FYI, I quoted and cited multiple published (non-Wikipedia) sources on the topic, published between 2002 and present. Thank you again for any information and advice to improve my contribution. Aficia (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Aficia (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , your draft has not been rejected. It has, instead, been declined with a firm suggestion to merge it to Jucifer. Any Wikipedia editor in good standing may edit any article, so there os nothing to prevent your making these additions. Fiddle   Faddle  10:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

19:40:53, 1 February 2021 review of submission by 2601:41:4003:D420:CC5F:B578:331C:CDB6
2601:41:4003:D420:CC5F:B578:331C:CDB6 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

20:59:11, 1 February 2021 review of submission by 96.89.20.85
why is this getting denied 96.89.20.85 (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * There appears to be only one source here that would contribute towards notability. Google Play does not show notability as it is a directory/registry of sorts and is not WP:SIGCOV. AviationFreak 💬 05:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

21:21:02, 1 February 2021 review of submission by 2603:8000:D201:97E:9185:BBDA:FECB:C615
2603:8000:D201:97E:9185:BBDA:FECB:C615 (talk) 21:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Advanced Medical Solutions International (AMSI) If their device is for real, then SOMEONE START AND ARTICLE ON The Covid Hunter device and the owning company.


 * I'm really not sure what you mean - I looked at your draft (Draft:The Covid Hunter (device)) and it is quite a ways away from the WP:GNG. AviationFreak 💬 05:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Perhaps reading WP:Your first article may also be woth some time. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

21:28:45, 1 February 2021 review of submission by JBWPpw
JBWPpw (talk) 21:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC) I submitted a revised draft on my proposed page Barry Rumack on Nov 18/2020 and it has not yet been reviewed. i s ther anything futher I should be doing?


 * Not at the moment - There is currently a large backlog at AfC, and it may be a little while longer before the draft is reviewed. In the meantime, you are welcome to improve your draft if you feel it is lacking in any areas. AviationFreak 💬 05:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)