Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 February 22

= February 22 =

Request on 00:12:12, 22 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 38.132.215.49
The film Operation Odessa is currently playing on Netflix. I tried to look it up and got redirected to some Manga site - not cool.

I made a start on fixing it. Wouldn't take much more to get a basic page up. Maybe someone could fix it? I've done my bit to try and set it right and am done.

38.132.215.49 (talk) 00:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * While it is always possible, I doubt any other editor will pick your draft up. It's a positive start but requires referencing. If you wish to go back to it please ask for the help you need Fiddle   Faddle  16:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

06:44:15, 22 February 2021 review of submission by Lkcitycliff
Lkcitycliff (talk) 06:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

I want to create an article from wikipedia editors? I will give the title of the business and want to create a page. I need the help of editors to complete the article. Please write an article for me.
 * Hello Lkcitycliff, I think you are looking for WP:Requested articles. It has a large backlog Though... If this refers to a specific draft, please provide a link. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

15:46:35, 22 February 2021 review of submission by Finna fly
because this is for a friend and im ready for review Finna fly (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , first, please do not write articles "for a friend". Please see WP:COI. Second, this draft has been rejected and thus will not be considered further Fiddle   Faddle  16:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Request on 15:59:42, 22 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 76.240.112.154
I added footnotes and don't understand why this is being declined. All proper footnotes were added

76.240.112.154 (talk) 15:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I have conducted a further review and left what I hope are helpful comments on your draft Fiddle   Faddle  16:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

16:21:14, 22 February 2021 review of draft by Bbarmadillo
Please give your opinion on the page. It is a properly stated WP:COI contribution, that I fully reworked after the initial decline. Do you see any issues with the page that need to be fixed? Is the existing redirect a problem? --Bbarmadillo (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Bbarmadillo (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you for submitting it for review. It will now take its place in the pool of drafts for review. A redirect will not present a problem  Fiddle   Faddle  16:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * While awaiting review do, please, continue to enhance the draft. Submission does not freeze the draft Fiddle   Faddle  16:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * thank you. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

17:06:36, 22 February 2021 review of draft by Engblu
Hi, firstly excuse my lack of experience in the procedure for asking for help. I am trying to edit a page that has been reviewed. It states in the review that the "Comment: There are a lot of unsourced statements". I have used links from mainly two sites having seen many other pages on persons who are Music producers or have similar roles. I am confused as to why these link sources are not applicable or not valid. The information the sites has been indeed verified by the sites and cross checked with the releases mentioned. This may seem obvious to editors but to myself if i could ask for an explanation and some help then on securing exactly what is required. Not everyone is mentioned in published books as to me that seems to be what is required. If a much simpler page / entry would be acceptable then please let me know. Also I do not know where a replay to this inquiry might "appear" ? maybe on my "talk" page ? Many thanks Engblu.

Engblu (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , The answer appears here. Are you associated professionally or personally with Mr Lyon? if so you must declare it. Please see WP:COI and/or WP:PAID. Even if closely associated with, or even being Mr Lyon you are entitled to create and edit the draft on the gentleman.
 * To understand more about references you may find that reading WP:42 and WP:THREE help.
 * Your objective is to assert and verify that the gentleman is notable in a Wikipedia sense.
 * This means that he must not just be a decent chap doing his job well, but that there must be an almost indefinable extra element to him.
 * There's a lot to read here, so please ask again after you've read and digested the advice and started to put it into practice Fiddle   Faddle  22:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * For reasons I am not entirely sure I understand, this conversation has been replicated on my talk page by an IP editor, with further comment. I've answered it there, and I invite others who may be able to assist to join in there Fiddle   Faddle  17:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * There's a lot to read here, so please ask again after you've read and digested the advice and started to put it into practice Fiddle   Faddle  22:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * For reasons I am not entirely sure I understand, this conversation has been replicated on my talk page by an IP editor, with further comment. I've answered it there, and I invite others who may be able to assist to join in there Fiddle   Faddle  17:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * For reasons I am not entirely sure I understand, this conversation has been replicated on my talk page by an IP editor, with further comment. I've answered it there, and I invite others who may be able to assist to join in there Fiddle   Faddle  17:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

18:30:49, 22 February 2021 review of submission by Monir1975
Hi, This article was declined due to not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. I have added further references, are those enough to resubmit for futther review?
 * , it was not only declined, it was also rejected and thus will not be considered further. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Monir1975 (talk) 18:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

18:30:49, 22 February 2021 review of draft by Monir1975
}}

18:34:26, 22 February 2021 review of submission by Sohil Mandal
Sohil Mandal (talk) 18:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , what is your question? CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Request on 19:34:15, 22 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Nynewsguy
I'm requesting assistance with understanding the citations I have which were deemed "unreliable." I've cited CBS News, IMDB and AdWeek among others.

I've now noticed that the page in question - Len Tepper - has now been scraped and copied to wikitia too, presumably "verified" by their "editors."

I'm happy to revise as needed. But I need more to go on as to why these sources - that exist as citations on countless other wikipedia pages - are not considered reliable now.

Thank you for any help you can provide. Thom Craver

Nynewsguy (talk) 19:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * IMDB is not considered a reliable source because it is user-editable. The "NBC News" section needs a few sources, compare WP:BLP. Victor Schmidt (talk) 21:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Request on 21:38:42, 22 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Antiquatuss
Dear Wikipeadia Master Minds, please have a look at the "Fiber Patch Placement" draft and corresponding discussions. I understood, regulatories differ, but i tried my best to redesign the article as I understood your rules and I perfectly cannot understand, why this is completely ignored. I really believe, a new additive manufacturing technology should be mentioned. Thank you in advance for your help! Antiquatuss (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Antiquatuss (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I have added a source from the European Space Agency that includes a definition of fiber patch placement and passed the review so it is now in mainspace under Fiber Patch Placement. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

23:39:00, 22 February 2021 review of submission by AshleyDBuck
Removed marketing jargon Removed KGP Films Provided additional adequate resources And note there is no financial or connection with the subject. A big fan of her work and Narcoleap.

AshleyDBuck (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

23:46:29, 22 February 2021 review of submission by AshleyDBuck
Revised the page by removing marketing jargon and a second subject. Please note there is no financial or other connection with the author and subject. Fan of subjects work.

AshleyDBuck (talk) 23:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I have tidied up the article a little bit and accepted the submission, though further work is required and a search for sources has been made difficult by the more famous British shadow cabinet minister with the same name. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  23:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)