Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 February 24

= February 24 =

00:23:50, 24 February 2021 review of submission by Gfisk86
How do I declare my connection with the subject I'm writing about? Gfisk86 (talk) 00:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on how to disclose. 331dot (talk) 00:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

07:11:33, 24 February 2021 review of submission by 2407:C00:D003:BB8D:1:1:8C88:E584
2407:C00:D003:BB8D:1:1:8C88:E584 (talk) 07:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

08:09:26, 24 February 2021 review of draft by Apos gk
Hi, can someone review my submission? Thanks a lot!!

Apos gk (talk) 08:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You have submitted your draft and it is pending review. Reviews are conducted by volunteers on their own time, in no particular order.  As noted in your submission notice, "This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,710 pending submissions waiting for review."  You will need to be patient. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , with full reasons stated on the draft  Fiddle   Faddle  19:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

09:33:45, 24 February 2021 review of submission by Zenith Banker
Hi my Name Is Zenith Banker. and i am well known photographer and cinematographer in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. i just want share my information on Wikipdia. my Work Profie, about project which i have done and all thats all and the given information is 100% authentic. Thank you.Zenith Banker (talk) 09:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC) Zenith Banker (talk) 09:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia does not have "profiles". Wikipedia has articles written by independent editors. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves or their work.  Please use social media or other forums where that is permitted. Please review the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 10:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

12:39:11, 24 February 2021 review of submission by Nigel-harps1954
Question regarding the suitability, or rather notability, of the League of Ireland as a 'fully professional league'? Wondering why this submission has been rejected on these grounds, when in fact, the League of Ireland is a fully professional league.

Why a player who has represented his country internationally, and has played as a full time professional footballer, has this submission been rejected?

Just speaking as someone involved with the club Kosovar Sadiki plays with, he is, in fact, a full time professional footballer, in a professional football team, in a professional football league, that only in the winter past, had a club playing in the Europa League group stages.

What makes this lacking notability, specifcially, in terms of a non-full time professional environment?

Answers would be appreciated. Nigel-harps1954 (talk) 12:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If the league is fully professional, you will need to explain that to the reviewer. 331dot (talk) 13:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Request on 17:20:39, 24 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by BlackholeWA // Inappropriate merge destination
Hi,

I created an article draft last month for the Death of Nóra Quoirin, a pretty major missing persons/unexplained death case in the UK and Malaysia that has seen a lot of diverse coverage over the past few years, especially given the ongoing controversy as to whether her death was the result of foul play. This (and the inclusion of an article on the matter in the Malay wikipedia) seemed grounds to sustain a standalone article here to me, but that's a little besides the point.

The AfC draft I made was declined because the reviewer didn't think there was enough lasting notability, but recommended I merge the content into List of solved missing person cases. I did this, and also populated several redirects about the matter to point to an anchor on that entry. Following this... all the content was promptly deleted by an editor on that list, because it turns out it is in fact a list for cases that already have a corresponding standalone Wikipedia article.

Given the longevity and breadth of coverage of this case, I'm fairly sure at least a paragraph or two of information about it should have a home on the English wikipedia, and it already has coverage on at least one foreign language edition of the site. Personally, I think that a standalone page may be warranted, but, barring that, I would like to merge the content elsewhere. Given that the instructions given by the submission closer recommended merging into an article where the content was inappropriate (and immediately deleted), and that there are now several hanging redirects pointing to a page that doesn't mention their subject, it'd be good to know how to proceed, whether that's a different merge location, or the re-opening of the original draft.

Edit: Tagging in reviewer. BlackholeWA (talk) 17:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC) BlackholeWA (talk) 17:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I will wait for another opinion before commenting. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 06:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I think it's best for me to start replying now after waiting for two days. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 17:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , evaluating similar articles on that list, I think I am willing to revert my position on the notability of the subject per C2 of WP:EVENTCRIT. I think continuing on the draft is the best for now.
 * However, when comparing the current draft and similar articles, the current draft seems to lack in content. Similar articles usually have several content sections.  I think you can expand content by describing the event in more detail.
 * One last thing, I think if the sources are more diverse (most of the sources are from BBC), it might also help. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 17:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * One last thing, I think if the sources are more diverse (most of the sources are from BBC), it might also help. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 17:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * One last thing, I think if the sources are more diverse (most of the sources are from BBC), it might also help. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 17:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Understood, thank you. I didn't intend to write an entirely comprehensive account - my intention was to create a stub just so the matter was covered - by I can do some more additions. I invite anyone else to add to the page also if they wish. BlackholeWA (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

17:23:05, 24 February 2021 review of draft by 24.228.70.170
Hi, I'm semi-new to wikipedia. I'd like to write about North New Jersey Record Labels and so far I've been working on Command Records which already existed and Mint 400 Records which is a draft, and eventually I'd like to move onto smaller ones. But Mint 400 it looks like the article can't be approved even after I showed some very significant people like Fountains of Wayne, Frank Iero, Victoria Williams and others connected to them. I've looked at other labels pages and they too are only mentioned in passing in their references. I'm not quite understanding what kind of press validates them if not mentions in major publications like Alternative Press and North NJ newspapers? This label has over 370 releases and I wanted to actually focus on some smaller labels than this one but I'm not sure how that is possible but I see in other states all of their small record labels have pages and they aren't under intense scrutiny and I'm wondering why?

24.228.70.170 (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You need substantial independent references. WP:42 will guide you well Fiddle   Faddle  18:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

17:39:49, 24 February 2021 review of submission by 2A00:23C5:B600:7D01:EC4C:5ABD:CE36:8145
2A00:23C5:B600:7D01:EC4C:5ABD:CE36:8145 (talk) 17:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * This draft by self declared paid editor has been rejected. It will not be considered further. If you are that user please denote edit while logged out, which is seen as gaming the system  Fiddle   Faddle  18:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Nothing to do with me. I have requested draft deletion. MisterTech (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

18:39:56, 24 February 2021 review of submission by Sanjaysharma2021
Sanjaysharma2021 (talk) 18:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , your draft has been rejected which means it will not be considered further Fiddle   Faddle  19:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

23:29:22, 24 February 2021 review of submission by DJPoobs
Hi, I have added a lot more information now so its line with other actress and actors at the same level, however I can not find the button to send it for review after the last comment that was added, is that due to the comment

DJPoobs (talk) 23:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You have added a lot more content, but zero reliable sources, the draft was rejected meaning it won't be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 08:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)