Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 January 10

= January 10 =

Request on 01:11:11, 10 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 0mtwb9gd5wx
Why is Draft:CalFile ad-like? It has quotes and citations from reliable, independent, third-party sources. 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 01:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

03:07:16, 10 January 2021 review of submission by 2601:6C2:4000:6B60:3146:8A30:64CD:9947
Company went public 2601:6C2:4000:6B60:3146:8A30:64CD:9947 (talk) 03:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. That a company is public is irrelevant as to whether or not it merits a Wikipedia article; please review the Wikipedia definition of a notable company. 331dot (talk) 11:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Going public in and of itself does nothing to change whether a company is notable or not. However, sometimes when a company goes notable, it generates "truly independent" press coverage from "reliable sources. If this "truly independent" coverage in "reliable sources" rises to the level of "significant coverage" then that coverage - not the fact that the company went public - means the company that was formerly not "notable" now is.  The "gotcha" is that the coverage has to be "truly independent" of the company and those trying to raise its profile.  Anything that is created by or on behalf of the company or those who seek to "promote" it in the public eye has zero bearing on the company's "notability" as defined by Wikipedia.  The same goes for "warmed over press releases," interviews, and stories that are almost entirely based on those things even if it is published in a "reliable source."  In this case, as with so many others when a person or company is "seeking publicity," the issue is not just whether the source is "reliable" but also whether the material being cited as a source really is "independent of the subject."  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  16:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

06:12:26, 10 January 2021 review of draft by Tobias.Vogel
{{SAFESUBST:Void|

I would like to get Draft:Digital_Engineering published. It was declined two times already (in different states) and I think that I resolved the reason (missing reliable sources). I don't know how to proceed now.

PS: I think this safesubst-void template is broken. The artifact on top of my text should not be there, should it? I clicked that link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_submission/draft/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Digital_Engineering Tobias.Vogel (talk) 06:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

11:23:33, 10 January 2021 review of submission by 86.60.58.57
86.60.58.57 (talk) 11:23, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 11:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Request on 12:09:50, 10 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Aparnasagar
Why have to rejected my submission for "Arjun Mark"? He is a real person.

Aparnasagar (talk) 12:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * No one has said he is not a real person; not all people merit Wikipedia articles. It appears that this person does not meet the Wikipedia definition of a notable creative professional. 331dot (talk) 12:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

12:12:35, 10 January 2021 review of draft by LiorAdato
Hello, My name is Lior, i am trying to write an article about a person and it is my first time doing so. i am having a little trouble understanding how and about what do i need to include references. Thank you and have a nice day ! LiorAdato (talk) 12:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

12:52:21, 10 January 2021 review of submission by Wooplk
Hello, I'm re requesting a revision in this page because sayuru akash is a pioneer brand (personality) in western province, Sri Lanka that is currently being trending around the community in SriLanka and even on media in here. Even you can find his knowledge panel in google (Sayuru Akash) and also links to his music creations in this article space. As a fan it is a great loss to not have his space on wikipedia as a recognized brand cause he is recognized in around the country. Please recheck and approve this article on wikipedia. Thanks a lot for understanding and Have a Great Day friend! Wooplk (talk) 12:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Yust from a first glance, I see no source that is reliable and independent. You linked to a google search, please note that google searches are considered inappropiate because they may change at any time, and because nobody is going to look at 10+ pages of search results to find something. Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

13:58:00, 10 January 2021 review of submission by Wooplk
,https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sayuru_Akash#/editor/0

Hello, I'm re requesting a revision in this page because sayuru akash is a pioneer brand (personality) in western province, Sri Lanka that is currently being trending around the community in SriLanka and even on media in here. Even you can find his music in spotify, apple music, (https://music.apple.com/lk/artist/sayuru-akash/1535830951) amazon (https://music.amazon.com/artists/B08L8HWK3B/sayuru-akash) and in many more platforms. and also about his path as an actor in the series " Hmm with Sayuru and Chanuka " in imdb ( https://m.imdb.com/name/nm12006250/) in this article space. As a fan it is a great loss to not have his space on wikipedia as a recognized brand cause he is recognized in around the country. Please recheck and approve this article on wikipedia. Thanks a lot for understanding and Have a Great Day friend!

Wooplk (talk) 13:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Your draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. If you are trying to appeal this, you must be prepared with reasons for why Sayuru Akash either meets the general notability guideline or the specific notability guideline for musicians. For example, if he is trending in Sri Lanka, then there must be many reliable publications that talk about him in great depth. These are what you need to have had in your draft. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 14:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

14:37:17, 10 January 2021 review of submission by LiorAdato
I am not asking for a Re-review i am asking for advice. The person i am writing about is not related to me, i just did my research on him with his cooperation. What can i do to make the article worthy of acceptance ? Thank you. LiorAdato (talk) 14:37, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, there is nothing that you can do, as the draft was rejected, which means it will not be considered further at this time. Wikipedia is not just a place to tell about someone and what they do; a Wikipedia article about a person must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person.
 * If you have been working with Mr. Dray on the article, you have a conflict of interest that you should formally disclose. 331dot (talk) 14:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

15:19:47, 10 January 2021 review of submission by Aslı Kırar
Aslı Kırar (talk) 15:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

15:19:47, 10 January 2021 review of submission by Aslı Kırar

17:18:30, 10 January 2021 review of submission by ShafiShabab32
ShafiShabab32 (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia isn't social media, it's not a place for telling the world about yourself, your draft has zero reliable independent sources, and was rejected because you are clearly not notable in Wikipedia terms, like most of us. Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

19:12:17, 10 January 2021 review of draft by Posso Sports
need help to publish that page of romanian athlete with national records. I add almost everything on the draft, like database of source (world athletics.org) with dirt link of athlete page in in question.

Posso Sports (talk) 19:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft has been submitted and is pending. It may take many weeks if not months, please be patient. 331dot (talk) 23:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

20:32:00, 10 January 2021 review of draft by OneTwoThreeHoneyBee
The current "Color mapping" wikipedia page refers to color mapping in photography - a very specialised function to map colors from one image to another. This page - currently "Color map" - is referring to the much more general sense of the term, which is mapping data to colours. This is not only many times more common, but also much more relevant to the general public as most data is displayed with color mapping (e.g., weather maps, hazard maps, etc.). Due to the very different meanings, I cannot simply merge the content of the two pages. I now suggest changing the titles to (1) "Color mapping (photography)" and (2) "Color mapping (data)". Would that make sense or do you have another suggestion?

OneTwoThreeHoneyBee (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

22:45:23, 10 January 2021 review of submission by 190.28.131.225
190.28.131.225 (talk) 22:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC) plis garit dwoniverse create and goloofworld created
 * Huh? davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  23:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)