Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 January 17

= January 17 =

08:13:10, 17 January 2021 review of draft by Damola33
My submission made 2 months ago hasn't been attended too by anyone.

Damola33 (talk) 08:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

14:01:04, 17 January 2021 review of submission by Midnight713
Thank you Padavalamkuttanpilla for the feedback. I am surprised that the references were deemed as not significant coverage. I can include more references if necessary. I imagined that the National Ballet company of a sovereign country would be worthy of a Wiki entry but am open to correction and can delete if references are not sufficient. Midnight713 (talk) 14:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Midnight713 (talk) 14:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This has been answered at the Teahouse. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

18:16:37, 17 January 2021 review of draft by Innovatao
I'm attempting to get this past initial draft, it was requested I put the page together, and as far as I can tell it has all of the reference and reference types requested by Wikipedia. However the notes I receive back only say they need more, but everything I can get hold of is on there. They are not an actress, they are an entrepreneur working for LQBTQ+ causes. I have had the page moved, mistaken for the fictional character, but nothing actually definitive. Could you please assist as I must be missing something. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Naomi_Bennett_(entrepreneur)

Innovatao (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

19:17:16, 17 January 2021 review of submission by Melvinblair
Melvinblair (talk) 19:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

20:52:15, 17 January 2021 review of submission by Sarika9140
Hello why have u rejected. State clearly.

I have used thejapantimes as citation, no useless information, no copyright violation, then why rejected? Tell plz Sarika9140 (talk) 20:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi . The topic does not warrant a stand alone article. It is already covered more than adequately within Momo Challenge hoax. Spinoff articles should be discussed on the article's talk page as described in Splitting. They are widely considered outside the scope of Articles for creation, and volunteer reviewers here may not take kindly to editors who waste their time by submitting spinoffs. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

22:15:07, 17 January 2021 review of draft by Softwaretestnews
I have received the reason for declining the article on Providence Office Products to be because the sources are not independent and reliable. All of the sources are independent and from reputable companies or media firms. Because I am new to Wikipedia editing, I would like any assistance possible on the steps necessary to improve the draft for publishing.

Thank you

softwaretestwriter (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)