Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 January 2

= January 2 =

01:13:27, 2 January 2021 review of submission by Stephen Truscott
Hello, Concerning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Stephen_Austin_Truscott I am fairly inexperienced in drafting pages and it seems I have not followed correct procedure regarding this draft entry. Would you please advise me what I need to do to correct this entry for it to be published or if that is not possible, how might I delete this draft entry?

Many thanks

Stephen

Stephen Truscott (talk) 01:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Please review the autobiography policy; while not forbidden, it is strongly discouraged to write about yourself. To succeed at doing so, you need to set aside everything you know about yourself and only write based on what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about you, showing how you meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. 331dot (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

02:11:47, 2 January 2021 review of submission by Lalisekhon
I have reviewed the Wikipedia policies on neutrality. I have editted accordingly and respectfully ask for re-review. Lalisekhon (talk) 02:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I've requested a block on the user at AIV. Sole purpose, evidenced by dozens of draft edits, is self promotion. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

04:33:52, 2 January 2021 review of submission by Bikiransimkhada
I've been trying to publish this article about the company but I can't get it right. Any help would be appreciated.

Draft:Mero Prasna

Bikiransimkhada (talk) 04:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not for merely telling the world about the existence of a company. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. If you do not have at least three independent sources with significant coverage(not press releases, staff interviews, announcements of routine business transactions, etc.) this company would not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. Not every company does, even within the same field. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

04:40:52, 2 January 2021 review of submission by Bikiransimkhada
04:40:52, 2 January 2021 review of submission by Bikiransimkhada

Bikiransimkhada (talk) 04:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

08:44:09, 2 January 2021 review of submission by Ishaan 2460
Ishaan 2460 (talk) 08:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC) Why my articles are declined! I havent broken any rules and regulation of wikipedia. The information that i have entered all are correct about my self please publish it on google as a biography
 * Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. Autobiographical articles are strongly discouraged per the autobiography policy.  Wikipedia is not concerned with helping enhance search results for you.  If you want to tell the world about yourself, you should use social media or a personal website. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

08:54:46, 2 January 2021 review of draft by Silvia Dalle Montagne
I'm asking help to adjust my draft submission "Luca Formentini", on which I got the following comment: "This still reads more like a resume" I just wanted to make sure where the specific problem is. Is it in the list of the works I've compiled or in the form I'm using? I'm asking for your help so to be able of focusing on the real issue instead of working on parts that don't need any change. Many many thanks and excuse me for my weak knowledge on submitting articles.

Silvia Dalle Montagne (talk) 08:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The main issues are that the content isn't supported with inline citations, and the writing style doesn't match the rest of the encyclopedia. Take a look at Midori (violinist) as an example of how to structure the content, and how to properly source a musician's biographical info with inline citations. The citations there now are all music reviews, and don't include biographical info. If all I could write about Luca is what is in the shown sources, the article would be much, much shorter. Maybe try to parse it and only include sourced info - then you can add more info if the article is approved and/or you find better sourcing. TechnoTalk (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

09:44:23, 2 January 2021 review of submission by Wasimkhanofficial
I have added the authentic references in the article. Kindly review now.

Wasimkhanofficial (talk) 09:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Your draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further and it will only waste your time and that of others to pursue this further at this time. Wikipedia is not social media for you to tell the world about yourself. Please also see the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 09:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

11:19:39, 2 January 2021 review of submission by Textor Alector
Draft has generated some debate, consensus seems to tilt toward recognizing notability + legitimacy but how do I get in touch with Wiki projects and editors interested in the issues involved? (STEM Women, African content etc)

Textor Alector (talk) 11:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Draft talk:Medical Women's Association of Nigeria lists relevant WikiProjects. Each mustard-yellow box contains links to a project and to its talk page. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I made some general improvements. If you properly source all the information that's there, and fill out the refs as I did with the source I just added, you'll have a better shot at getting this approved. You'll also want to check to make sure the existing refs are good, and that they actually say what the sentences preceding them imply they say. Good luck! TechnoTalk (talk) 21:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

11:29:37, 2 January 2021 review of submission by Mathematicalinstitutes
Mathematicalinstitutes (talk) 11:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

14:37:11, 2 January 2021 review of draft by Immersivearteditor
Hi, I've written a page about an artist and art director. It was declined at first, because of this message:

"This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia".

I understand it and now I've a question, about those references. What kind they have to be? Because the subject of my wiki page doesn't have so much coverage in the internet articles, he is mentioned several times when one of his work is published, but most of the interview he gave, in all of these years, are for magazine and papers, not online. Do you of Wikipedia need proof of that? Can I submit the papers in some way? And this is because in the message above it's specified "not just passing mentions" but if you research his name you'll find only those. And it's also a reason to have a wikipedia page, to have more coverage! I can submit proofs, if it's needed Thank you!

Immersivearteditor (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * To merit a Wikipedia article, a artist must be shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources to meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable creative professional. To take that apart a bit, "Significant coverage" is that which goes beyond things like routine announcements or brief mentions. "Independent" means that the sources must not have originated from the subject, so no press releases, interviews, a personal website, or social media accounts.  "Reliable" means that the source must have a reputation of fact checking and editorial control.
 * Sources do not need to be online, and do not need to be easy or free to access, but they must be publicly available(such as being in a library). Documents in private hands inaccessible to the public are not acceptable. 331dot (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

14:47:33, 2 January 2021 review of submission by SingerSairaPeter
I don't know why my article are not publishing, let me know if I am missing any information because all content provided by Saira Peter who is the singer. SingerSairaPeter (talk) 14:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * First, if you are not Saira Peter, you will need to change your username; please visit Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS to do that. If you represent her, you will need to read about conflict of interest and paid editing to learn how to make the required paid editing declaration(a Terms of Use requirement).
 * You say the information was provided by her; Wikipedia is not interested in what someone wants to say about themselves. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a singer, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable singer. 331dot (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

15:25:59, 2 January 2021 review of draft by Malcolm L. Mitchell
I recently submitted a draft article, Draft:The Catch II. After review, it was deemed "insufficient content to require an article of its own", I want to ask, could anyone suggest what to add to make it a better standalone article? I truly believe it has merit to be its own article instead of just part of the 1998-99 NFL playoffs page.

Malcolm L. Mitchell (talk) 15:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

15:27:57, 2 January 2021 review of submission by Page Representative
Page Representative (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

I have seen many such articles on wikipedia. Why this article is being rejected. Kindly provide space for it on Wikipedia Page Representative (talk) 15:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Please edit this existing section for any follow up comments, instead of creating new sections.
 * Please note that as this is a volunteer project, where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to go undetected, even for years. We can only address what we know about.  If you'd care to point out some of these other articles, we can address them if they are indeed inappropriate.  Other inappropriate articles existing does not mean that yours can too.  Please see other stuff exists.
 * As noted by reviewers, this topic does not seem to meet the special Wikipedia definition of notability. 331dot (talk) 15:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Sir why my Draft:Kakkay Abbasi is not published while I have seen many such articles on Wikipedia Page Representative (talk) 06:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Please read the above. As I said, please edit this existing section to ask further questions, do not create additional sections.  This is easier to do with the full version of Wikipedia in a browser on a computer or phone, you can click "edit" in the section header. 331dot (talk) 08:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Request on 15:33:33, 2 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Daniela De Rentiis
I'm Daniela De Rentiis and I'm trying to put on english wikipedia the exaxt traslation of a wikipage in italian language: the biography of Santino Spinelli. This fact was pointed out 10 hours ago: ''This article was translated from the Italian Wikipedia article it:Santino Spinelli by Daniela De Rentiis. Subsequently, [1] is using the English translation without attribution, in violation of the terms of Wikipedia's license. If someone could bring that to the website manager's attention (it sounds like the translator is in contact with them?), that would be great. As Victor Schmidt pointed out here, material in Wikipedia is licensed in a way that it can be re-used with some conditions. See Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content for a guide on the topic. Thanks all for bringing this to WP:Copyright problems. Sorry for the slow response. Ajpolino (talk) 05:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)'' My question is: how could I pubblisha simple translation of a biography from Italian to english? I'm hete to officially ask for help.

Daniela De Rentiis (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It's important to understand when translating articles on other language versions of Wikipedia that each language version is its own project, with its own editors, policies, and standards. What is acceptable on one language version(say, the Italian one) is not necessarily acceptable here. As the English Wikipedia is one of the oldest, if not the oldest, it has more developed standards for inclusion than other versions.  As noted by reviewers on the draft, you need to show with significant coverage in independent reliable sources that this musician meets the English Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. 331dot (talk) 15:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

22:59:52, 2 January 2021 review of draft by Csoconn
Csoconn (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello! I am a college professor and this semester my students did a project researching influential academics and writing wiki pages about them (we did not use the Wiki Edu infrastructure, which was purely because I'm new to wikipedia and didn't realize we could - apologies). My student wrote a page on Dr. Jeanette Davis under Draft: Jeanette Davis (2), which was recently declined because Draft:Jeanette Davis exists. However, Draft:Jeanette Davis was declined in Summer 2020 for not having enough sources. Draft:Jeanette Davis (2) has many more citations than Draft:Jeanette Davis and I think is much more likely to be considered a biography of a notable scientist. Can you let me know what the best next steps are? Should we transfer the text from Draft:Jeanette Davis (2) over to Draft:Jeanette Davis? At that point could it be reconsidered? I also reached out to the editors who declined Draft:Jeanette Davis and Draft:Jeanette Davis (2) to ask for their preferred next steps. Thanks for any point in the right direction - I am new to wikipedia but excited to see Jeanette Davis represented in a biography. Thanks for your help! Csoconn (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , I have copied the text as well as requested the history-merge on the AfC.  Mario Jump  83!  00:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help! Much appreciated and happy new year! Csoconn (talk) 00:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)