Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 January 21

= January 21 =

07:36:17, 21 January 2021 review of submission by Rena Mae Lee Tian
i added some references, this group is still new but they we're having big impact to the community right now here in iloilo city, philippines. i really wanna put them to wikipedia for more people to know their advocacy and be good towards animals. Rena Mae Lee Tian (talk) 07:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You have 5 references to Facebook and one to a blog post, these are not independent reliable sources, you also have links to Instagram and Twitter, again these are not suitable, the draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 10:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

10:46:31, 21 January 2021 review of submission by Wettujggvbb
Please help me to get the article published Wettujggvbb (talk) 10:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about someone; a Wikipedia article must summarize what published independent reliable sources like the news have chosen on their own to say about someone, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Please see Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

13:17:12, 21 January 2021 review of submission by אור פ
Please help me to get the article published. as per User:Scope creep think is pretty decent article now and think he is probably notable, but he think it is probably better if somebody else review's it אור פ (talk) 13:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I think the physician is notable for his procedure, which seems to pop up, all over the shop.   scope_creep Talk  13:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

17:39:17, 21 January 2021 review of submission by Barouy13
Hello, I am reaching out again as I have updated the JumpCloud Wiki page with more key information from independent sources including product history and funding history. I would appreciate if somebody would re-review the page and let me know if it is accepted this time. Thank you. Barouy13 (talk) 17:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * There's too much marketing text - it makes you look connected. Please read WP:COI just in case, and make proper disclosures if you have to. There should be no spaces between the punctuation and the references.  Section titles should be sentence case, not title case. Don't include funding or detailed product info in the lead section. Put a history section first with items in chronological order.  Simple milestones go in the history, but leave the more detailed technical product descriptions for a products section. Make sure everything is properly sourced.  Get rid of anything that says PR or Newswire. Remove the entire recognition section. That promotional info isn't that notable in the eyes of Wikipedia, and makes you look connected, hurting your chances of getting this approved. Good luck! TechnoTalk (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

20:27:01, 21 January 2021 review of submission by Guitarfan21
Hello, I have submitted a new article (Positive Grid) for review. The yellow "article submitted/ please be patient" box appeared very briefly at the top of the page but then disappeared, so I'm not sure if there was an error or if my article is really in the review queue. Any way to tell? Many thanks! Guitarfan21 (talk) 20:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * aparently you didn't follow the instructions to the end. I am going to submit it for you now. Please make sure to follow the instructions to the end next time. Victor Schmidt (talk) 20:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

21:17:39, 21 January 2021 review of submission by CaliKatie
Hi - This is my first article creation and I believe the references are solid and meet the Wiki guidelines. Roy is a very accomplished artist and has several news and magazine articles that have been written about him. I selected the stronger ones as citations that also confirmed statements made in his bio (ie. award winner). The page was declined due to references not meeting requirements and I don't understand why? Perhaps I missed something and one or two references don't meet the requirements but I have seven references listed, including the Los Angeles Times. Can someone please help me to understand the error so we can get Roy listed on the Wiki as he should be. Thank you! CaliKatie (talk) 21:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I made some modest improvements to the article, but couldn't find anything more significant in the sourcing department. What's there now isn't quite enough to demonstrate notability. For example, the first LA Times piece is good, but the other article is listed as an opinion piece in a local satellite publication, but it's not the main LA Times. I think the challenge is that there's not a lot of media covering surfer art. I thought for sure there's be more about the Etta James album cover, and put in the only source I could find, but even that is a bit promotional. You can keep hunting to see if you find anything more to add. TechnoTalk (talk) 01:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)