Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 January 25

= January 25 =

01:23:52, 25 January 2021 review of draft by John T Ghillie
Subject is the foremost authority as author and instructor on tactical Firefighting and the books published assist Firefighters globally. His co-worker/author Shan Raffel has Wikipedia page, so can't understand as Author of three textbooks in field and previous expertise, lecturing at international conferences etc that subject is not notable? Can you advise? Would shorter article focusing on as textbook author satisfy criteria more easily?

John T Ghillie (talk) 01:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Your citations are not properly done. See Help:Referencing for beginners for how to cite sources in Wikipedia, and WP:Biographies of living persons for why we are insistent on sourcing this article properly. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Takes a strong man to deny... 01:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

02:54:53, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Kemmiiii
Kemmiiii (talk) 02:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC) I am requesting another review because the subject meets the notability criiteria both generally and for an actor. Also the fact that her fellow housemates on [|big brother naija]; [|Laycon] and [|Prince] also have Wiki pages despite being more popular and more accomplished than they are. --Kemmiiii (talk) 02:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You make this assertion rather confidently, but if I were to start going through the article and deleting content supported by weak references, such as blogs and user-generated sites like IMDB, I think most sources and content would be deleted. Her birthplace is attributed to IMDb, so that fails WP:UGC and is a violation of WP:BLPPRIVACY. Her schooling is attributed to the school she attended, which fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. The random YouTube links I've clicked on in the article are not from verified channels, so they could be copyright violations. So I'm struggling to see where any of the remainders are from major mainstream sources, or how any of them are all reliable, independent and talk about the subject in significant detail. Anyway, I'm not asking you any questions, I'm just trying to explain the likely reasons why it was rejected. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. These points are noted and will be rectified. Kemmiiii (talk) 07:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Request on 03:31:28, 25 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Harish139
Hi, hope you are doing good. I have been working on an article titled 'Chandramouli Gaddamanugu', who is the project director for Akash Missle. But, the article is getting rejected the reviewers multiple times stating that the references are not sufficient. My point here is that he is a project director for Akash missile for which Wikipedia page is already there. In that case, I think he is also eligible to get a Wikipedia page. WHen it comes to the references, I have already provided sufficient references to support my copy. Please hep me out with this issue. Thanks.

Harish139 (talk) 03:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello! The reason that your submission has been repeatedly declined is that its references do not show significant coverage of the subject. Notability is generally not inherited, meaning that a subject is not notable purely because of their affiliation with something notable (in this case, the Akash missile). If you have questions, please WP:PING me here or reply on my talk page. AviationFreak 💬 05:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

03:39:25, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Sheichey
Sheichey (talk) 03:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Please reconsider the edited content. I deleted the advertisement part of the content. Please let me know if I have more items to delete or revise.


 * This article would need to be essentially rewritten to properly contain a neutral point of view. Even if it were rewritten, the sources currently in the article do not show notability. Most are advertisements, and the last one is a self-published source. AviationFreak 💬 04:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

06:57:52, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Sheichey
Sheichey (talk) 06:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

I edited the content with notable Parent Company reference and an article from Property Report PH that we are a housing brand.
 * Wikipedia is not a place to just tell the world about something. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company.  Press releases, announcement of routine business, brief mentions, staff interviews, and other primary sources do not establish notability.  Please see Your First Article.
 * You will need to read the conflict of interest and paid editing policies and make the required declarations. 331dot (talk) 09:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

09:11:19, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Imonboss
Imonboss (talk) 09:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. Please see the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

11:45:09, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Risa Kuribayashi
Please let me know the reason why my article has been rejected and what should I do for improvement. Thank you.

Risa Kuribayashi (talk) 11:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi . The reasons the draft has been declined are contained within the large pink boxes at the top of the draft, and the policies and guidelines to which they link. Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant coverage of their topic. The draft cites no sources. Help:Referencing for beginners may assist you if the problem is simply that you don't understand how to cite sources, but nothing written in the draft suggests Yanagi has accomplished anything that would make him suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

12:15:47, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Ritikr019
Please let me know the reason why my article has been rejected and what should I do for improvement? Thank you.

Ritikr019 (talk) 12:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi . The reasons the draft has been declined are contained within the large pink boxes at the top of the draft, and the policies and guidelines to which they link. YouTube and Facebook are generally unreliable sources. Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant coverage of their topic. The draft cites none. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, it seems you have written an autobiography. Please note that Wikipedia discourages autobiographies primarily as Wikipedia articles must be neutral in tone. Additionally, do note that Wikipedia is none of the following: a platform for promotion or advertising, a social network like LinkedIn, a web host. I hope you can understand why the draft was declined.  Java Hurricane  15:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

13:15:36, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Conifigueroa
My article was declined by Sulfurboy saying "The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you."

But i don't fully understand what should i fix, i have 11 footnotes with references. What is wrong specifically? I'm new on wikipedia, actually this is my first article

i hope you can help me!

Thank You!!

Conifigueroa (talk) 13:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The minimum standard for inline citations is laid out at WP:MINREF. Basically, most claims need a citation so that readers can easily identify the source of a piece of info. Information on this draft requiring inline citations would include the first paragraph and last sentence of "Early life," citations for each point in "Education," his lead roles, etc. However, as other reviewers have noted, you have provided no indication that this subject meets WP:NMUSICIAN. To respond, please WP:PING me here or reply on my talk page. AviationFreak 💬 15:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

16:02:27, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Vagabond-PRVienna
Not sure if the draft will finally be reviewed. I made the draft: Lüftner Cruises several days ago but I am not sure if it was "correct". I found out, that i have to add some sort of code, but I am still not sure if it is listed now or again not. I also don't know where I can look it up or where I can find the status or even in which position the draft is. Is there any possibility to check all the information regulary and to find out when or even if the article can be published? Vagabond-PRVienna (talk) 16:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Before you worry about that, please read about conflict of interest and paid editing, and make the required declaration.
 * You may resubmit it by clicking the "resubmit" button in the notice at the top of the draft, but it will be rejected again unless you address the concerns. 331dot (talk) 16:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

16:33:01, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Powell Roy
Powell Roy (talk) 16:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

I have written genuinely on my progress as an amateur travel blogger in Malaysia with appropriate resources. My work has been noted by many local travel bloggerd/ companies. Please consider to post information on my travel blog.
 * Wikipedia is not for you to tell the world about your blog. Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources say about you blog on their own, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notable web content. If it is notable, ideally you shouldn't be the one to write about it due to your conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 16:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay understood. Could have replied in a polite manner. Will take into account of the feedback given. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Powell Roy (talk • contribs) 16:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

18:27:32, 25 January 2021 review of draft by Emremer
Emremer (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you have a question? An editor independent of me already determined that the draft is the original source, and I added to the draft talkpage so others can see it. Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

19:31:23, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Harshit603
Harshit603 (talk) 19:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Harshit Agrawal (Born 29 October 2002) is a student and Indian politician. A member of NSUI.

Biography Born in Bhayandar, Maharashtra. He spent his early childhood between Mumbai, Maharashtra and Guna, Madhya Pradesh and stayed away from the public sphere for much of his childhood and early youth. He attained primary education in Jaipur, Rajasthan and Silvassa, Dadra Nagar Haveli. He began his undergraduate career at University of Mumbai.

References www.instagram.com/_real.photographer_

www.twitter.com/nsuiHarshit
 * and therein lies the problem zero reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

22:56:31, 25 January 2021 review of submission by Barouy13
Hello, I recently received advice on here as to how to make the draft of JumpCloud better & more likely to be published. I implemented all of the edits recommended which includes the following: Removed marketing text, removed spaces between the punctuation and the references, changed section titles to sentence case, removed funding info in the lead section, put a history section first with items in chronological order, made sure everything is properly sourced, got rid of anything that says PR or Newswire and removed the entire recognition section. I'd love to get this draft approved, let me know if there is anything I can do to increase my chances. Thank you!

Barouy13 (talk) 22:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)