Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 14

= July 14 =

02:04:01, 14 July 2021 review of submission by 156.204.60.187
156.204.60.187 (talk) 02:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No sources, no article, no debate. The English proficiency shown is also a serious issue. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 11:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

02:35:35, 14 July 2021 review of submission by ItsCojo
I didn't think that the content on the page counted as advertising. My purpose for making the page was to inform players about the server, It was never to advertise. And im sincerely sorry about that, I have deleted what I think is the advertising but if you think there's more tell me and I will get rid off it. ItsCojo (talk) 02:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

04:47:08, 14 July 2021 review of draft by Kennethmank13
SO I recieved the anwser of why my article was declined on July 14, I added the following information to the main Tex Brown Article, Can The Season Split Be Done Now? Kennethmank13 (talk) 04:47, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

10:28:53, 14 July 2021 review of submission by Tirivashe Chikumbirike
It seems as if i am connected to the topic but i am not. I am a big music fan so i am trying to create wikipedia articles for musicians from my country Zimbabwe. This has been my first attempt and i am requesting assistance so that i can polish it and be able to contribute more articles from Zimbabwe Tirivashe Chikumbirike (talk) 10:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

11:07:41, 14 July 2021 review of submission by Sayyar-Mon
Talieh-Sayyar (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Monenco Iran is an consulting engineer whit a remarkable history. there is an strong references, what is problem? how can I publish this page?
 * This reads like a marketing brochure. We don't accept content specifically written to advertise or promote the subject. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 11:47, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Request on 13:25:08, 14 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Bankrupt305
I was told that Zack Weiner doesn't have enough notoriety. He is the founder of one of the most important sports media companies in the world. He created a new basketball league that is in daily headlines all over the world. He's one of the most important young media sports executives in the world. If isn't notable enough, despite the multiple articles in major publications, I'm confused. Please advise. Thank you.

Bankrupt305 (talk) 13:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * As I said above, most of your sources hardly even discuss Weiner, which in turn makes them not particularly useful as sources about him. The only sources that you have that are usable are the DP and New Yorker sources; the rest are deficient in some way, as I explained in my deep dive on your sources. If anything, the sources you cited help prove Overtime is notable more than Weiner.  —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 16:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

13:35:35, 14 July 2021 review of draft by Kartik0976
Kartik0976 (talk) 13:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

13:41:58, 14 July 2021 review of draft by Kartik0976
Sources on this draft are following all the guidelines, Sources are reliable, secondary, independent and significant coverage also in there. But I am not getting why this draft is declined during review, anyone help please

Kartik0976 (talk) 13:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Your sources are lacking required bibliographical information (pages and author). —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 15:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

15:10:13, 14 July 2021 review of submission by UJSchoepf
I am not sure what I need to do after submitting the required changes (intext citations). Please let me know what I can do to have the page published.

UJSchoepf (talk) 15:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * After you have made the changes (making sure EVERY SINGLE CLAIM is sourced) put at the top of the page to resubmit it.  —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 15:31, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * After you have made the changes (making sure EVERY SINGLE CLAIM is sourced) put at the top of the page to resubmit it.  —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 15:31, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

15:43:33, 14 July 2021 review of submission by 76.240.112.154
Please help. Plenty articles online to verify this actor should be on wikipedia

76.240.112.154 (talk) 15:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further, and the sourcing has not changed or improved from the last thread you made. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 15:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

16:42:10, 14 July 2021 review of submission by TELCOR7101
I would like a re-review after making edits to the page after the first submission was denied. After reviewing the purpose fo Wikipedia and viewing other businesses articles I made adjustments to ensure the article met Wikipedia guidelines and did not violate any rules. This page is designed to show off TELCOR as a whole and provide insight to products and solutions. There is no selling involved or links to their website so this article is purely informative about TELCOR products and what their goals are for their clients.

I hope to see this get passed through after making changes and I will continue to revise until this article gets posted so any tips on how to fix the article would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks! TELCOR7101 (talk) 16:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * First, change your username to one that represents you and you alone. Second, disclose. Third, this draft is spam and will be treated as such. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 16:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

18:58:23, 14 July 2021 review of submission by AIsha504
Can you provide information on what would make this page acceptable for posting? AIsha504 (talk) 18:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * By the look of it, your sourcing is atrocious. Refer to the top table here.
 * https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Me_in_Motivate_Letters_of_the_Soul_V.html?id=xDU1CONU1XQC is useless for notability (too sparse). A book listing isn't going to have any information we could realistically use in a biography.
 * http://dos.sunbiz.org/scripts/ficidet.exe?action=DETOWN&docnum=G17000073622&seq=000000001&format=P&name=CARTER%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20AISHA%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20ALICE&rdocnum=G17000073622&rseq=000000001&rformat=P&rname=CARTER%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20AISHA%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20ALICE is useless for notability (Connexion to subject). Government registry.
 * https://books.google.com/books?id=4jqLAwAAQBAJ&pg=PP1&lpg=PP1&dq=The+Me+of+God%27s+Impulse!+Aisha+Carter&source=bl&ots=8jZjZuUrOy&sig=ACfU3U1XKOIK5ieWFcpVlfI5VUZZGJSOWw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjimb3utuPxAhUMDzQIHTShCvsQ6AEwAXoECB8QAw#v=onepage&q=The%20Me%20of%20God's%20Impulse!%20Aisha%20Carter&f=false is useless for notability (Connexion to subject). A deep-dive into the book she wrote is at best going to just verify that she said in her book.
 * We can't use LinkedIn (Deprecated, connexion to subject). LinkedIn is never an acceptable source.
 * We can't use https://spark.adobe.com/page/HKKwjbJ4nE1q2/ (too sparse). Photo gallery.
 * We can't use https://spark.adobe.com/page/AJBaajFdJoaIy/ (Either connexion to subject or non-sequitur). The attribution is to an "Aisha Simpson", and nothing I've seen indicates in any way Doreli changed her legal name, meaning that this is either a completely different person or the change isn't reflected in the article and this is stuff she wrote, making it useless for notability either way.
 * https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/tallahassee/name/dorothy-simpson-obituary?pid=151678043 appears to be completely and totally irrelevant is useless for notability (Too sparse). Name-drop.
 * Does this help? —<i style="color: #1E90FF;">A little blue Bori</i>  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 23:34, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

19:29:36, 14 July 2021 review of submission by Malikjc3
Hello,

I recently submitted a Wikipedia page "Blasian Beats" to be published and it was almost instantly declined so I was just curious as to why? There are smaller or lesser-known musicians that have Wikipedia pages available so I am curious as to why my submission got declined so quickly. Malikjc3 (talk) 19:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Please read other stuff exists. Each article or draft is judged on its own merits; other similar articles existing does not automatically mean that yours can too.  As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, and with over six million articles to watch, it is possible to get inappropriate articles by us.  We can only address what we know about.  If you would like to pitch in and help, you are welcome to work to identify other inappropriate articles you have seen for possible action.  I'll add that Wikipedia has articles, not mere "pages".  This is a subtle but important distinction.
 * Regarding your draft(which I've linked to above), you have not yet demonstrated that this person meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable creative professional. The sources you have cited seem to only cite the existence of the person's work and people they are associated with.  Please see Your First Article.  The good news is that your draft was only declined, not rejected, so reviewers think it is at least possible to show notability. 331dot (talk) 19:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

19:44:38, 14 July 2021 review of submission by Mjakarlin
The reason given for declining the submission was that it was not supported by reliable sources. However, I could not tell which part of the article was not properly supported. I need to know this so that I can improve the article. I am including here some detail on the work I did

I Picked Up a Celebrity on the Street is a Korean television series. Wikipedia has innumerable articles describing Korean television series. (I've improved many of them because they were written by non-native English speakers and I have improved the usage and sometimes significantly improved the synopses.) I tried to follow the format of those articles. Most of these have about the same amount of supporting sources - sometimes less.

This particular series is currently available for streaming on viki.com, a major international streamer. I drew information from Viki, from IMDb, and from HanCinema, all of which are reliable sources. There is also a Korean Wikipedia entry for the series, which I did not reference because it's a little on the thin side, but I could do so if that would help. I also used other Wikipedia articles to verify the series existence, including the Wikipedia article for YG Entertainment, a huge Korean entertainment company whose subsidiary produced the show. Finally, I found a couple of articles that refer to the series and the participation of its star Sung Hoon, whose Wikipedia and IMDb pages also confirm his participation (Wikipedia pages for shows never cross-reference to IMDb pages of the performers).

I wrote the synopsis myself from having watched the series - is that a problem? I don't think it can be because there are numerous Korean dramas with Wikipedia entries with synopses and plot descriptions that are far more detailed than can be found elsewhere online and which rarely include significant supporting references.

Finally, could it be the cast list that's the problem? The list of the principal actors and the director are all given in the three main sources I cite (viki, IMDb and HanCinema). Some of the other information comes from MyDramaList. For some reason, a Wikipedia bot would not allow me to cite to MyDramaList, but I didn't understand the explanation. Please take a look at MyDramaList. It is full of detailed information about numerous Asian movies and shows. Could you let me know why it is not an accepted reliable source? If I removed some of the cast listing, especially the special appearances, would that make a difference?

To sum up - this article seems to me to be of a piece with numerous similar articles and it would be really helpful to understand in what way it was not reliably sourced.

Mjakarlin (talk) 19:44, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Mjakarlin (talk) 19:44, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The synopsis does not need to be sourced (the implication being that the show itself can be used to verify it), but the sources you have aren't terribly useful. The Korea Herald article is a non-sequitur (i.e. it doesn't even name-drop the series, merely giving a plot synopsis) and Viki is connected to the subject (the page notes it's exclusive to that service). Soompi is the only source that comes close to usability, and even then we can't use it because the article is so short. —<i style="color: #1E90FF;">A little blue Bori</i>  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 23:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

20:40:21, 14 July 2021 review of submission by 76.240.112.154
please assist plenty articles on this actor to verify

76.240.112.154 (talk) 20:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, and no amount of editing can change that. 331dot (talk) 21:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Any further threads you make on this topic will be reverted off. You're not listening to anyone, and we are under no obligation to reply to what amounts to the same thread being created ad nauseam by someone who clearly has no desire to accept criticism. —<i style="color: #1E90FF;">A little blue Bori</i>  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 23:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)