Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 22

= July 22 =

01:05:40, 22 July 2021 review of draft by Rybkovich
Hi, Draft:One World Family Commune got rejected on copyright grounds, I believe it was due to quoted info being too long. Can you run another check and let me know if there are still problems. Thank you Rybkovich (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC) Rybkovich (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Copyright Violations are a serious problem. You will likely need to reword the draft entirely if you want to ensure that your submission isn’t declined on copyvio grounds again. Please read WP:COPYVIO in its entirety. Eternal Shadow   Talk  16:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Listen, I'm a copyright attorney so I am familiar with copyright issues. If the issue with content within other articles - it 99% likely that I am the creator of that content. Copyright is an authorship issue. An author cannot violate her own work. Yes, our policy is different from copyright law, let me know which articles so I can make sufficient changes. It is much easier to reject articles than spending months to create them. In my work everything is cited, I'm the author of published articles in two different languages, I write motions and petitions in court. Some frustrations are silly while others are justified. You know this personally both in your life and here on wikipedia. Work is work whether you get paid for it or not and its especially frustrating when its work that one is passionate about. If our bot tells you the specific copyright issue what the problem of copy and pasting it so it can be addressed ASAP. I am an administrator on wikicommons, specifically regarding rejection or acceptance of uploads, with copyright being the primary issue. I have previously posted my request politely - two times here - NO RESPONSE - 7/11/2021 and 7/13/2021. Two times on the administrator's that rejected my submission talk page, AntanO - 7/11/2021 and 7/14/2021 - NO RESPONSE. The response to today's posting is that there's a copyright issue. Hence the frustration. Rybkovich (talk) 17:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * As a copyright lawyer, you should be aware of Berne granting all-rights-reserved copyright to a work by default, without need of registration. All-rights-reserved copyright is mutually exclusive with CC-By-SA, which is why even if you wrote it yourself, we cannot accept it unless it was initially released under that copyright licence or a functionally identical one. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 20:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * , I have just checked the draft, as of now there is no copyright problem. I have not checked previous versions. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much Roger, I really appreciate it. Rybkovich (talk) 20:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

01:41:31, 22 July 2021 review of submission by ItsJustdancefan
What next steps should I take? ItsJustdancefan (talk) 01:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * @, following this, this & this what would follow is an indefinite block on your account for not being here to build an encyclopedia, what did I tell you about forum shopping ? Celestina007 (talk) 02:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

2021-22 Premira Devision (Women)
I created a page called Draft:2021–22 Primera División (women) on Wikipedia on 21 July 2021 at about 11 o'clock AEST but today I got a notification that the article has been declined and I want to know what the reason(s) is/are however I understand that did not leave any preference in that article. Please let me know. Zaki Frahmand (talk) 22 July 2021 12:25 PM AEST.
 * Pictogram voting comment.svg Hello. It appears that your submission to Articles for Creation was declined because it lacked reliable sources. Please note that Wikipedia requires third-party, independent sources for an article to be considered notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you need further help on what sources could be considered reliable, please visit the help desk. Thank you. Eternal Shadow   Talk  15:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

02:30:27, 22 July 2021 review of submission by Chatterjee95
Chatterjee95 (talk) 02:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ should be merged to Tiger Shroff unless significantly expanded, as it is lacking reliable, secondary sources still. Eternal Shadow   Talk  15:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

02:41:36, 22 July 2021 review of submission by SYYA96
Due to the pandemic, there has been major coverage on Zühlke Group, especially the successful development of the NHS Test and Trace application. They are now known as the NHS Covid-19 developer. Hence, it will be best if there is a English page available on Zühlke and their project. SYYA96 (talk) 02:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Your draft was rejected meaning it won’t be considered further. Eternal Shadow   Talk  03:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

03:22:13, 22 July 2021 review of draft by Coon923
I do not understand exactly what else to do, if what I am doing will not work with Wikipedia, then please delete draft; I do not want to waste anymore of my time if this page is not publishable, nor do I want to waste Wikipedia support team time.

Thank You, Coon923(Almighty Coon)

Coon923 (talk) 03:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it probably won't work with Wikipedia to write about your own work. Very rarely are unofficial video game mods notable. That being said, the biggest issue with the article is a lack of reliable sources. We don't normally consider Youtube a reliable source (because they are often self-published, and the information is unverifiable), and the GooglePlay store just shows that it exists, it doesn't really add any significant coverage to the article. Has there been coverage of your work on notable videogame sites (Kotaku, Polygon, IGN, etc.)?
 * I don't want you to be discouraged. Seems like you made a really interesting mod! That's more that I can do. Even if this article doesn't make it, I still invite you to continue to provide your expertise on video game related topics here. We could always use more volunteers! If you'd like us to delete the draft, then go ahead and put at the top of the page, and someone will delete it for you. Bkissin (talk) 15:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

04:09:25, 22 July 2021 review of draft by 45ispres
I got notification back concerning my article on the Jacksonville Sheriff Mike Williams^. The person who declined a submission said that there were no reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. I used references such as the Florida Sheriff's Association and the sheriff page on the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office website. I do not know exactly what this person wants me to do concerning the article 45ispres (talk) 04:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Those are primary sources, not secondary sources. You should add articles in the news about him, as they will likely lead to an accept of your submission. It seems the subject is notable enough to have a chance at acceptance. Eternal Shadow   Talk  16:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

04:12:00, 22 July 2021 review of draft by 182.74.22.30
We needed help to understand in depth all the reasons why our request has been declined on 21st July,2021 and also is publishing on sandbox right?

182.74.22.30 (talk) 04:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting comment.svg Hello. It appears that your submission to Articles for Creation was declined because it lacked reliable sources. Please note that Wikipedia requires third-party, independent sources for an article to be considered notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you need further help on what sources could be considered reliable, please visit the help desk. Thank you. Eternal Shadow   Talk  15:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * In addition, it appears you may have a conflict of interest or paid to create that page. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID. Eternal Shadow   Talk  15:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

07:15:06, 22 July 2021 review of submission by BMMWikiedit
please suggest how to improve the article which totally qualifies as Bible Medicine is a unique kind of ministry that emphasises the Bible as a medicine to people. BMMWikiedit (talk) 07:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC) BMMWikiedit (talk) 07:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. Your submission was deleted as a blatant advertisement. Please read WP:G11 and WP:PROMO. Eternal Shadow   Talk  15:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

08:53:27, 22 July 2021 review of submission by RAJESH CHAUHAN 47
RAJESH CHAUHAN 47 (talk) 08:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. You didn’t ask a question, but your submission was deleted as a blatant advertisement. Please read WP:PROMO. Eternal Shadow   Talk  15:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

09:47:13, 22 July 2021 review of submission by Dewi339458
I just don't understand, I understand the first few rejections and really have been trying to change things. Even tried deleting parts that can't be supported. I am asking for help, help me fix it because I really am trying my best. Please. Help me and allow me to prove myself. Dewi339458 (talk) 09:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No amount of editing can confer notability on a subject. It appears that the person does not meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable musician. This is why the draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. I would suggest that you spend time editing existing articles first, to learn more about notability. 331dot (talk) 10:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, yes i understand, but he isn't a musician. He's an upcoming rising actor that starred in a movie that was released in his country and malaysia making him an international actor and popular tv shows. The articles i put as sources shows articles of his career existing as he is notable in Indonesia and malaysia for now. Dewi339458 (talk) 20:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ As mentioned before, No amount of editing can confer notability on a subject. The subject fails WP:NACTOR. Also, do you have a conflict of interest with your submission? Eternal Shadow   Talk  15:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No, i know the rules regarding conflict of interest

Dewi339458 (talk) 18:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

09:53:40, 22 July 2021 review of submission by Purushothaman2939
Purushothaman2939 (talk) 09:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was deleted as a blatant advertisement. 331dot (talk) 10:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

13:44:37, 22 July 2021 review of submission by Daphinevadhera
Hi Admin, Richa Tilokani is an upcoming author. After writing successfully for different publications, she has released her first book - The Teachings of Bhagavad Gita - Timeless wisdom for the Modern Age. The book brings out the essence of the Gita in a simplified manner which makes the common man understand easier. Hope she will also pen a few more in the coming years. This Wikipedia page will help readers to know her better. Please suggest to me how to go about it. Thanks

Daphinevadhera (talk) 13:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ Your draft was rejected, meaning it cannot be resubmitted, as it is not notable. No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. Eternal Shadow   Talk  15:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

15:30:28, 22 July 2021 review of submission by Nishantkumar930
Nishantkumar930 (talk) 15:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. You didn’t ask a question, but your submission was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. Eternal Shadow   Talk  15:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

19:43:50, 22 July 2021 review of draft by Soft.hearted09
Soft.hearted09 (talk) 19:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. no sources, no article, no debate. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 20:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

20:18:32, 22 July 2021 review of submission by Misser420
Hello, I have written an article about a Japanese mobile game called Tagatame no Alchemist. Apparently, it got rejected, and labeled with "not adequately supported by reliable sources". I do not understand why there is not enough reliable sources? I took most of them from the Japanese version of the wiki, and added some extra based on the information I added. Because it is translated, I had to find other sources, even if they are in Japanese. The game is a Japanese game, so I do not understand what information requires more sources? (I do not see what sources are lacking) Even if there are english sources, they are not reliable because the page I created is based on the Japanese version of the page, so I have copied the Japanese page's sources and not sure which more do I need. Also, which sources are unreliable? I have checked the sources, and they are not other wikis, or sources like reddit/twitter. They are mostly news publications or official company websites, or other game guide websites, and the wiki does not list any game guide websites as unreliable. English sources are much more unreliable than Japanese ones since the information I posted specifies Japanese individuals, making it hard to find information. From what I am aware, I am not sure which ones are unreliable, but the sources I have used are:

onlinefanatic.com (game reviews website) eiga.com (Japanese movies review site) movies.yahoo.co.jp (Yahoo.co.jp is Japan's equivalent of google, one of the biggest search engine used by people in Japan other than Google) satelite.co.jp (A movie producer's official website) 4gamer.net (Japanese game outlet for reviews and entertainment news) alchemistcode.com (official US based website for the game) al.fg-games.co.jp (The japanese website for the game) sensortower.com (mobile games application database) anilist.co (anime database) natalie.mu (Japanese pop culture news, according to website description) spice.eplus.jp (entertainment news in Japan) myanimelist.net (anime database and review site) crunchyroll.com (paid anime streaming website) tracxn.com (corporate tracking and database website providing IT services) famitsu.com (game reviews website) tistory.com (one of the several korean blog website)

I have checked the criteria, and do not understand what exactly is the requirement for notability, if review websites/gaming entertainment news or corporate websites/official websites of games are not notable enough.

Misser420 (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)