Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 23

= July 23 =

02:04:07, 23 July 2021 review of submission by NHPolitics603
NHPolitics603 (talk) 02:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Burns was elected countywide in the largest county in NH and he served on a national position on Donald Trump's 2016 campaign. He is also a major candidate for congress.
 * as has been noted, countywide office doesn't pass political notability and neither does being a candidate. Should Burns be elected for congress then an article will rapidly follow Nosebagbear (talk) 10:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

05:46:21, 23 July 2021 review of draft by 45ispres
He gets significant coverage on news stations and other places. I want to know how the sheriff of the 13th largest city in America in one of the biggest departments does not "qualify" for man article especially because he has been a very controversial sheriff. Do I need more secondary sources to make this able to become an article? I am confused as there is so much mixed messaging

45ispres (talk) 05:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * as an elected official, he may need to pass political notability, which it is unlikely a sheriff of a city (even a large one) can do. The mayor would likely be notable, but not the sheriff.


 * He would need in-ordinate amounts of reliable, independent secondary coverage to overcome that basis. Currently, sources 3 & 4 are primary, and 1 & 2 are (or functionally are) interviews, and therefore do not meet independent requirement. You want reliable secondary sources that talk *about* the subject Nosebagbear (talk) 10:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

05:54:48, 23 July 2021 review of draft by Wikimusicplaystation
Wikimusicplaystation (talk) 05:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

hi....I just want to ask why my articles is being denied. can you help me with this?


 * It's not clear that he passes the criteria for a musician's article. If you're indicating that criterion #1 is met, you should clarify which three sources are the best for doing so Nosebagbear (talk) 10:58, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Request on 11:34:54, 23 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Mehedi Hasan Jakaria
Mehedi Hasan Jakaria (talk) 11:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but the draft was deleted as a blatant advertisement or promotional piece. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please see the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 12:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

14:29:30, 23 July 2021 review of submission by 216.174.70.236
The article is not only a paraphrase but a genuine historical biography of the subject who was Karađorđe's leading commanders.

216.174.70.236 (talk) 14:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It appears he does not meet the Wikipedia definition of a notable soldier. 331dot (talk) 14:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

15:11:03, 23 July 2021 review of submission by Mountain Instructor
Hi, just looking to create a similar page to the Mountain Leader Award page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Leader_Award

But devoted to one of the other main qualifications for outdoor instruction in the UK which is the Rock Climbing Instructor award with info for those looking to understand what the award covers, and the process for achieving the award. Would it help to have more links to similar awards? The Mountain Training website is the most relevant source as they administer the award just like the Mountain Leader qualification. Should the link to the blog post detailing changes to the award be removed? Or does the page just need more information and links?

Thanks.

Mountain Instructor (talk) 15:11, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Your draft was deleted as a copyright violation and blatant advertising. The Mountain Leader Award article should probably be deleted as well for not being notable, so pointless basing your draft on that one.Theroadislong (talk) 15:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

15:38:44, 23 July 2021 review of draft by Carrabre
Hey there! i'm trying to write an article for Presearch, but it was declined. I'd like to know what parts specifically caused it and what i can do to fix it. I'd appreciate your help!

Carrabre (talk) 15:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft is sourced to nothing but the website itself or announcements of its activities. A Wikipedia article must not merely tell about the subject and what it does; it must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company.  Wikipedia is not interested in what the company says about itself or in mere announcements of its activities.  Please read Your First Article.
 * If you are associated with this company, you must review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on formal disclosures you may be required to make. 331dot (talk) 15:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

I have a lot of mentions outside of just the citations from the website, if you go to the sources section at the bottom you can see them. Is there someone who can help get the draft up to speed? What specifically are the areas that sound like an advertisement? Carrabre (talk) 22:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Carrabre
 * We don't want mentions, we want in depth, significant coverage not prompted by the company itself and not a mere announcement. As it is a draft, you may work on it yourself should you have proper sources and can write neutrally. Please comply with the policies I describe above. 331dot (talk) 22:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

15:48:40, 23 July 2021 review of submission by TheTechRobo3641
I don't know how LinuxFormat, is not reliable. It's a very well known magazine.

Are Wikipedia admins categorised, i.e. some will work on things related to computers, since they're knowledgable about that, others would work on history, etc...?

TheTechRobo (talk) 15:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Anyone may review drafts, not just administrators. Users may indicate areas of interest or expertise, but there is no requirement that one be an expert in the subjects they are interested in, because Wikipedia primarily summarizes what independent reliable sources state.  The sources you offered seem to be largely routine announcements or press release type stores.  A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability. 331dot (talk) 16:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

15:55:33, 23 July 2021 review of submission by Shatbhisha6
The subject of the article is well renowned religious figure in India, he has millions of followers. The reasons to reject and then decline the article hold no ground. The person who has objection is very much working on the leftist agenda that Wikipedia is drawing flak for. The one who has declined the article is blocked for sockpuppetry, the reasons are obvious. Both these people have been working on the same agenda hand in gloves with each other. There is countless coverage across Indian media to prove notability of the subject.

Shatbhisha6 (talk) 15:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * See Articles for deletion/Swami Avdheshanand Giri (2nd nomination). Theroadislong (talk) 16:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

16:14:47, 23 July 2021 review of submission by Mojarra69
In your definition of criteria for a book to be notable, it says: A book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:

The book has been the subject[1] of two or more non-trivial[2] published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself.[3] This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists,[4] and reviews.

I have supplied several reviews by legitimate sources even though I only need one per your definition. Please reconsider my submission for inclusion to Wikipedia. I will add more content to it once I have been approved. Mojarra69 (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Facebook, Goodreads and Amazon are NOT reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 16:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

17:27:58, 23 July 2021 review of submission by 2A00:23C8:640A:5901:69D9:BD64:64B9:2259
I do not understand why my article was declined. The reviewer said that "It looks like it was copy and pasted from somewhere", but I do not understand what this means, and frankly, why it matters. I have not copy and pasted anything into my draft. 2A00:23C8:640A:5901:69D9:BD64:64B9:2259 (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * We don't want copy pasted content. There are legal issues with doing so. Your draft has no independent reliable sources to support its content. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. 331dot (talk) 17:30, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

17:32:46, 23 July 2021 review of submission by Misser420
Hello, I have recently posted a request/helpdesk help on 20:18:32, 22 July 2021. In case it didn't appear, instead of posting again (I had to revert a page error since I didn't add the draft page back then, so it might have been ignored/hidden due to the page revert to fix the edit source thing when I attempted to add the draft using that way. I think it might have actually disappeared or not visible for everyone else other than me as a result tbh), I have posted the date/time on this request. If it's not visible, please reply here, otherwise please help me with this request.

Misser420 (talk) 17:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes it is visible. It appears your submission lacks secondary sources needed to indicate notability. If you add secondary sources then it may be accepted. Eternal Shadow   Talk  19:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

18:08:38, 23 July 2021 review of submission by Aren55555
Drake (the rapper) was featured on a song by Smiley this week. I was looking into information on Smiley and there didn't seem to be a page yet, so I added it.

Aren55555 (talk) 18:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Being in a song with a notable person such as drake does not make one notable. Your submission was rejected as well, with no option to resubmit. Eternal Shadow   Talk  19:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

18:30:22, 23 July 2021 review of draft by 8.3.90.163
8.3.90.163 (talk) 18:30, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello - I need assistance because my draft says it is being marked as an autobiography based on some edits I made to grammar and the relevance of factual information; none of the edits I made are one sided or opinionated, it is all factual, neutral information. I would appreciate a review of the article to tell me what sections appear to be problematic, but I think it is all actually all fine and would not like the article to get disapproved for making these edits.

Thank you,

John
 * It appears you may have a conflict of interest. Please read WP:COI. Eternal Shadow   Talk  19:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

19:43:05, 23 July 2021 review of submission by Zacharyb366
Zacharyb366 (talk) 19:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please see the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 20:40, 23 July 2021 (UTC)