Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 4

= July 4 =

05:30:54, 4 July 2021 review of submission by Champ Imi model
Champ Imi model (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Repeated re-submission without doing anything to address the issues raised in prior declines is grounds for a rejection or deletion. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 08:07, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * In addition, if you are not Champ Imi himself, you should not be using that username and if you are, you should not be writing about yourself on Wikipedia. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 08:08, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

06:49:11, 4 July 2021 review of submission by Ajaya Kumar Behera 1
Ajaya Kumar Behera 1 (talk) 06:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, we are interested in what independent reliable sources say about you, not what you want to say about yourself.  If you just want to tell the world about yourself, you should use your preferred social media outlet. 331dot (talk) 07:44, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

08:42:27, 4 July 2021 review of submission by Jackson's official
Jackson&#39;s official (talk) 08:42, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Your sourcing is still very much useless. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 20:48, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

08:44:35, 4 July 2021 review of submission by Jackson's official
Jackson&#39;s official (talk) 08:44, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You didn’t ask a question, although your draft was rejected, meaning it will no longer be considered. Eternal Shadow   Talk  18:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

08:50:09, 4 July 2021 review of submission by Flobroderick
I have now had this submission rejected twice in spite of there being reliable, verifiable sources such as main newspapers in Spain (Expansion), TechCrunch and Crunchbase. Please can someone advise me on any other ways I might be able to get this published? This is a legitimate company with more than 25 employees and they just want a simple non-marketing page on Wikipedia.

Flobroderick (talk) 08:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * We have zero interest in what the company wants, they fail WP:NCORP and the draft is just advertising from the very first word. Theroadislong (talk) 08:58, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't have to be marketing or soliciting customers to be promotional. Wikipedia is not for merely providing information and not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves. They should do that on their own website. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I see that you declared a COI. If you are an employee or otherwise a paid representative, the Terms of Use require you to make the stricter paid editing declaration. 331dot (talk) 11:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

20:13:21, 4 July 2021 review of submission by Premviswabharathi
I am creating wikipage for my friend who is running a study center for different universities. The institution name is Viswabharathi open school. May I know how I can do this. What I am doing is getting rejected. Premviswabharathi (talk) 20:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has articles, not wikipages. The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about something; it is a place to summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a topic, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Sice you say you are working for a friend, please review conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 20:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)