Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 June 13

= June 13 =

05:33:55, 13 June 2021 review of submission by Oceanwww
Oceanwww (talk) 05:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Curbon7 (talk) 08:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

09:21:36, 13 June 2021 review of submission by KausikKhamaru
I have seen that the schools listed in the wikipedia are written in this way. In some places there is much less information like Guptipara High School, Abhinav Bharti High School Asansol Arunoday High School (H.S).Even then, those are the available in wikipedia.Then why my article was rejected sir? Please tell me. KausikKhamaru (talk) 09:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi . Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It contains high quality articles and poor quality articles. Articles about schools are an interesting case. They have long been required to be notable in order to be included, but for many years there was a parallel contradictory practice that as long as they were high schools or above and could be proven to exist, they would not be deleted.


 * The inconsistency was more or less resolved a few years ago, and substandard school articles are gradually being improved or deleted. The existence of articles that do not meet Wikipedia's current policies and guidelines does not mean they are "allowed". It may simply mean that no one has gotten around to deleting them yet. They are not a good excuse to create more such articles. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. If you're interested in making Wikipedia better, try to improve the three article you pointed out, and if that isn't possible, nominate them for deletion. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

09:22:51, 13 June 2021 review of submission by Priyarits
Priyarits (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , This draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Anyways, this draft is completely unsourced. Curbon7 (talk) 11:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

09:23:59, 13 June 2021 review of submission by KausikKhamaru
please advice me how to edit. KausikKhamaru (talk) 09:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , A reviewer deemed that this subject is not sufficiently notable for inclusion, per our notability guideline for schools. This draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Curbon7 (talk) 11:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll also give you some tips for editing on your talk page! Curbon7 (talk) 11:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

09:24:35, 13 June 2021 review of submission by Priyarits
It was mistake so please review my page. Priyarits (talk) 09:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , This draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Anyways, this draft is completely unsourced. A tip for next time: Reliable sources must be provided in order to prove a subject's notability. Curbon7 (talk) 11:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

10:23:09, 13 June 2021 review of submission by Xinthelab
Xinthelab (talk) 10:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above user was indef'd for promotional edits, likely on the now-deleted draft. Curbon7 (talk) 11:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

12:15:52, 13 June 2021 review of submission by Jackrobert007
I think this article I’ve added should be sufficient enough to meet the notability standards: https://gilavalleycentral.net/yee-announces-run-for-governor/ Jackrobert007 (talk) 12:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , First of all, the subject of your draft is not notable, per WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Secondly, the article you provide here has literally nothing to do with the subject. Thirdly, this draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Curbon7 (talk) 12:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * To clarify, merely seeking public office does not merit that person a Wikipedia article. If they win, or are notable for something else, maybe. 331dot (talk) 12:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

16:10:06, 13 June 2021 review of submission by GYG1977
GYG1977 (talk) 16:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * draft was rejected meaning it will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 16:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

16:10:53, 13 June 2021 review of submission by GYG1977
GYG1977 (talk) 16:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

19:38:57, 13 June 2021 review of submission by Mh.mahadi111
Mh.mahadi111 (talk) 19:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Just blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

22:16:15, 13 June 2021 review of submission by Jisan.thecoder
Jisan.thecoder (talk) 22:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves or post their resume. Please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 22:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)