Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 June 17

= June 17 =

02:28:21, 17 June 2021 review of submission by Goodlug
Since my article is rejected, is it possible for the reviewer to review it again? I have already removed most of the content that sounds promotional. Goodlug (talk) 02:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , the draft has been rejected, which means it will not be considered further. However, you are always welcome to try again by making another draft; if you're gonna remake it, please take the reviewers comments into consideration. I note that there is actually in-depth independent coverage of the company, so it may just be notable, per WP:NCORP. Tldr, make it less of an ad next time. Good luck! Curbon7 (talk) 06:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * @Goodlug this is a matter to take up with the reviewer  who rejected the draft in the first instance. Generally there is no further consideration of rejected drafts. This one has a long history of failing reviews.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 06:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I started to do some cleanup. Appears notable enough, as the leading brand of Japanese condoms, and the thinnest in the world. Now that the promo info has been cleaned up, see [] [] [] [] for coverage. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

04:23:51, 17 June 2021 review of submission by Nishant930
plz accept my artical its real and 100% geniue. Nishant930 (talk) 04:23, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Your draft has since been deleted. Wikipedia is not a place to tell the world about yourself. Please let us know if you have further questions; you may wish to read this guide to writing your first article. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Let it be noted that created the same article in the same exact promotional way about 20 minutes after the response from . Curbon7 (talk) 06:10, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

06:25:06, 17 June 2021 review of submission by Yukkalex
Hi Wikipedia,

First of all, thank you for your time reviewing our article. But, I need an assistance to complete with the reference section. Would you please to tell us which references didn't meet the requirement? We are fast growing startup company in Indonesia so it would be awesome if we are in Wikipedia presence. Should you have any needed informations, please let us know.

Regards,

Yukkalex (talk) 06:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , The above user was blocked for obvious reasons. Curbon7 (talk) 06:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or advertising. It is not a web host of information unrelated to Wikipedia, and it is not a social network. If you want to let people know about your company, please use an advertising company or LinkedIn or the like, but not Wikipedia. See also WP:COI.  Java Hurricane  06:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

06:42:18, 17 June 2021 review of submission by Ks123wiki
Ks123wiki (talk) 06:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , The draft has no sources. Also, this is clearly non-notable. Curbon7 (talk) 06:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Addendum: the creation is likely a hoax or otherwise a fictional creation of the author. There is no evidence that the TV show mentioned in the draft even exists in the first place.  Java Hurricane  06:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Request on 11:17:39, 17 June 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Haran Yakir
Hi, I'm trying to create this article about a notable scientist. I am unexperienced in editing wikipedia and hoped that someone else can take over finishing the draft. He has many scientific citations, but this is not my area of expertise. He has also received the Israel Prize for 2019 for his scientific contributions. The article has been rejected twice, but only due to my ineptitude at adding sources properly. Surely there are experienced editors who can finish and publish this article?

Haran Yakir (talk) 11:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * @Haran Yakir please read this essay which handles many things including researching sources. We all start out inexperienced. You will easily be able to  bring this work to  a conclusion.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 11:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I think if you disclosed your connection to the subject on your talk page, based on your similar last names, other editors would be more willing to help you with the sourcing. Please see WP:COI. This was already mentioned on your talk page. Another editor has looked up the Google scholar citations and feels Dan Yakir is notable - so this just needs better referencing to succeed. TechnoTalk (talk) 19:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

13:54:28, 17 June 2021 review of submission by Hasan924044
Hasan924044 (talk) 13:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Hello.

This is my page link Draft:Court of Nobility

I want to create it for my client. And it's not approved. Can you please tell me what was the problem and how can I solve this problem and published it?

Thanks,
 * The draft was deleted as a copyright infringement. Wikipedia content may not be copied from elsewhere. A Wikipedia article should summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a topic, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. If you are editing for a client, the Terms of use require you to make a formal paid editing declaration(click for instructions). You should also review conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 14:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

16:14:36, 17 June 2021 review of draft by Smilingbandit
Smilingbandit (talk) 16:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * There are some suggestions for improving the draft on the draft page. TechnoTalk (talk) 19:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

16:26:48, 17 June 2021 review of submission by RoanokeVirginia
I recently submitted this draft article and it was declined for not demonstrating notability. It is my belief as the investment fund of the Irish government, with significant press coverage, it qualifies for notability. Therefore, I would appreciate any guidance on where to take the article next to demonstrate notability.

RoanokeVirginia (talk) 16:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft simply summarizes the actions of the fund. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources have chosen on their own to say about the fund(not just report on its activities), showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability.  Sovereign wealth funds are probably notable, but you need to summarize what is said about the fund and its importance.  331dot (talk) 17:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks @331dot, I appreciate the feedback RoanokeVirginia (talk) 17:10, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

16:35:26, 17 June 2021 review of submission by Heartlandfem
This article was declined for submission twice, on Feb. 11 and Feb. 27, 2021, because the reviewers stated that the subject was not notable and the references in the original draft did not "show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject." The second reviewer also stated that the article relied "too much on the university website as a source and needs to incorporate more secondary sources." Since that time I have significantly revised the article to include additional references from secondary sources and to remove or revise language that was similar to language on the university website. For example, the original draft included links to all the courses offered by the school, which I have removed. There are now 22 references listed for the article and only 4 of them are links to the university website. These references include news articles from several established TV stations and newspapers, including the Dayton Daily News, as well as the websites of organizations that review and evaluate higher education institutions. I also tried to add category tags that were more appropriate to the subject, including Category:Higher education and Category:Satellite Campuses. It has been almost four months since the draft was last reviewed and I would like to know if it will be reviewed again or if there is something more I should do to get it accepted. Heartlandfem (talk) 16:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Heartlandfem (talk) 16:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You have submitted it for review and it is pending. This could take several months, so you will need to be patient. 331dot (talk) 16:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

20:21:34, 17 June 2021 review of submission by 2698632941q
Hello, I’ve submitted reliable notable source as cites for this artist rockin rose

2698632941q (talk) 20:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 20:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Since I’ve submitted several times of this topic never get approved. This topic artist is eligible for submission as wiki requires the notable artist needs to be a signed with major record label with 3 albums. Then this artist rockin rose is obviously meet the requirements people can check the truth via press ;google knowledge panel;or just via Spotify song credit;Apple Music album info;YouTube content info,I also see other artist on wiki they even provided Spotify song link and Apple Music album link as a reference and they get approved for wiki. Some of them are even not notable not signed with a major label as required. I also provided many press as references, also I found many major news websites such as China Net ease, Tencent News, 163.com; Phoenix China( ifeng AKA fenghuang wang);China people news all recorded this topic Artist’s content. But I didn’t submit those Chinese news reports but if it worked for Wiki I can definitely provide them, I see other famous artist listed on wiki had press on above sites as reference cites. So Please tell me Is the above press nets reliable enough? Do I still need to provide these major China news? Thank you 2698632941q (talk) 20:36, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Please place further comments in this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. "signed with major record label with 3 albums" is not one of the listed notability criteria for musicians.  Please read other stuff exists; that other inappropriate articles exist does not mean that yours can too.  We can only address the inappropriate articles that we know about; as this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible to get inappropriate articles by us.  That an article exists does not mean that it has been "approved" by anyone. Article standards also change over time, so that what was once acceptable is no longer.  If you want to help us out, you could identify some of these other inappropriate articles on musicians that you have seen for possible action. If this musician is not notable, no amount of editing can confer notability upon them.  331dot (talk) 20:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi I don’t know how to not to open a new section.. As your previous answer that topic rockin rose been rejected so it means can it never submit again been banned forever?even it’s been notable further? Or this topic rockin rose can still submit for review and approved? 2698632941q (talk) 21:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are using the mobile version or app, switch to using the full desktop version in a browser on your device; once you do, there should be an "edit" link in the section header, or you can click "edit" at the top of this page and locate this section in the edit window. This way you avoid creating new sections.
 * The rejection does not mean that the subject is prohibited from Wikipedia for all time. If notability changes in the future, the matter can be revisited. 331dot (talk) 21:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

20:27:20, 17 June 2021 review of submission by TJTL1127
Hi - Thank you for reviewing my submission for the Harrigan Learning Center and Museum. I would like more information on why the page creation was declined so I can attempt again to create one.

A little backstory - this is my first time creating a page. The Learning Center and Museum is smackdab in rural Maine and trying to be a draw for the impoverished area. The curator added the museum on the list of Museums in Maine page that Wikipedia has and realized the entries had pages and asked for me to assist in creating a page. The museum is relatively new, so facts are sparse (having been established in 2016, and of course being mostly shut down or at limited capacity during the pandemic). It has managed to pick up a fair amount of local media attention, so there are multiple sources to cite in the creation. I think it is deserving of a Wikipedia page, is noteworthy in the area, and for general attention. Long story short - any assistance to help me get a page up would greatly be appreciated.

TJTL1127 (talk) 20:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft does little more than tell of the existence of the museum. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the museum, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. Most reviewers look for at least three such sources to be present and summarized.
 * Please review conflict of interest(since you have been in communication with the museum curator). Wikipedia has articles, not mere "pages". 331dot (talk) 20:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Review of submission by Skoskoexoso122122222a
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rich_Kleiman_(1) Trying to get the page of kevin durant partner and business manager live. Looking for assistance. Skoskoexoso122122222a (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above draft was accepted shortly after this posting. Curbon7 (talk) 23:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

23:07:31, 17 June 2021 review of draft by Skinflint13
Hello, I am writing to request assistance editing my first article. Since it was declined initially, I added multiple citations to substantiate, but I'm not sure whether it is in the queue for another review? Skinflint13 (talk) 23:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , you have to press the big blue resubmit button at the bottom of the red template in order to resubmit your draft. As a secondary note, please ensure that all of the sources are reliable. Neither YouTube nor primary sources are considered reliable. Curbon7 (talk) 23:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)