Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 June 18

= June 18 =

05:03:08, 18 June 2021 review of submission by AdrewMax
AdrewMax (talk) 05:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

why my article has been declined??AdrewMax (talk) 05:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * the reason for the decline is given in the large pink box at the top of the draft:


 * Do you have any questions about it? Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

How to edit my article and add reference sections??

09:02:16, 18 June 2021 review of submission by Ag.abhinavgautam
this is Abhinav Gautam, I created my draft page, biography. all i did all thinks references and links, please help me to edit and correct. Ag.abhinavgautam (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. Please see the autobiography policy. If you meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person or a notable actor, an independent editor will eventually take note of your career and choose to write about you.  Please note that a Wikipedia article is not necessarily desirable. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

10:44:29, 18 June 2021 review of submission by 2401:4900:3B01:27E7:C87E:F7E9:21B1:FC43
2401:4900:3B01:27E7:C87E:F7E9:21B1:FC43 (talk) 10:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question. 331dot (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Request on 12:04:04, 18 June 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 223.235.240.200
223.235.240.200 (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * nothing in the draft suggests that you are notable in Wikipedia's terms. Theroadislong (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

16:25:16, 18 June 2021 review of submission by Super30article
Super30article (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * (Courtesy link: Draft:Abdul zubarti)
 * This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Amazon is not an acceptable source, and the subject's own website does not help for notability as Wikipedia defines it. In addition, we are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every biographical claim the draft makes that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to a strong third-party source that corroborates it or (if no such sources can be found) removed wholesale. This is a HARD REQUIREMENT when editing about living people on Wikipedia and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 21:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

17:55:22, 18 June 2021 review of submission by Nur781
Nur781 (talk) 17:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. No sources, no article, no debate. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 20:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Request on 18:44:24, 18 June 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Osvaldo2007
User:KylieTastic continues deleting articles even after improvements and sources have been used.

Osvaldo2007 (talk) 18:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you mean decline, not delete? If a draft is declined again, it means that the improvements were insufficient. 331dot (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

19:34:36, 18 June 2021 review of draft by Skiman514
Currently have 1 draft article in my sandbox, awaiting re-review. How do I start another article, this about www.survivorcorps.com (Covid-19) vs exiting wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivor_Corps

Many thanks Skiman514 (talk) 19:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Skiman514 (talk) 19:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Request on 20:11:42, 18 June 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Ising4jesus
Around the end of April 2021, I created a page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:AOZ_Studio I'm new at designing Wiki pages, so I wasn't concerned when this page was placed in Draft status. I assumed that I would get some direction on what I need to do to make it meet the standards for publication.

I do have a declared COI, in that I work part time for AOZ Studio, however I've tried to be careful to describe AOZ in neutral, "matter-of-fact" style as the Wiki docs suggest.

In spite of this, I received several comments stating that it looks like advertising, however, to me, it looks like most other Wiki pages describing a programming language. So far, I have not received an adequate explanation of why it looks like advertising, or how to make it more neutral.

I understand that I need to cite more sources. I was able to find one on the Versailles Academy website (a part of the French Ministry of Education). I would think that would be considered neutral, but I got no acknowledgement one way or the other about it. I have also referenced several other related Wiki pages.

Since AOZ Studio is an updated version of AMOS Professional, I assumed that some historical references would also be acceptable. AMOS had quite extensive coverage in the late 1980s and 1990s, and still has to this day in the retro community. Would these be acceptable?

I have ***not*** been paid for work on this page, although a note was added suggesting that I was. (I'd also like to know how to get that notice removed.)

Thanks for listening! Ising4jesus (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you work for the studio, you are a paid editor. You do not have to be specifically paid to edit or specifically directed to edit. Your disclosure of this on your user page is sufficient, however. 331dot (talk) 20:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

22:32:15, 18 June 2021 review of draft by Slogewski
Wikipedia  Unsubscribe 3:02 PM (18 minutes ago) Forgive me but I am not very good at using Wikipedia. However, I have been trying to get a page up for an important Los Angeles artist Johnny Otto, [born Christopher John Otto]. My page application has been rejected twice now. I am having a difficult time understanding why since I submitted the very same footnotes that are contained on the Wikipedia page for "Art squat," a serious movement co-founded by Johnny Otto [you may read that short page to confirm the existence of the movement.]  I attempted the same confirming footnotes to Johnny Otto's page but I was again rejected for even a stub posting in spite of the fact that you accepted the same footnotes for the "Art Squat" page. I'd be grateful if you could you please advise me on this. I am not sure to whom I should submit this request to, so I will submit it to one or two other editors. Thanks for your help. Yours truly, Herbert Slojewski, Glendale, CA, email:  h.slojewski@gmail.com

1. "Writing's on the wall for art squat", Sydney Morning Herald, January 27, 2009. Retrieved 2013-06-02. Jonathan Jones, "The closure of Berlin's Tacheles squat is a sad day for alternative art", 2. Jonathan Jones on Art (blog), The Guardian, September 5, 2012. Retrieved 2013-06-02. 3. "In Paris, Art Fills the Void", The New York Times (travel), January 26, 2010. Retrieved 2013-06-02. 4. "JOHNNY OTTO / OTTOPHOBIA / Conspiracy + Propaganda = Art | Art Reveal". www.artrevealmagazine.com

Herbert Slojewski 22:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every biographical claim the draft makes that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to a strong third-party source that corroborates it or (if no such sources can be found) removed wholesale. This is a HARD REQUIREMENT when editing about living people on Wikipedia and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. See Help:Referencing for beginners as to how to format references. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 03:13, 19 June 2021 (UTC)