Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 June 29

= June 29 =

00:36:28, 29 June 2021 review of submission by CaptainJohn21
CaptainJohn21 (talk) 00:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

09:28:08, 29 June 2021 review of draft by Cxxisroy
Hi,my submission had been declined so many times, I just can't understand the relevant reason you gave to me that the reference does not show the significant coverage, the references I cited were the securities companies' research reports which totally focus on the research about FULONGMA.

Cxxisroy (talk) 09:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That is not what is being looked for, you must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state. Please read Your first article. If there are few or no independent sources with significant coverage, the company would not merit an article at this time. If you work for the company, please read conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 10:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

10:09:47, 29 June 2021 review of submission by Deepak Namdeo14
Deepak Namdeo14 (talk) 10:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

I had changed the content and also resource links twice but still, my article is not getting approved.

I want to know that can use the following URLs for resource links (verification) in the article Casefox.com on these pages:

https://onlineprnews.com/news/50008999-1622708383-casefox-categorized-in-the-leaders-of-legal-billing-from-getapp-in-the-leaders-report-2021.html https://www.activepractice.com/articles/casefox-overview.html https://comparecamp.com/casefox-review-pricing-pros-cons-features/ https://www.airslate.com/bot/explore/pre-fill-from-casefox-bot https://www.infotech.com/software-reviews/products/casefox https://blog.technolawyer.com/2012/04/casefox.html https://appadvice.com/app/casefox/1073623175 https://bisouv.com/world/2687383/conflict-checking-software-market-industry-analysis-with-top-players-casefox-nelson-quillin-cc-check-geni-financial-services/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepak Namdeo14 (talk • contribs) 12:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , Most of the sources cited in the draft are not reliable sources, as they are primary sources or simply are not useful in referencing the subject. Also, of the links you've rovided here, I'm not sure very many, if any, are reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curbon7 (talk • contribs)

10:54:26, 29 June 2021 review of submission by Icecoffeeallyearlong
Hello I've been collecting statues and collectibles from Prime 1 Studio for quite some time now. I'm trying to edit the wikipedia but don't know how to proceed. Please help. Icecoffeeallyearlong (talk) 10:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , I left a welcome template on your page with a series of very useful links you can check out to help you get started. As far as that draft goes, you should create a new version as I note the current draft was rejected a few months ago. Curbon7 (talk) 15:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

13:31:31, 29 June 2021 review of submission by Kstenson86
Kstenson86 (talk) 13:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Please confirm if Richard L. Greene page creation is now complete. Does it require any additional verification.
 * , Thanks for your contribution, but Richard L. Greene already has an article. You should make improvements there instead of to the draft. Curbon7 (talk) 15:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Request on 15:12:10, 29 June 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Memadigan64
Memadigan64 (talk) 15:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , you didn't ask a question. The draft must be supported by reliable sources in order to confirm notability. Curbon7 (talk) 15:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

17:44:10, 29 June 2021 review of submission by Kstenson86
Need assistance to remove the notification (top of page) on Richard L. Greene's wiki page Kstenson86 (talk) 17:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , this isn't the proper medium for discussing articles in mainspace. It would be better for you to check out the main help desk or the Teahouse. Curbon7 (talk) 17:51, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

18:20:28, 29 June 2021 review of draft by Saurabhbans87
Saurabhbans87 (talk) 18:20, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , you didn't ask a question. Also, the draft is completely unsourced. Sources are needed in order to verify notability. Curbon7 (talk) 18:58, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

19:09:40, 29 June 2021 review of draft by Nutellab
Hi! Just wondered if I could get some extra eyes on the page Draft:Photograph_magazine. I've been adding more sources and would love input. Thank you so much :) Nutellab (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

22:31:13, 29 June 2021 review of submission by Piyushdear
Piyushdear (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above draft was deleted under both G11 and G12. Curbon7 (talk) 01:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Request on 22:33:45, 29 June 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by JennilyW
My draft keeps on getting declined. It says that I don't have reliable sources, but the sources are form WP:VG/RS. That is the only place where I can find sources, unless WP:WPCPY has some. Please help me!

🍓⋆JennilyW♡🍧 (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Focusing on the specific outlets doesn't matter when the specific articles you're citing are just passing mentions. IGN, the second NintendoLife cite, Gamespot, and Upcomer don't actually discuss ILCA in any real depth. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 00:14, 30 June 2021 (UTC)