Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 June 6

= June 6 =

00:57:50, 6 June 2021 review of draft by Ramesh012
hey can you please help me to improve this article.

Ramesh012 (talk) 00:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

08:06:55, 6 June 2021 review of submission by KeerthiRajBS
Please go through the references. KeerthiRajBS (talk) 08:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

11:38:06, 6 June 2021 review of submission by 2402:3A80:183C:340A:0:8:B34F:1801
2402:3A80:183C:340A:0:8:B34F:1801 (talk) 11:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

She is an actress who famous in Tamil. Pls accept the draft — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:183C:340A:0:8:B34F:1801 (talk) 11:39, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Being "famous" is not a reason for having an article, being notable however, is. Theroadislong (talk) 12:00, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every biographical claim the article makes that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to a strong third-party source that corroborates it or (if no such sources can be found) removed wholesale. This is a HARD REQUIREMENT and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 21:45, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

11:49:16, 6 June 2021 review of submission by Spoknishu007
Spoknishu007 (talk) 11:49, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) no sources, no article, no debate. 2) We can't host copyright violations. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:15, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

12:19:30, 6 June 2021 review of submission by Tsenaba
WHY MY PAGE IS NOT PUBLISHED YET? CAN YOU RECTIFY THE MISTAKES.

Tsenaba (talk) 12:19, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * There is no need to yell(use all capital letters). As noted on your draft, "This may take 5 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,693 pending submissions waiting for review." You will need to continue to be patient. 331dot (talk) 12:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

14:36:45, 6 June 2021 review of draft by AcceptingGrey
My draft got rejected because apparently, the content is too less to require a page of its own. I find it unfair for two reasons: 1) I have seen many many pages on Wikipedia that have even lesser content than mine. Since those are published, why is mine rejected? Someone please define "sufficient content" quantitatively - number of words or paragraphs or other ways to measure please. I can resubmit accordingly. 2) I do not want to link it to the main article because (a) I feel this topic merits a page of its own (b) It will simply crowd the main page with over-information.

Please guide on the resolution. User:Missvain

AcceptingGrey (talk) 14:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see other stuff exists. Other similar articles existing does not mean that yours can too. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible to get inappropriate articles by us. We can only address what we know about. Article standards also change over time so that what was once acceptable is no longer. This is why each draft is judged on its own merits. If you are interested in helping out, you could help identify these other inappropriate articles you have seen for possible action.
 * You must summarize articles that give significant coverage to this program itself, not in the context of a larger entity. There isn't a certain number that I can give you, but most reviewers look for at least three sources. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for taking out the time to reply! My draft has 4 full sections of content and 19 cited sources. Each sentence has a reference source. I'm not able to figure out what to add/edit to support the page publishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AcceptingGrey (talk • contribs)
 * Yes, those sources don't establish that this program merits an article separate from that of the organization that operates the program. My suggestion would be to add the information to the existing article and then build a case as to why it should be separated on that article talk page. 331dot (talk) 09:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

14:59:56, 6 June 2021 review of submission by Shiuthara
Anil velichappad is a famous Indian Astrologer, Vasthu consultant as well as writer and T.V channel debater. His astrological findings can be helpful to the public who believes in Astrology and Vasthu, through Wikipedia. It would be very much appreciated once you approve my request. Shiuthara (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

---
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 15:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

18:51:29, 6 June 2021 review of draft by Ramnarayanan.rm
My submission is for the new indie movie we are making. I provided all the requested info as given for some other similar entries. Not sure why its rejected. Can you please throw some additional light on what is missing?

Ramnarayanan.rm (talk) 18:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It is not rejected, only declined. It was declined because it has almost no independent reliable sources to support its content and show that it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable film.  Not every film merits a Wikipedia article.  Please review Your First Article.
 * You must also review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures you must make. 331dot (talk) 19:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

So, wiki dont support any indie film makers who are trying to establish themselves. Its very unfortunate and discouragement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramnarayanan.rm (talk • contribs)
 * Wikipedia is not for promtional purposes such as telling the world about indie filmmakers and their work. The notability criteria and sourcing requirements apply equally to all films, regardless of if they are indie films or from a big movie studio. You may wish to find an alternative forum perhaps intended to publicize indie films, or use social media. If you have additional comment, please edit this existing section to add it, instead of creating additional sections. 331dot (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

22:56:58, 6 June 2021 review of submission by Now042021
Updated the contents. Now042021 (talk) 22:56, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Not only do you have no sources what-so-ever, this reads like an advertizement and isn't an encyclopaedia article. What is your connexion to the YouTube channel? —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 23:15, 6 June 2021 (UTC)