Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 March 25

= March 25 =

04:53:59, 25 March 2021 review of submission by Jjphoenix
I received the good news that my page, Hurricane Alice (journal), was accepted. However, when I search for it in Wikipedia, any search for "Hurricane Alice" is redirected to the page "Tropical Storm Alice." I don't know how to fix this so that those looking for Hurricane Alice the journal are able to find the page without actually having to type "Hurricane Alice (journal)". Do I create a disambiguation page? If so, what's the best way to do that? Thank you!! -- JJPHOENIX

Jjphoenix (talk) 04:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I have created a hatnote at Tropical Storm Alice, so readers can find the correct article, using redirects here Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:39, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

08:00:34, 25 March 2021 review of submission by 69.63.69.90
It's because i encourage young and up-coming artist to make it as tk khunalo 69. secondly because not that you're a swazi or black does not mean you can't be described by google. 69.63.69.90 (talk) 08:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I do not see any question but your draft has been rejected, it will not be considered any further. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If your issue is with Google searches, you will need to contact Google for assistance, though I don't believe the race or nationality of the subject plays a role in search results. Race or nationality also plays no role in accepting Wikipedia drafts. 331dot (talk) 15:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

14:42:51, 25 March 2021 review of submission by Jsolomon7
I am confused on why the references sources to Peter Jean Marie editorial is not enough for Wikipedia.

Jsolomon7 (talk) 14:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've fixed your request to add the name of the relevant draft. The sources you provided(which also are not summarized in the draft) seem to be announcements of routine business activities or interviews, which do not establish that this person meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person.  Your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

15:19:54, 25 March 2021 review of draft by Johneagle24
I need guidance on why my submission was declined. You say This content would be better suited as a section of Catholic Charismatic Renewal, to prevent WP:POVFORK. However, I would maintain that it is not a fork caused by any disputed facts, but it is about a separate geographical area. In the same way that Catholic charismatic renewal in Latin America is a separate Wikipedia article. If a separate article is not acceptable, could it be a spin off sub article? Thank you. Johneagle24 (talk) 15:19, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

17:36:37, 25 March 2021 review of draft by WallaceEMann
I am appealing the decision of rejecting my submission of Rachel Jackson (comedian). Some of the reasons given for rejection seem to be invalid given the fact that a lot of similar references are included in the page of fellow comedian Sara Pascoe - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sara_Pascoe. I also noticed something similar a few weeks ago with a British actress (I have forgotten who it was). There were very few citations and they were predominantly cast lists. How can one be rejected when others of similar, or even worse, referencing are included? WallaceEMann (talk) 17:36, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You cannot use the existence and status of other Wikipedia pages as an argument for your own, especially when it comes to drafting (which didn't exist in any real state before 2011 and wasn't made a hard requirement until 2018). In addition, we are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every biographical claim the draft makes that could be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to a strong third-party source that corroborates it. Anything less is grounds for a summary decline. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Takes a strong man to deny... 20:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

20:06:43, 25 March 2021 review of draft by 41.13.131.187
41.13.131.187 (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * No sources, no article, no debate. In addition, we are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Takes a strong man to deny... 20:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)