Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 May 23

= May 23 =

01:34:20, 23 May 2021 review of submission by AlexArticleMY
AlexArticleMY (talk) 01:34, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

01:39:34, 23 May 2021 review of submission by AlexArticleMY
Isaac Voo is famous in Malaysia... Without the In2It group, Isaac Voo is also very famous not only in Malaysia he is also known in other countries such as Indonesia. I hope wikipedia reviews it, and it should not be rejected because all the links I linked are enough to show Isaac is quite famous in Malaysia. Isaac also has many followers on his social media sites and this also proves isaac is famous.

AlexArticleMY (talk) 01:39, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The IN2IT sources don't help your case, honestly. Soonpi is too sparse. World of Buzz solicits articles and appears to have no editorial oversight. We also don't care about fame; fame is ephemeral while notability is forever. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 02:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

04:55:26, 23 May 2021 review of draft by Ltsqrd
Hello. The draft included here was recently declined. I would like to get some advice on how to improve this draft in order to get it approved for publish. Thanks in advance! Ltsqrd (talk) 04:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Ltsqrd (talk) 04:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The various YouTube videos that he has produced/starred in do not help for notability (Connexion to subject). Instagram is never a valid source for notability (No editorial oversight). Note that this article falls under the stricter standards of WP:Biographies of living persons, so these sources will NOT cut it for any claim that could potentially be challenged for any reason. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 01:25, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

15:09:53, 23 May 2021 review of submission by MrConnieGenius
I hope to successfully resubmit this article which was twice rejected as follows: 1) The first rejection was due to insufficient references and citations. Hopefully, that has been satisfactorily rectified with additional content. 2) The second rejection was due to self-promotion which I beg you to reconsider if I may explain: This article is about a novel set during the Iran-Iraq War. Long before writing this article, I had added this novel to another WP article, "Iran-Iraq War" under the section "Fictional stories about the War." Unfortunately, since the name of the Novel, "My Blog Is Up For Grabs" does not seem like it could be the name of a serious, literary work, it was perceived to be a spam link and rejected. Later, another WP editor re-reviewed that and stated, "Wait, it may actually be a real novel" and reinstated the link. However, the damage had already been done to the reputation of the novel due to its bizarre title. I completely agree that the name of this novel doesn't look like a normal title, especially for a novel from Iran! I am hoping that if there is a separate WP article on this novel, such misunderstandings will not arise. It is a serious novel describing human rights and the plight of children in Iran and deserves attention. That said, I fully understand and appreciate WP's attention to standards of quality and issues of spam and self-promotion.

MrConnieGenius (talk) 15:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

16:13:55, 23 May 2021 review of submission by Sonamsingh143
Sir, i added reference links to the article, but after references you reject that. This is not a good decision at all. I spend hours to write this. Please request you to publish my article. or tell me what i can improve in this as well. Sonamsingh143 16:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not for merely telling about something, Wikipedia is for summarizing what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Please take the advice I gave you earlier. 331dot (talk) 17:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

18:25:16, 23 May 2021 review of draft by Señorito Nilo
Hi there, my draft that was declined was actually a translation of a German Wikipedia article, so obviously it met all the German notability (or as they are called there, relevance) criteria. So now I am trying to work out how these differ from the English ones. Maybe 'notability' is really a notch above 'relevance' and nothing can be done on the level of editing; but I am wondering whether 'notability' by English Wikipedia standards refers to the English-speaking world - i.e. is it an exclusion criterion if the sources are in a language other than English? Thanks a lot for further info! Señorito Nilo (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Señorito Nilo (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Each language version of Wikipedia is its own project, with its own editors, policies, and practices. What is acceptable on one language version is not necessarily acceptable on another.
 * Sources need not be in English- it helps, but it is not required, see this page. In the case of a film director, you need to show with significant coverage in independent reliable sources that this person meets the English Wikipedia definition of a notable creative professional. 331dot (talk) 23:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

22:33:09, 23 May 2021 review of submission by 67.224.128.46
67.224.128.46 (talk) 22:33, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. No sources, no article, no debate. Being copied from Wikizilla (with proper attribution) doesn't make it automatically usable; you still need to provide sources. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 01:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

22:36:03, 23 May 2021 review of draft by Honestman7
i would like to get published on this site i was told that i was on there but don't see myself how do i get help with an article thank you Stanley Durbin.

Honestman7 (talk) 22:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. This is not social media, but an encyclopedia. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person.  Wikipedia is not interested in what someone wants to say about themselves.  While not forbidden, autobiographical articles are strongly discouraged per the autobiography policy.  A Wikipedia article is also not necessarily desirable; there are good reasons to not want one. 331dot (talk) 23:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

22:38:05, 23 May 2021 review of draft by Aqquarela2020
Aqquarela2020 (talk) 22:38, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello Wikipedia Rep - I want to ensure the three references I added to the Aqquarela's bio justifies the band existence so we can be published accordingly. I appreciate your guidance in this process. Thank you.
 * Please see your user talk page for important information about your username and conflict of interest. Your draft is largely unsourced.  A Wikipedia article does not just tell of something's existence.  It should(in this case) summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the band, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable band. Please see Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 23:50, 23 May 2021 (UTC)