Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 May 26

= May 26 =

00:29:05, 26 May 2021 review of draft by RaileyHearts
RaileyHearts (talk) 00:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every biographical claim the draft makes that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to a strong third-party source that corroborates the claim or removed wholesale. This is a hard requirement when writing biographical content about living or recently-departed people on Wikipedia and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 02:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

03:25:13, 26 May 2021 review of submission by 95.70.176.125
95.70.176.125 (talk) 03:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * All of your sources are worthless, with five of them being the same copypasta'd press release, with the remainder being interviews or incredibly short articles that are no use for notability in any circumstance. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 03:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

07:41:40, 26 May 2021 review of submission by InaJac
Is it possible to speed up the release process of the entry about DOVID in any way? Thanks for your help!

InaJac (talk) 07:41, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * As noted on your submission, "This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,987 pending submissions waiting for review." It's actually come down, it was five months last week.  It's not a queue; volunteers pick drafts to review in no particular order, there is no way to "jump the line".   You will need to be patient.  Do you have a particular need for a speedy review? 331dot (talk) 08:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I now see your paid editing declaration; Wikipedia has no deadlines, and to be frank is unconcerned with any deadlines that have been imposed on you. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Request on 08:47:43, 26 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by MdEhsanulHaqueTanvir
Hello Help Desk. I am new in Wikipedia. I have researched and found info about Draft:M. Rezaul Hassan. He is one of the most renowned businessman on IT sector in Bangladesh. Moreover you can find many sources in it. I have submitted 3 times. Before that I was not aware of the fact that I should not create any page if it is on Draft space. However Honourable Administrators removed it and also marked the draft as Spam. I am really disappointed. I made tje article from my own sake. But unfortunately i used some promoting words. But I have removed them also. I am working on the draft. If it is deleted then my working will remain no value. If there is any citation problem I am also searching for it now. I hope help desk will remain kindfull on my work and let me have a time to proper citation and make the article don't like promotion.

MdEhsanulHaqueTanvir (talk) 08:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi . I specialize in writing about Bangladesh-related topics, and after a little research am confident that whatever you may think of Hassan, he is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). Creating new articles is one of the most difficult, time consuming, and frustrating tasks a novice editor can attempt. That is particularly true of articles about living people and extant businesses. There are many easier ways to improve Wikipedia. If you want to help, check out WikiProject Bangladesh and/or the community portal for constructive ways to do so. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for kind direction. As I found others people in the same citeria in Bangladesh is noted in Wikipedia that's why I wrote about him. However, can I improve this article further ? Thank you again. MdEhsanulHaqueTanvir (talk) 04:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


 * If by "in the same citeria", you mean there are biographies of Bangladeshis with similar sourcing, tone, and achievements, then the right thing to do is to delete those other biographies (hundreds of Wikipedia articles are deleted every day), not write another one like them. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. I don't believe sources exist that make it possible to write a better biography of Hassan. The latest draft has been deleted. You could start again from scratch, but that would cause you further disappointment when the next draft is deleted. There are millions of other things you could write about. Repeatedly pursuing a topic against everyone's advice might be viewed as tendentious editing, which could result in the loss of your editing privileges. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Request on 09:50:11, 26 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Kashmir987
Dear Editor, Kashmir News Bureau is Multimedia news agency and prominent in India with more the 5 million Followers and readers. Kindly review the decision.

Kashmir987 (talk) 09:50, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * folllowers don't help getting a Wikipedia article, indeependent reliable sources do. The current draft contains at most one, and is promotional in nature, at least in its About Kashmir News Bureau section. Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Request on 13:35:48, 26 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Kallu Kumhar
Kallu Kumhar (talk) 13:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

15:35:14, 26 May 2021 review of submission by 2402:3A80:B1C:2786:C83C:5978:B7CF:349E
2402:3A80:B1C:2786:C83C:5978:B7CF:349E (talk) 15:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft has been rejected, which means it will not considered further. Wikipedia is not a social network; you can use Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc. to tell the world about yourself. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

15:58:40, 26 May 2021 review of submission by Ethiohistoryenthusiast
My draft was rejected for not having reliable sources but I am not sure why my resources were rejected as unreliable. Why are my sources unreliable? They are not only published books but are available to be viewed online.

Ethiohistoryenthusiast (talk) 15:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi . It isn't obvious why the reviewer felt the submission wasn't adequately supported by reliable sources. Perhaps they didn't realize that one of the sources spells it Kourata instead of Korata. Possibly they were just having a bad day. I've undone their review as unsound and have returned the draft to the reviewing pool. You are welcome to continue improving it while you wait, or see Community portal for millions of other ways to help. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * and accepted.Theroadislong (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

16:10:17, 26 May 2021 review of submission by 2402:3A80:183C:6AF:0:1:E39C:3101
2402:3A80:183C:6AF:0:1:E39C:3101 (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. No sources, no article, no debate. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 22:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

16:39:09, 26 May 2021 review of submission by Prizwan5
Prizwan5 (talk) 16:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi . Studying his LinkedIn and Publons profiles, and Google Scholar, I agree with the draft's reviewers that Patan is not notable at this time. The draft has been rejected, meaning that volunteers do not intend to review it again in the foreseeable future. Wikipedia is mainly interested in what other people have written about him, rather than what he has written. As his career progresses, more may be written about him in independent reliable sources. Reexamine the topic after he becomes a full professor. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)