Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 November 23

= November 23 =

04:02:20, 23 November 2021 review of submission by Imcdc
Want to see if anyone has had the time to look at this yet? I've seen a lot of other article submitted on this date have been reviewed but not this one yet. Imcdc (talk) 04:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

06:51:12, 23 November 2021 review of submission by Niteshshah24
I have already submitted the real source of data in the Nepalese online news and sites about Laxminiya Youth club. I have submitted each and every proof about the realiabity of the club. Please help me to add this article. As, i am new to wikipedia, I donot know the whole functioning and coding but I have written the fact article. I am trying to submit the article many times but it was rejected. Please help me in publishing article as many reliable sources have been already submitted as references. Niteshshah24 (talk) 06:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

07:14:02, 23 November 2021 review of submission by 182.50.65.196
This has many sources to be published in wikipedia. Why this article is not published yet? This is 100% realiable & very active youth club in Morang district Nepal. There are many referencer given here for the sources of data which are retrieved from different sites and many news agencies of Nepal. So I request yo published the article as it has true sources of data. 182.50.65.196 (talk) 07:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

07:14:46, 23 November 2021 review of submission by Abm1994
I think this article requires a re-review .I thin the incites and all the attached things to be reviewed again. Abm1994 (talk) 07:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * As the draft was rejected, it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

09:13:43, 23 November 2021 review of submission by 2401:4900:58B4:6901:F8D4:F829:F271:D471
Now the Article contains citations for mostly lines and improved from last time

2401:4900:58B4:6901:F8D4:F829:F271:D471 (talk) 09:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

09:38:49, 23 November 2021 review of submission by 79.127.35.118
The rejected article has been edited and new citations and more details have been added. There has been no response on the talk pages of any of the editors who had rejected the article 3 months ago. What could be done to help the article further? 79.127.35.118 (talk) 09:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Nothing can be done, as the draft was rejected. It's not going to be considered at this time. 331dot (talk) 09:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

09:47:22, 23 November 2021 review of submission by Rasmus1234551
Rasmus1234551 (talk) 09:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, the page has been updated now.

Pleae review it again.
 * The draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. It is almost completely unsourced.  Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please see the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 10:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

14:03:18, 23 November 2021 review of submission by KP070707
Hi team,

I wanted to contribute an update to this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Wallace

I drafted the added content with the sources in the link.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QXEJRV_YPT7oKgeAhCFMRb9qfYDf86IH/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106614507318515073355&rtpof=true&sd=true

Would you be able to have a look and let me know if all those information meets Wikipedia's requirements?

If there is any information you think should be edited, you can give a comment into the doc.

Appreciate your help!

Thank you very much!

KP070707 (talk) 14:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @KP070707 You should discuss this at Talk:Mark Wallace
 * This help desk os for articles not yet created Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 15:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Request on 15:02:16, 23 November 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by IntlLaw
I am new to submitting on Wikipedia. Can you please review this entry? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Asoka_De_Zoysa_Gunawardana

For a simple article like this, I am trying to understand how you strike the balance between a) citing sources and b) not infringing copyright.

I have taken a second pass at re-drafting the content after the initial rejection.

Thank you for your guidance!

IntlLaw (talk) 15:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @IntlLaw I suggest you read Help:Your first article coupled with Help:Referencing for beginners
 * You must use your own words. You may quote small items from cited sources Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 15:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @IntlLaw Reply on June 29, 2024
 * @Timtrent Thank you for the suggestion. I have read the getting started guide and have made edits. Is it possible for you to take a look and give feedback? Thank you so much!

15:52:35, 23 November 2021 review of submission by Djgsyr
Hi everyone.

I am looking for someone to review a page I wrote for a topic that isn't in the wiki database yet. This topic is being researched by scientists and it is helpful to have some general information on it from creditable sources.

Thank you Djgsyr (talk) 15:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Djgsyr you have submitted it for review, and that will happen Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 20:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

16:30:47, 23 November 2021 review of draft by HeidiR123
HeidiR123 (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I am sending you this message because I have a problem with the "Infobox person". Indeed, I would like to put the residence of Sreedhar N. but the platform cannot identify the code "residence". Can you please help me?
 * Don't. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 17:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Meanwhile, your sources are all worthless (a Bloomberg profile and Facebook, neither of which we can use) and the article as a whole is not compliant with WP:Biographies of living persons. Dicking with the infobox in an effort to add more unsourced garbage is a waste of time. Fix your sourcing first. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 17:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

18:34:08, 23 November 2021 review of submission by Campusfilla
This person is very notable in ghana for his web design and app developer skills and he is also a blogger so please review and accept this article Campusfilla (talk) 18:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Campusfilla we do not have different standards for different parts of the world. This draft has bee rejected, and will not proceed further. You could consider a new draft, but you will need references, good ones.
 * For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make a draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 20:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

18:41:47, 23 November 2021 review of submission by Iamflexab
i have corrected the past mistakes on my article Iamflexab (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

23:33:54, 23 November 2021 review of submission by Suleiman.bako1982
Suleiman.bako1982 (talk) 23:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)