Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 October 24

= October 24 =

01:22:42, 24 October 2021 review of draft by 2600:1702:18E0:6020:7133:23:F413:B05B
2600:1702:18E0:6020:7133:23:F413:B05B (talk) 01:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

why my article been held on and have speedy deletion ?
 * No sources, no article, no debate. We also do not engage in speculation. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 02:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

04:44:45, 24 October 2021 review of submission by Thefarcry
Hey there, my current article was declined for creation due to apparently having copyrighted material from my listed skjolddesign.com source, and I'm a little confused as to what exactly is copyrighted, considering the following: 1) The skjolddesign.com source talks about the subject in a non neutral point of view, where as my draft has kept neutrality in speaking to his merits to musical notability. 2) Everything that's been spoken about in that source has been verified from numerous other sources that are independent of both the subject, and of the skjolddesign.com source.

Thank you for any and all assistance in the matter! Thefarcry (talk) 04:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Copyright violation has nothing to do with the neutrality of the source, or how it contributes to notability, . I am supposing that you have copied and pasted information from that source, which seems to be having a copyright license incompatible with Wikipedia's license. For legal reasons, we cannot accept material of this sort. The page was deleted for this reason, at least in part.  Java Hurricane  05:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Hey there, I triple checked the information I used from the provided source, and I made sure to state what I used from that source in the most simplistic manner possible to avoid issues of using an inappropriate tone, with of course the citation to go along with it. The editor who declined my submission already suggested for me to reach out to the administrator who deleted the article to get it reinstated for resubmission, which I'm currently in the process of doing now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefarcry (talk • contribs) 05:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @Thefarcry Be aware that copyrights are very important. Wikipedia has no idea who you are and will protect copyrights fiercely. You may find Donating copyrighted materials helpful. Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 14:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Hey there ! Absolutely, fortunately my draft was restored after the original editor who viewed my first submission of the AoC draft submission + administrator who initiated the deletion both came to the conclusion that my article did in fact not have any violations of copyright infringement. Moving forward with further edits on the draft, I'll be making sure that every precaution is taken to continue to avoid potential copyright infringement. Thefarcry (talk) 15:16, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Request on 07:46:40, 24 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by MJSandow
You declined my submission on Rules Based Motion, and your comments are both correct, pertinent, but unfortunately unresolvable. If a concept is regards as new by the US patent office, can that be regarded as more than a simple neologism.

This is a new concept to reconcile the impossibility to explain how the wrist works when all the parts vary but the net output is consistent. The concept under pinned patents filed in 2000, as well as my PhD. It is clearly described as a neologism, and more /all of the background work is from our group. The wrist has been an impossible structure to resolve (and fix until now) due to is wide variation within the linkages and scatter-gram findings of empirical observations. This new concept has led to a surgical approach that is becoming a standard repair, but the Rule Based Motion notion is beyond most colleagues comprehension. Given your comment, I do not think this is resolvable and one of the challenges I have accepted of pushing out new concepts to question old incumbent and unworkable ideas. My thought was that Wikipedia could provide some notion that it was worth considering as way to reconcile the empirical vs conceptual explanations for such systems - and thus allow input form others in other fields. Maybe it could be aired, but with lots of disclaimers. You are right it is pulled off my thesis and other articles, but they contained the considered and required text, with some additional material. Thanks for the quick response, but unless it can be considered largely as it is, not worth resubmitting. Worth a try for me, but will not be able to address your concerns - as they were quite correct. MJSMJSandow (talk) 02:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

MJSandow (talk) 07:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, Wikipedia is not the place to tell the world about something that you created. Perhaps in time, independent editors will take note of your discoveries in independent reliable sources and write about them- which is the typical way an article is created. 331dot (talk) 07:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank for the feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MJSandow (talk • contribs) 08:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

12:21:40, 24 October 2021 review of draft by Anvar Mirhodiyev
Anvar Mirhodiyev (talk) 12:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

12:52:21, 24 October 2021 review of draft by Lake Van monster
Hello, can you help me with the sources of the series articles that I create regularly?

Lake Van monster (talk) 12:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

14:09:23, 24 October 2021 review of draft by Anhoiemnemoinguoi
Anhoiemnemoinguoi (talk) 14:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

}} Please help me edit the source and help me make my first article a success by sharing some experiences on wikipedia so that I can improve in future articles.

19:35:25, 24 October 2021 review of draft by Motaz.alsakran
Motaz.alsakran (talk) 19:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @Motaz.alsakran Please do not submit items in Arabic to the English Language Wikipedia.
 * من فضلك لا ترسل المواد باللغة العربية إلى ويكيبيديا اللغة الإنجليزية. Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 19:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ok im sorry Motaz.alsakran (talk) 20:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)