Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 October 31

= October 31 =

06:53:19, 31 October 2021 review of submission by Parantak.yadav
Parantak.yadav (talk) 06:53, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. As you were told by the reviewer, you should add to the article about the entire university, as it appears this portion of it does not merit a standalone Wikipedia article. 331dot (talk) 07:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

08:49:26, 31 October 2021 review of submission by IWrite007
My article written about a living person named Anna Chybisova has been declined. What can I do? IWrite007 (talk) 08:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @IWrite007 Your sole contribution to date has been this post
 * Draft:Anna‌ ‌Chybisova‌ ‌ exists but you have not edited it, it has not been declined and it has not been submitted for review. Thus I am confused. Please help my confusion Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 09:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * according to the user talkpage, he had a G7'ed draft at Draft:Anna Chybisova (don't ask me where the difference in the titles is) that was declined for being an advetisement and not establishing notability as well as already G11'ed once. Victor Schmidt (talk) 11:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @Victor Schmidt How impenetrable. It will all come out in the wash Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 13:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * There were invisible characters on either side of the space in the title. The draft has been moved to remedy that. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

12:18:11, 31 October 2021 review of submission by Numiri
My article was rejected for being "not adequately supported by reliable sources." The sources I cited were from the top experts in the field, so how can they not be "reliable"?

Numiri (talk) 12:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I believe that it is the "adequately" more so than the "reliable" that is at issue. You only have two sources, most reviewers look for at least three. 331dot (talk) 13:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

18:03:28, 31 October 2021 review of submission by Hartoo
Since all I wanted to do was add Mr. Bates to the "notable members of the Kiowa Tribe" I found myself forced to create a Wikipedia page from scratch -- because of your infinite red-tape..

I am now informed that Mr. Bates was not notable and that all citations are un reliable.

Setting aside for moment the fundamental racism of deciding to place a Native American author of regional and national note, as "not notable" and thus consigning his life to the cyber-ether,

Hartoo (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Redacted screed. Will look at sources. Would offer link to my review comments page, but I expect it will go unread as the user evidently has their mind made up. Nevertheless, I will deep-dive the sources. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 01:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * We do not cite IMDb as a source as it is a wiki with questionable editorial oversight.
 * https://www.emmys.com/shows/star-trek does not help for notability a whit as he isn't named for any of the awards. If a specific show/movie gets an award and a person is not specifically named, then it is assumed the award is to the show in general and not any of its personnel.
 * We do not cite Fandom/Wikia as a source because it is an open wiki with no editorial oversight.
 * I am inclined to say the other two sources are fine, having read them, but since you have five sources and half of them are dodgy, that weighs in favour of a decline. One or two more in-depth sources with editorial oversight and no direct connexion to the subject or their surrogates should be enough to meet WP:Notability. Your draft was not declined out of racism, it was declined because most of the sources you cite are not very good at all. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 01:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I am inclined to say the other two sources are fine, having read them, but since you have five sources and half of them are dodgy, that weighs in favour of a decline. One or two more in-depth sources with editorial oversight and no direct connexion to the subject or their surrogates should be enough to meet WP:Notability. Your draft was not declined out of racism, it was declined because most of the sources you cite are not very good at all. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 01:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

21:07:14, 31 October 2021 review of submission by Chantern15
Hi, I'd like to request assistance in making this draft suitable for resubmission. Thank you.

Chantern15 (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * if it is notable enough, of course. Chantern15 (talk) 21:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)chantern15
 * I'd like to withdraw my request for help, it does not seem that Richard Katzmayr is notable enough. Thank you for your time.Chantern15 (talk) 08:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)chantern15

21:17:00, 31 October 2021 review of submission by 45.49.9.109
Fix the the page of Miss Asia USA. Don’t be lazy and evils. Get to work. 45.49.9.109 (talk) 21:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * In today's lesson, you learn you aren't our boss. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 21:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

21:19:23, 31 October 2021 review of submission by 45.49.9.109
Please help in fixing and expanding Miss Asia USA. Thanks

45.49.9.109 (talk) 21:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

22:36:22, 31 October 2021 review of submission by Stephen Entreprenuer
I have added a citation confirming information. What else do I need for this article to be published? Stephen Entreprenuer (talk) 22:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Your autobiography has one source which is a press release and not reliable or independent, it was rejected. Theroadislong (talk) 22:38, 31 October 2021 (UTC)