Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 October 9

= October 9 =

00:00:42, 9 October 2021 review of submission by Emojiwiki
I want to know why this draft does not match the notability policy, but nobody submitted it on AfD in Chinese Wikipedia. Why? Wiki Emoji &#124; Emojiwiki Talk 00:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Different language editions of Wikipedia are seperate projects with seperate rules and (possibly) different editors. In addition to that, it could be that the article in the chinese Wikipedia is inappropiate there too and simply noone has gotten around to taking it to their equivalent of AFD. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * While the event might be important for zh wiki, it is less so for others. Because of NOTNEWS, this is quite possibly not notable enough, and the news coverage has basically just been two waves of coverage, instead of a lasting one. Gorden 2211 (talk) 08:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

04:27:43, 9 October 2021 review of draft by Saeid Rahman (MKT)
Hello, I am new to Wikipedia. I am trying to make a Wikipedia article about a renowned industrialist in Bangladesh. He is the former Assistant Project Director of the United Nations. Since it's my first work, I am requesting you to suggest to me how should I write.

Saeid Rahman (MKT) (talk) 04:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * User has received help in the IRC channel and has been told in no uncertain terms that none of their sources are usable/acceptable. WP:Notability/WP:Notability (people) has not been satisfied. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 04:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Dear comrade, I am new to Wikipedia. I am an employee of Keya Cosmetics Ltd. I want to create a Wikipedia article on M Miraz Hossain, the Director of the Keya company, former Assistant Project Director of UN. He is also a writer. Kindly help me why the draft is not qualified to be in Wikipedia?

Saeid Rahman (MKT) (talk) 06:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * You have been given this information already. If you have any additional comments, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. 331dot (talk) 07:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Request on 09:11:03, 9 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Козырев-Чубаров
I regard the review of my draft "Causal mechanics" partial and totally unfair. I would agree if my English was criticesed ans asked to be improved. BUt I can't agree that the article is not neutral. It is about scientific project that is controversial indeed but is now a part of the history of science. If somebody find any word or phrase that is not neutral I would be thankful for its delition from the text. The other argument that the Wikipedia article must rely on secondary sources and should not be an original research is very strange. There is not a piece of an original research here. It is an extract from Russian encyclopedical and scientific sources which should help English speaking reader to navigate in the topic. As to the sources used, I used only reliable, mostly academic sources which, as I know, are of higher level of reliability in Wikipedia. If references are not enough I can put a reference after each phrase. --Козырев-Чубаров (talk) 09:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Козырев-Чубаров (talk) 09:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)


 * "It reads like an essay" is not a neutrality issue, it's a "This is not the platform for this sort of content" issue. Wikipedia is a generalist encyclopaedia and its articles should be written as such. This legitimately reads more like a research essay. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 18:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

11:14:24, 9 October 2021 review of submission by Sadulla Ahmad
Sadulla Ahmad (talk) 11:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. That's what social media is for. Please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 11:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)