Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 September 10

= September 10 =

03:05:49, 10 September 2021 review of draft by Drewolarenshaw
I can't find anywhere to edit my draft title. I need to remove the "'" from 'Collegian's' so that it read 'Collegians'

Drewolarenshaw (talk) 03:05, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Renaming a page is done by moving it to a new name. You may do that yourself, or you can leave it to the reviewer, who will give the page an appropriate name if and when it is accepted for publication. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

03:35:16, 10 September 2021 review of draft by Techsquare21
Hi there, I'm wondering if someone could help me by advising which of my sources were not adequately supported by reliable sources. Was it all of them or just some? Can I reduce the amount of information within the article to have the submission accepted?

Techsquare21 (talk) 03:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

07:48:25, 10 September 2021 review of submission by Official Vky
Official Vky (talk) 07:48, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Draft deleted, user blocked, request moot. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 05:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

08:35:43, 10 September 2021 review of draft by MiBlanche
Hello, my article on the "Daimler and Benz Foundation" has now been rejected twice because apparently not enough reliable sources and supporting documents were provided. It is difficult for me to understand in which sections of my article sources and evidence are missing. I can only imagine that it is the "Research" section. More specific information would be helpful so that I can adjust the article accordingly. I would be grateful for a hint from an experienced Wikipedia editor!

MiBlanche (talk) 08:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles require independent sources, you have mostly used primary ones namely the foundation's own website, we have very little interest in what this says. Theroadislong (talk) 13:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

11:23:14, 10 September 2021 review of submission by FpsJimbo
This article is now ready for submission as Peter has fought the necessary amount of fights to have a wiki entry.

FpsJimbo (talk) 11:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi . Are you referring to Queally's three fights for Bellator? WP:NMMA calls for "at least three professional fights for a top-tier MMA organization". The three fights were in 2019–2021, a period during which Bellator is considered to have been a second-tier organization for men, according to WP:MMATIER. So Queally is no more notable today than when the draft was rejected two years ago. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:37, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

12:25:02, 10 September 2021 review of draft by 193.196.160.33
Hi, I didn't get, what the problem with the draft is exactly after the last Revision two months ago. Please help me, to get the Draft published. What else should I do? Thank you very much in advance.

193.196.160.33 (talk) 12:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

14:13:58, 10 September 2021 review of submission by RonakPRTeam
Can you please help me with this? This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

RonakPRTeam (talk) 14:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note user now blocked. KylieTastic (talk) 14:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note Draft deleted as spam (G11). Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

15:44:26, 10 September 2021 review of draft by Noahpdoty
Hi, I submitted an article for creation about three weeks ago (I think) and I was wondering if there's anything I can do to have it reviewed any faster. It says to go to a relevant WikiProject talk page, but I couldn't see any similar comments/requests so I wasn't sure if I was in the wrong place. Any advise is appreciated, just hoping for a speedy review. It's not a very long article, but I worked on it for a while so I'm itching to see it published. Thanks!

Noahpdoty (talk) 15:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Since you've added tags on the article talk page, there isn't much else you can do. Drafts are reviewed by volunteers doing what they can when they can, in no particular order.  It could be reviewed in five minutes, or five days from now.  Please be patient.  If you are associated with this organization, please review WP:COI and WP:PAID for information on required formal disclosures.
 * I will say I'm not convinced it will be accepted. It just tells about the organization and what it does, which is not what Wikipedia is for, even if it does good work; Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the organization, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization.  The organization website, interviews, announcements of routine activities, brief mentions, and other primary sources do not establish notability. Please see your first article. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)