Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 September 14

= September 14 =

06:11:05, 14 September 2021 review of submission by Drgasajid
I claim my references in my updated article shows notability and independent as ARY News, Daily Pakistan and Dergipark even show notability on Wikipedia itself. Can you please review your decision? Drgasajid (talk) 06:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Before you edit any further you need to correctly disclose your paid editing status. Theroadislong (talk) 06:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

12:24:21, 14 September 2021 review of draft by Ameh Abraham
My recent draft on Babafemi Badejo submitted for review, now titled 'Babafemi Badejo 1', was declined on the basis of appearing like a duplicate of an earlier submission. As a beginner, I had my very first draft deleted. I took out time to do more research especially in securing adequate third party sources. I am sure the editor of the submission which appeared in Yoruba language and I, must have benefitted from some similar sources.

My latest draft is more richer and well sourced. I would appreciate help and support so it is not rejected or deleted again please.

Ameh Abraham (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ by DGG. --Worldbruce (talk) 11:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

13:30:44, 14 September 2021 review of draft by J Chronic Rsa
J Chronic Rsa (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * This would be deleted as contentless if it were an article. You don't write the entire article in the title box. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 13:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Request on 15:40:47, 14 September 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 106.208.144.98
106.208.144.98 (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * We can't host copyright violations, nor is Wikipedia an advertising vehicle. 16:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

16:57:29, 14 September 2021 review of submission by Tom Ellis
Tom Ellis (talk) 16:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Please refer to the top table here:
 * We can't use https://www.thequint.com/entertainment/music/meet-kashmirs-first-female-rapper-menime-hip-hop-queen (no editorial oversight). I can't see a staff listing or any indication they have an editor-in-chief, which is an issue because this outlet accepts news stories written by John Doe Public.
 * https://thewire.in/the-arts/kashmir-rapper-mehak-ashraf-menime is useless for notability (Connexion to subject). Prose interview, and what parts aren't said by her are too sparse to be useful as a source.
 * https://www.aboutpakistan.com/news/kashmirs-first-female-rapper-mehak-ashraf-is-making-waves-with-her-talent/ " " " " (" " "). " ", " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " ".
 * https://pk.mashable.com/entertainment/6244/menime-the-first-kashmiri-female-rapper is borderline, though Mashable as a whole is not particularly ideal.
 * https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/12/29/female-rapper-majority-muslim-region-unlikely-voice-against-oppression/977431001/ is okay, though the latter half of the source is tangential (since it's giving background on the Kashmir situation).
 * Hope this helps. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 17:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

20:04:17, 14 September 2021 review of draft by Xl8ted
I'm not sure why Ruth Martin is not deemed sufficiently notable as a translator. She was co-chair of the UK Translator's Association for three years (a longer term than the usual two), meaning that she was the head of our professional organisation and represented it on the committee of our professional union, the Society of Authors. That makes her pretty important in the world of translation. As far as her own work is concerned, she has translated numerous books, winning one award so far (the Warwick Prize), while another of her translations was on a shortlist of three for the Cundill Prize, the most lucrative non-fiction historical literature prize in the world. In my original article, I included blog links, as they were in-depth interviews. Perhaps this made it look unserious? I've amended the entry to include links referencing Ruth in the Guardian, the Goethe-Institut, and the professional magazines New Books in German and EurolitNet. Translators are seldom the main subject of any article in the mainstream press. It would therefore be difficult to find anything more extensive for any but the very highest-profile members of our profession! Will this be enough to justify resubmission? Thanks!

Xl8ted (talk) 20:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If the Warwick Prize has at least regional recognition, then it'd help for notability if you can prove she won it. (Being shortlisted for a prize doesn't help for notability unless the prize is especially prestigious, i.e. a Nobel or Pulitzer.) The blog interviews certainly don't and didn't help (connexion to subject, no editorial oversight). —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 20:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

20:56:00, 14 September 2021 review of submission by HerpHusbandry
Umm, so my article just got rejected. Something about not having enough references. Any ideas? I don't understand. HerpHusbandry (talk) 20:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Account subsequently blocked for advertising or promotion. --Worldbruce (talk) 11:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

22:50:02, 14 September 2021 review of draft by Elevedevie
I was originally trying to do an explanatory stub instead of a footnote so that other editors would be able to avail themselves of it if necessary, but have now gone with providing the intra-article information via a footnote/reference. Therefore, I wish to withdraw the submissions which I "published" with the draft name American_Crayon_Company since the stub is no longer needed. Thank you.Elevedevie (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Elevedevie (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi . As the sole author of Draft:American Crayon Company, you may request its speedy deletion by adding  to the top of the draft. Or, if you do nothing, the draft will be deleted automatically after it has not been edited by a human in six months. --Worldbruce (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)