Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 September 19

= September 19 =

00:55:20, 19 September 2021 review of draft by Blackdeath39-9979533
Good day, I have created and published a Wikipedia page regarding the Mellin-Ross function because it was a function with very little research on, therefore not enough sources out there discussing it and its properties. Hence I took three days of continuous work deriving various results to share with other enthusiasts and researchers. The reason of declining was because there are not enough sources referenced which is the sole purpose of why I created the page in the first place. I do understand that a list of properties and equalities with no valid reference is not the most trustable thing to publish, therefore I would like to enquire if including how the results were derived in the page will be enough for the issue to be resolved.

Blackdeath39-9979533 (talk) 00:55, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It wouldn't help, if I'm frank. You'd need to demonstrate that this function has seen some academic or other interest, at the very least, as opposed to just demonstrating its existence by making calculations. Compare this to the section on Keeler's/the Futurama theorem on the "The Prisoner of Benda" article at the very least; that section has a fair number of sources demonstrating that there has been some academic interest in it beyond its novelty. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 01:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

12:21:27, 19 September 2021 review of draft by Medicineowl
Please just remove whatever is not encyclopedic to get the entry published for me; it's actually an emergency.

Medicineowl (talk) 12:21, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * , The decline is correct. If you are experiencing an emergency situation contact the appropriate local authorities, we can't help you with that. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Ive contacted emergency personnel; the Information War extends into this space as well. Would an experienced editor mind helping me publish a more basic and encyclopedic entry about this?


 * Please read this information. Wikipedia should not have an "alternative" version of Electronic harassment that goes against what mainstream, reliable sources say and presents the theory as reality.  Note also that several of the sources in the draft don't support the text in the draft.  I am actually a bit surprised that the draft was declined rather than rejected.  Wikipedia simply isn't a medium for disseminating that kind of claim. --bonadea contributions talk 15:19, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

12:31:00, 19 September 2021 review of submission by Kobia2020
am requesting assistant because i have submited my page two time and rejected twice. My company website is oxdes.com its a classified website with presence in over 150 countries Kobia2020 (talk) 12:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Please refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode, and note I am deliberately skipping over any cites to the subject itself.
 * We can't use https://venturesafrica.com/oxdes-com-is-helping-users-build-their-careers/ (404 compliant).
 * https://www.similarweb.com/website/oxdesk.com/ is useless for notability (too sparse). Anything that just provides pageview metrics or business profiles isn't going to be in-depth coverage.
 * We can't use https://nigerianfinder.com/top-free-classifieds-ads-websites-in-kenya/ (404 compliant).
 * " " " https://www.informationng.com/2015/07/1-classifieds-site-in-kenya-oxdesk-com.html (" " " ").
 * I cannot assess canback.com/files/2017_EIU_how_technology_is_driving_retail_in_Africa (Technical barrier). Notice that I've intentionally removed the front parts of the URL; Firefox believes the website is a security risk.
 * I cannot assess https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/ke (Technical barrier). The website seems to be undergoing some sort of maintenance.
 * https://www.similarweb.com/top-websites/ is a non-sequitur.
 * This would be a lot more helpful if your sourcing was actually available. The fact that so many of your sources are either dead or have technical issues is not a good one for the draft, full stop. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 13:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

14:53:21, 19 September 2021 review of submission by Toomuchbroadway
I don't understand why my draft keeps getting rejected. It says the references of the articles are invalid but they are from pretty credible sources and official sites. Could please help in pointing out which specific references are not valid and why? or if all tell me how I can fix this. Thank you Toomuchbroadway (talk) 14:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Please refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:
 * https://www.playbill.com/person/amber-ardolino is useless for notability (too sparse). Basically a resume.
 * https://archive.triblive.com/ccpa/ is a non-sequitur. You need to link to the actual story, not the website's CCPA landing page. As to the actual article, it's borderline; most of what's said about her in the article is from her own mouth.
 * https://www.ellwoodcityledger.com/article/20120920/News/309209946 seems fine.
 * https://www.broadwayworld.com/jacksonville/article/Artist-Series-Presents-WEST-SIDE-STORY-124-9-20121114 is useless for notability (too sparse). Name-drop in a cast list.
 * https://www.broadwayworld.com/article/Full-Cast-Announced-for-2014-15-FLASHDANCE-National-Tour-Kicks-Off-Next-Month-in-Idaho-20140924 " " " " (" "). "-" " " " ".
 * I cannot assess anything from the Wayback Machine at present as it is having technical issues.
 * http://lppacs.org/lp-alumna-joins-hamilton/ is useless for notability (connexion to subject). Her alma mater is not going to be a disinterested third party when it comes to her.
 * http://www.theensemblist.com/blog/2019/7/1/9w6gihyltmbosb6iyeu7gyizpvo47b is useless for notability (too sparse). Name-drop.
 * http://www.theensemblist.com/blog/2018/9/18/kindness-goes-a-long-way is useless for notability (connexion to subject). She wrote it.
 * https://www.broadwayworld.com/article/They-Got-the-Beat-Meet-the-Cast-of-HEAD-OVER-HEELS--Now-in-Previews-20180623 is useless for notability (too sparse). A name-drop in the main article and an aggressively short bio even by the standards of the biographies on that page.
 * https://www.timesonline.com/entertainmentlife/20190129/north-sewickley-native-part-of-morissette-show-on-broadway is useless for notability (too sparse). Name-drop.
 * I cannot assess https://www.playbill.com/personlistpage/person-list (technical barrier). Even with all javascript temporarily allowed and uBlock disabled, the page is blank for me.
 * We can't use https://www.broadwayworld.com/article/BWW-TV-Watch-Bonnie-Milligan-and-Amber-Ardolino-in-Music-Video-for-End-Up-Together-20200421 (too sparse). Extremely short article, most of which is parentheticals listing the works they were in previously.
 * https://deadline.com/2021/07/hamilton-broadway-cast-miguel-cervantes-1234802387/ is useless for notability (too sparse). Name-drop in a cast list.
 * You have one unambiguously usable source, one borderline one, one screwed by tech issues, and the rest are absolutely worthless. Your problem is you focus too much on the outlet; we care just as much about a source's actual content as well. See WP:SIGCOV. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 15:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

18:45:23, 19 September 2021 review of submission by Deepikaaswani
Deepikaaswani (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 18:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)