Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 September 23

= September 23 =

02:56:11, 23 September 2021 review of submission by Srineshreddi
Hello, I have written the correct details.about a programming language that was newly developed, and this article was rejected.multiple times, I am asking advice to help me change the things that are not suppose to be written in Wikipedia.

Thank you. Srineshreddi (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. You do not have a sufficient number of independent reliable sources with significant coverage of this programming language, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. 331dot (talk) 07:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

06:44:26, 23 September 2021 review of submission by Rupan104
Rupan104 (talk) 06:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

09:18:58, 23 September 2021 review of draft by Lazymaverick0210
Lazymaverick0210 (talk) 09:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Please merge the content of Sandeep Shrivastava.

13:08:15, 23 September 2021 review of submission by Breti Duma
Hi there, I have done the previous draft too, and I just want to add some more information. Can you please help me how can I add some other information? best Albert Breti Duma (talk) 13:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

13:14:16, 23 September 2021 review of draft by Manovenkatachalam
This is Mano. I am an independent film maker and the director of this film titled 'Irudhi Pakkam'. Since we are on very low budget we never made any promotional activities yet so that we do not have any newspaper articles or something like that to attach as a reliable source. Kindly guide us.

Manovenkatachalam (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * We wouldn't be after press releases or promotional content in the first place. We'd be looking for reviews from professional film critics. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 13:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

My draft my film's page is rejected citing reliable source is needed. How can I add source for a film which have not been shown for any public viewing yet. And we don't have any newspaper articles since we don't have the budget.

Manovenkatachalam (talk) 13:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia can wait until then. We don't consider press releases to be particularely usefully anyways, as already stated one section above. Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

But there are tons of films which are in pre-production and post-production are being listed in wikipedia right?


 * Only if there are independent publications that covered the pre/post-production in significant detail. Which must also be independent, not based on press releases or other publicity generated by the film company or its associates. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

would an IMDB page be considered as reliable source?
 * No. We don't cite IMDb as it is, like Wikipedia, an open wiki that has no/ineffectual professional editorial oversight. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 14:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

what about results of some film festival's website?
 * Also no, unless the film festival is an especially prestigious one. Film festivals are practically a dime-a-dozen, and the awards most hand out aren't worth a hill of beans. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 14:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Please mention my options now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manovenkatachalam (talk • contribs)
 * You will need to wait until the film meets the criteria, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Not every film merits a Wikipedia article. 331dot (talk) 14:53, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

17:36:27, 23 September 2021 review of submission by 2402:3A80:19B8:FC55:D4EA:1FF7:A052:A72A
This is not promotional or autobiography article. Its all about a developing personality on this young age. I don't know what's is the reliable source wiki expecting to verify. 2402:3A80:19B8:FC55:D4EA:1FF7:A052:A72A (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "Developing personalities" almost never merit articles. When they are developed, and independent reliable sources choose on their own to write about them, we can consider a draft at that time.  For now, this draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

17:40:54, 23 September 2021 review of submission by 2409:4060:20A:779E:1D6B:D15D:9001:5ED7
2409:4060:20A:779E:1D6B:D15D:9001:5ED7 (talk) 17:40, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

20:06:23, 23 September 2021 review of draft by Qwestyun
I guess I am just wondering what else I need to do to get this page approved. I see other bands with much less experience and notoriety that have successfully been added. Any suggestions and tips are greatly welcomed. Thank you for your time. Qwestyun (talk) 20:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It's notability, not notoriety, which has a more negative connotation. Please review the comment left by the reviewer; that's exactly what you need to do.
 * Please see other stuff exists. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible to get inappropriate articles by us. It could be that these other articles are inappropriate, and just unaddressed. If you want to use other articles as a model, make sure they are classified as good articles. 331dot (talk) 20:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I appreciate your feedback.

21:51:38, 23 September 2021 review of submission by 103.194.131.12
103.194.131.12 (talk) 21:51, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Kindly advice to improve.
 * The draft article needs better sourcing to demonstrate notability. See WP:GNG and WP:BLPRS. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:55, 25 September 2021 (UTC)