Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 September 30

= September 30 =

03:46:22, 30 September 2021 review of submission by 216.174.91.149
I'm at my wit's end not knowing what more to write about St. Xenia?

216.174.91.149 (talk) 03:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Request on 08:56:19, 30 September 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Oyindebrah
I stumbled on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abimbola_Fashola. So I decided to create Wikipedia pages for first ladies in Nigeria.

Apparently I am starting with Kebbi state. I am having issues with the page, the person is a first lady of a state, she sits on an international board. had done quite a lot of things on cancer which I have also reported but the message reviewers keep leaving is about her notability.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zainab_Bagudu

Here is the draft above, please help

Oyindebrah (talk) 08:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:NPOL does not grant a presumption of notability to people on NGO boards or to first ladies/husbands. Please refer to the top table here:
 * https://guardian.ng/news/kebbi-govs-wife-sensitizes-physically-challenged-persons-on-virus/ is useless for notability (too sparse). A supermajority of what the article says about her is either direct quotes or indirect attribution of views, no significant coverage.
 * https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/10/bagudu-emerges-first-african-elected-to-cancer-board/ " " " " (" "). " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " ", " " ".
 * https://www.sunnewsonline.com/kebbi-governors-wife/ is borderline. The article is fairly skimpy, but includes some details. (Note to reviewers: The Sun (Nigeria) is unrelated to The Sun (United Kingdom) despite their very similar logos.)
 * https://guardian.ng/news/26-women-die-of-cervical-cancer-disease-everyday-in-nigeria-director-uicc/ is useless for notability (too sparse). A supermajority of what the article says about her is either direct quotes or indirect attribution of views, no significant coverage.
 * https://nairametrics.com/2020/09/22/fg-lists-approved-covid-19-test-centres-for-international-travellers-to-sanction-airlines-over-non-compliance/ is a non-sequitur.
 * https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/242186-interview-why-wrong-medical-diagnosis-occurs-in-nigeria-consultant-paediatrician.html is useless for notability (connexion to subject). Interview with an insignificant lede.
 * https://www.sunnewsonline.com/cancer-vaccine-will-be-available-in-nigeria-2021-dr-bagudu/ is useless for notability (too sparse). A supermajority of what the article says about her is either direct quotes or indirect attribution of views, no significant coverage.
 * https://leadership.ng/cttee-visits-emir-of-gwandu-ahead-of-cancer-screening-of-5000-women-in-kebbi/ is useless for notability (too sparse). Name-drop.
 * https://dailytrust.com/experts-seek-integration-of-family-planning-in-cervical-cancer-screening " " " " (" "). "-".
 * https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p09mfbls is useless for notability (connexion to subject). Interview.
 * Only one of your sources is usable, and even then it's not a particularly good one. The notability threshold has not been met, let alone the biographical sourcing requirements. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 22:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * - re-signing for ping. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 22:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

15:35:14, 30 September 2021 review of submission by Nomadicghumakkad
Any thoughts on notability of this and similar subjects? I don't think I know enough to give a good feedback to creator. This is being discussed at my talk page

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Request on 17:58:45, 30 September 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by LEO FUKS
dear Colleagues I wanted to improve the article "Throat Singing" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Throat_singing, but it is a DISAMBIGUATION PAGE, not a regular article Then, I edited with an explanation about the subject, that was regarded as not suitable by a reviewer I also started creating a page on "Throat Singing Techniques", that has a different meaning than "Throat Singing", but the reviewer did not accept it and suggested that the contribution could be transferred to the existing one. BUT HOW CAN A DISAMBIGUATION PAGE BE CONVERTED INTO A REGULAR WIKIPEDIA PAGE? Thanks a lot Leo Fuks

LEO FUKS (talk) 17:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Your decline. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The article you linked to Throat singing is not a disambiguation page. It's an article which lists the varieties of throat-singing techniques. Rather than make a page which substantially duplicates our current page you could improve the current page. It may be better to begin by making small changes so that you can get the feel for editing on Wikipedia. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

19:11:12, 30 September 2021 review of draft by DamesnetV
Why is this being declined when it contains more references than some articles that have been published? DamesnetV (talk) 19:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every claim about a living or recently-departed person that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to a strong, in-depth, third-party source that corroborates it or (if no such sources can be found) removed. This is a HARD REQUIREMENT when writing about such topics on Wikipedia and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 21:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)