Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 August 10

= August 10 =

00:03:26, 10 August 2022 review of submission by Rudyon
My submission was declined for lack of notability. I think the refrences in the page are enough to show that this subject is notable. I believe that this complies with the notability guidelines. I do not why it was considered not notable by the reviewer. Rudyon (talk) 00:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * @Rudyon: sorry, but a CoHo record and three pieces of churnalism do not establish notability. Nor is there anything particularly encyclopaedic in the draft; it simply states that the company exists and provides some services. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Rudyon And I believe that Wikipedia doesn't care about funding rounds -- those don't tell much about a company. 71.228.112.175 (talk) 05:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

07:05:40, 10 August 2022 review of submission by Barrysbest

 * Courtesy link User:Barrysbest/Randburg Football Club Theroadislong (talk) 07:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You have misunderstood how Wikipedia works. Notability is judged by looking at the depth of coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources, we have no interest in what you want to say about the club I'm afraid. Your draft has nothing to indicate that the club would pass the notability criteria. Theroadislong (talk) 09:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

08:45:38, 10 August 2022 review of submission by Zohaib Alee
I have provided all references related to the show. They are all independent sources but my article is not getting published. Guide me how my article can get approved. Zohaib Alee (talk) 08:45, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * @Zohaib Alee: we already dealt with this earlier — the draft has been rejected. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

08:54:42, 10 August 2022 review of draft by Writershelper
Could you please make changes to the name of the article? It should be Yuriy Serebriansky instead of I did. I could find where to do changes to the name. Many thanks in advance! Writershelper (talk) 08:54, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Writeshelper Writershelper (talk) 08:54, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The title of the draft is not relevant to the review process; if accepted, it will be placed by the reviewer at the correct title in the main encyclopedia- please leave a note on the draft talk page. 331dot (talk) 09:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for promt reply! Writershelper (talk) 03:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Request on 09:50:16, 10 August 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Panoramics
My draft for a new article has been declined. However, I am not sure what I need to change in order to make it fit for publication. Cou you tell me some concrete things that I can change? (for instance: remove a particular source, or change a particular sentence)

Panoramics (talk) 09:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * @Panoramics: you may want to review WP:FRINGE, for starters. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * According to that page, wikipedia articles about fringe theories should be neutral, without original research, and verifiable. I am not sure which one is the problem for my article. Could you tell me which of those requirements fails for the draft?
 * In other words:
 * Does the draft look neutral? Does the draft look like original research? Does the draft look verifiable? Panoramics (talk) 10:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Panoramics: there are many unreferenced statements, which immediately raises a possible OR red flag. And some of the sources cited are distinctly non-RS. Given all that, I think there is enough reason to put the onus on you to show that all the information is reliable, rather than on the reviewer to show that it isn't. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback. I have rewritten the article. What do you think of the stackexchange source? Panoramics (talk) 18:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

09:59:49, 10 August 2022 review of submission by Wahab98
what are the issues in this draft?

Wahab98 (talk) 09:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

10:00:39, 10 August 2022 review of submission by Wahab98
what are the issues with this draft?

Wahab98 (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected. See WP:TOOSOON. Better to wait until the film is released and see if it gets any reviews in the mainstream press. Also, read WP:YFA. TechnoTalk (talk) 06:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * this title has received reviews from mainstream media and cited those links as well Wahab98 (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Unreleased films generally do not merit articles, unless there is something very unusual about the production of the film itself(see Rust (suspended film) for an example of this) that is widely reported in independent reliable sources(not just casting announcements or announcements about steps in the production process like the commencement of principal photography). Once the film is released, you can request that the draft be reconsidered. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

12:32:54, 10 August 2022 review of submission by Selim31081993
Selim31081993 (talk) 12:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC) Hi there,

I'm just wondering what else I can do to get a Wikipedia page about myself published? I have made a start, and if you can take a look at my profile, suggest anything I can do further to increase my chance of being published. I do have quite extensive experience on my belt including involvement in the community, and would like to know what else I can do to get a page published for myself?

Regards,

Selim C.


 * Hi to put it bluntly, you shouldn't, and (judging by the content of your draft, so far) almost certainly cannot, "have a page about [yourself] published". Wikipedia is a global encyclopaedia, not a social media platform or similar, and you do not create a 'profile' just because you would like one. Once multiple independent and reliable secondary sources have published significant coverage of you, an article can then be created summarising those sources, but even then this shouldn't be done by you. Sorry, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

15:53:59, 10 August 2022 review of submission by RealHamzaPlayz
The person I am writing about is a really close friend and I think he's famous enough to have his own wikipedia page. There are no official websites with his information so I am creating this page so that people know more about him and have no confusion. RealHamzaPlayz (talk) 15:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @RealHamzaPlayz, your perception of fame has no bearing on whether someone meets our criteria for inclusion, we define as notability. If no one not connected to the subject has taken the time to publish in depth coverage on the subject in reliable sources then you are wasting your time trying to create one for him. Your time is probably spent elsewhere promoting him through social media you will only find frustration here trying to push it. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The YouTube link doesn't even work. 71.228.112.175 (talk) 06:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

16:31:16, 10 August 2022 review of draft by Tommypaul76
I have created the draft few days back I need speedy publication of the article as the article about the politician from Jammu & Kashmir.

Tommypaul76 (talk) 16:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no deadline here, your draft will be reviewed in due course. Theroadislong (talk) 16:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

16:40:10, 10 August 2022 review of submission by Tigin taagane
Tigin taagane 16:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * What is your question @Tigin taagane? The draft has been rejected and will no longer be considered. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

20:44:02, 10 August 2022 review of submission by David the researcher
David the researcher (talk) 20:44, 10 August 2022 (UTC) hey i was just wondering that i was trying to submit Draft:IShowSpeed for articles of creations to move it it mainstream but it won't let me submit my article and it left me with an error occured message so how can i fix this? thank you and have a good day.


 * well never mind i already fixed the issues but thank you anyways. David the researcher (talk) 21:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You didn't add any new citations after the last decline on July 24. The draft will be rejected if it keeps getting resubmitted without improvements. The entire article appears to be an attempt to publicly shame a YouTuber who is a serial sexual harasser. While that is egregious behavior, the sourcing doesn't meet the notability threshold for a Wikipedia article. TechnoTalk (talk) 06:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Request on 21:08:19, 10 August 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by GuptaHarshita
Hi, I have added citiation in my draft but again it is not accepted. Can you please help me to add reliable sources in this.

GuptaHarshita (talk) 21:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @GuptaHarshita, I have helped you be removing the improperly source biography section. That section needs to written in a neutral manner based off of what we classify as reliable sources have written about the subject. I have also removed the CV style table that had no place in the article. You are now only left with 1 primary source that is not enough to establish notability. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 21:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your information! Now if I add content like what I added in the Ravi Mehrotra section, then it will not get declined. Am I right? GuptaHarshita (talk) 07:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)