Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 August 6

= August 6 =

00:28:43, 6 August 2022 review of submission by 2600:1700:F120:D150:2D6E:A443:20EB:303F
I was just hoping to get more clarification on why exactly my article on Robert Avalon was declined. 2600:1700:F120:D150:2D6E:A443:20EB:303F (talk) 00:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Request on 05:27:23, 6 August 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Kayzed4343
Kayzed4343 (talk) 05:27, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * @Kayzed4343 Please see the comment that was placed in the draft. 71.228.112.175 (talk) 09:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

08:00:43, 6 August 2022 review of submission by Википисатель
Википисатель (talk) 08:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

My question is that I wanted to create my first article many times Draft:Rakhmatilla Akhmadjonov, but it was rejected due to some errors. I want you to be able to create or accept an article in the AfC, or correct my mistakes in the article. I was registered in the Uzbek Wikipedia, but despite this, I want to create my first article in the English Wikipedia. If you accepted my article or your friends accepted it, I would be very, very happy with you. This gives me strength to contribute to the article, motivation and improvement of the article. Thank you very much! Википисатель (talk) 08:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * @Википисатель You also made this request yesterday. 71.228.112.175 (talk) 09:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @71.228.112.175 Well yes, but I didn't get an answer. Википисатель (talk) 11:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * We do not accept biographies containing large numbers of unsourced claims. LinkedIn and Sputnik are unacceptable sources. —Jéské Couriano  v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 17:18, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Experienced editor DoubleGrazing did answer you yesterday... the question and answer are a few sections above.  In any case, experienced editor Jéské Couriano has answered here. 71.228.112.175 (talk) 08:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Википисатель ping 71.228.112.175 (talk) 08:12, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Request on 10:08:10, 6 August 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Rayanfds
hi the above article was not accepted because of "WP:FILM-Lacks critical reception and no reviews from national critics". Actually it is a regional film spoken by only small community of people living in Mangalore-India .These films usually won't make it to national news.So how do i make it get approved?.I added almost all the detailed and citation availabe. Thank you.

Rayanfds (talk) 10:08, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @Rayanfds unfortunately, if sufficient sources do not exist to support the film meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines there is nothing you can do to get the article approved. S0091 (talk) 16:33, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * hi @S0091 I have added mainstream regional language daily/periodical citations like NewsKarnataka, Daijiworld, Deccan herald,Canara news. Rayanfds (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Please re-submit the article for review. --Dwaipayan (talk) 14:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

11:29:36, 6 August 2022 review of submission by Shadysbook
I am trying to add Oasis Fertility on wikipedia and the platform is not accepting. Its one of the notable hospitals in India and there are many others similar to this that are live. I have submitted at least half dozen of times but its not getting approved.

It really taking lot of stress and pain to convince the wiki team to make this listing live.

Please help us in taking the company live. The company does CSR activities and has one of top3 hospitals in fertility space.

Shadysbook (talk) 11:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Your draft Draft:Oasis Fertility was rejected, it is just advertising and not notable. Theroadislong (talk) 12:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

16:18:42, 6 August 2022 review of draft by Rafe1985
I inserted the references with sources but it still says no sources. The information in the content is all my own with information garnered in my academic years.

Rafe1985 (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * @Rafe1985: it doesn't say "no sources", it says "not adequately supported by reliable sources"; meaning, there are some sources listed, but they're either not enough, or aren't being used in a way that adequately supports the contents. Please see WP:REFB for advice on referencing, including how to create inline citations.
 * Also, you say "the content is all my own with information garnered in my academic years". This is somewhat problematic, as in order to establish the notability of the subject (per WP:GNG), we need to see what other, independent and reliable published sources have said about it, not (just) what you think about it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Rafe1985 Please see No Original Research (click here). 71.228.112.175 (talk) 08:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for the info. I will then summarize what has been published online and in newspapers about the group. Posting the information without hyperlinks is acceptable. Yes or No. In other words, just providing the MLA sanctioned bibliography will suffice? Rafe1985 (talk) 13:59, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Rafe1985 "Posting the information without hyperlinks is acceptable. Yes or No."  No.  Statements made in an article need references.  There is a link above to WP:REFB... Did you understand what is explained at that link? 71.228.112.175 (talk) 08:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * yup Rafe1985 (talk) 13:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)