Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 December 26

= December 26 =

07:14:52, 26 December 2022 review of submission by Amal Jaffer
Amal Jaffer (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @amal jaffer: your draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. lettherebedarklight晚安 07:19, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Amal Jaffer: you don't ask a question, but your draft (such as it is) has been rejected and won't be considered further.
 * Wikipedia is a global encyclopaedia, not a social media or blogging platform for you to tell the world about yourself. Autobiographies are very strongly advised against, see WP:AUTOBIO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

08:56:59, 26 December 2022 review of submission by Amal Jaffer
Amal Jaffer (talk) 08:56, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. Please read the autobiography policy.  If you meet our special defintion of a notable person, and independent reliable sources choose to give you significant coverage, someone will eventually write an article about you, but it will not be yours to control.  There are also good reasons to not want an article. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Request on 11:45:51, 26 December 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Anujguptahmsc
Can anyone please help us why our draft is getting rejected?

Please advise us to make our CEO's profile active on Wikipedia.

We are trying to make our CEO's profile active on Wikipedia for so long but somehow it keeps getting rejected. Kindly guide us through the correct process.

Anujguptahmsc (talk) 11:45, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * There are many errors here. First, if you are not Anuj Gupta, you cannot use his name as your username. Please change your username at Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS. Second, accounts are for individuals, not groups. Only a single person should have access to your account. Third. Wikipedia does not have "profiles", not a single one. Wikipedia has articles, typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the subject in any way.
 * Next, you have a conflict of interest and must also declare as a paid editor; a Terms of Use requirement. Lastly, Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about someone. An article about a person must primarily summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the person, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. Because your draft does not do that, it was rejected and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 11:53, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

13:43:18, 26 December 2022 review of submission by Qkkhan442
Qkkhan442 (talk) 13:43, 26 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @Qkkhan442: you haven't asked a question, but just to explain, your draft was rejected, meaning it won't be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:54, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

16:51:07, 26 December 2022 review of submission by Perumalism
Promotional Content has been removed added few reference Perumalism (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @Perumalism: this has been rejected, deleted, salted, the whole shooting match — time to drop it and find something else to write about. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @DoubleGrazing: this AoD says he just basic low level party worker. But Now he is the current president of TamilNadu Unit of ruling party of India and definitely meets general notability guideline, is there is any way to submit this article. Perumalism (talk) 17:19, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Perumalism: in the first instance, you'll have to take your case to the reviewer who rejected this. Note that being the "president of TamilNadu Unit of ruling party of India" is not a notability criterion, and doesn't in and of itself have anything to do with GNG, though. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok Perumalism (talk) 08:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

19:18:47, 26 December 2022 review of submission by GameOfAwesome
I believe that this play is well known enough that it should be included. All of the current information from search is all biased and needs the enclyodpedic tone that wikipedia gives. Is their anything I can expand upon or change to make the article more notable

GameOfAwesome (talk) 19:18, 26 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @GameOfAwesome I suggest reaching out to the editor who rejected the draft. Its not clear what you mean by "All of the current information from search is all biased".  Wikipedia simply summarizes what reliable sources state, which includes good and bad reviews.  S0091 (talk) 21:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * What i meant is that it needs a wikipedia article to give an unbiased description of the play GameOfAwesome (talk) 21:19, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles are not published based on the perceived  'need'  for an article, but based on notability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

21:36:15, 26 December 2022 review of draft by Alifa22
21:36:15, 26 December 2022 review of submission by Alifa22

Can you please delete my draft article Barbaros Hayreddin: Sultan's Edict.

Alifa22 (talk) 21:36, 26 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @Alifa22: you can either blank the draft (delete all its content), or place the   tag on it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 00:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)