Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 February 16

= February 16 =

04:41:42, 16 February 2022 review of draft by Littlestepsforward
Please can you review the draft. I have updated the content with the new sources.

Littlestepsforward (talk) 04:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You have resubmitted it for review; as noted on your draft, "This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,232 pending submissions waiting for review." Reviews are conducted by volunteers doing what they can, when they can, in no particular order. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

10:12:40, 16 February 2022 review of submission by Aphis Marta
Hi everyone,

I submitted the above draft back in December because of my CoI. The draft has already been reviewed positively (yay!) but according to the reviewer it appears that there is a redirect in the way that prevents a simple move. I did a bit of digging around and according to WP:RFD a page can not be moved over a redirect if the latter has a history of its own (the target page has been renamed several times, and the redirect edited accordingly).

My question therefore is whether Requested_moves/Technical_requests would be the right place to ask for this redirect to be deleted (there is a specific "Administrator needed" sub-section), or if it should be done here?

Thanks!

Aphis Marta (talk) 10:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You are right, that would be the correct place to request that. In your request, note that the reviewer would have accepted your draft. 331dot (talk) 10:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

12:29:30, 16 February 2022 review of submission by Director Haseeb Azam
Director Haseeb Azam (talk) 12:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Haseeb Azam is a Video Director of Pakistan Born : 6 August 2003 Height : 5,2 Father : Muhammad Azam Best Friend : Suhaib Ali
 * Rejection means the draft cannot be reconsidered. As I said on your draft, Wikipedia is not social media where people can tell the world about themselves.  This is an encyclopedia that summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the topic, showing how the topic meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. 331dot (talk) 12:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

15:30:44, 16 February 2022 review of submission by Fighterpoint32
I want to redirect a television show name Rang Jaun Tere Rang Mein. It is now on draftspace. I want to redirect now but I don't have a move option to move this page.

Fighterpoint32 (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Courtesy link: Draft:Rang Jaun Tere Rang Mein Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

17:43:34, 16 February 2022 review of submission by D3FAULTX8
D3FAULTX8 (talk) 17:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

The draft was updated and submitted. Still not reviewed yet.
 * It takes time to be reviewed but it will be declined. The sourcing isn't about Gangadhar but instead is mostly about Angel Broking. Press releases don't count towards notability, and all the others all seem to be based on the same single event of him becoming CEO. You're better off simply doing a redirect to Angel One (company) until more sources about him can be uncovered. See WP:GNG. TechnoTalk (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

18:30:10, 16 February 2022 review of submission by Jon Deen
18:36:44, 16 February 2022 review of submission by Jon Deen Draft:Your submission name here -->Nikka Gershman-Pepper

Hello - my article was declined due to lack of notable links. In fact it has reliable outside sources such as NPR From The Top and The Columbian. Can you please help? Thank you. Jon Deen (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * There isn't enough coverage of her to demonstrate notability. Please see WP:NMUSICIAN. She's apparently still studying in music school - please see WP:TOOSOON.  Also, please see WP:COI if you have a connection with the subject. TechnoTalk (talk) 19:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

19:26:18, 16 February 2022 review of submission by Woas Moji
Barbod Masoumi (Bitbod0 (talk) 19:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. We don't accept cirricula vitae, and interviews are useless for notability (connexion to subject). —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 20:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

21:35:39, 16 February 2022 review of submission by JaneGaskell
I have followed the template and type of references from another historian on Wiki and I can't understand why my page has not been accepted?

JaneGaskell (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Beware in using other articles as a model unless they are classified as good articles. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to get by us. We can only address what we know about.  It could be that this other article you saw is also inappropriate. See other stuff exists.
 * The sources you have offered are not signficant coverage of Dr. Hulme in independent reliable sources; they seem to be a few profiles from places she is associated with(not independent) and other brief mentions, both of which do not establish that she meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable academic. 331dot (talk) 21:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)