Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 July 30

= July 30 =

08:42:45, 30 July 2022 review of submission by Helloricko
My feedback on the article submission was: "This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject." I accept and understand those comments and am happy to work to improve the draft to a more encyclopedic format. However I wanted to check your opinion on the extent of the issue... If you think it is impossible to write an article about an existing political campaign from a completely neutral point of view, then I won't spend time trying. Perhaps it's not the sort of thing wiki is suitable for (I struggled to find examples of other campaigns with wiki pages in my research for how to format the article). However if you think it is possible, but that I need to fine tune the wording and source material, then I will spend more time perfecting it in light of the comments. Thank you for your help. Helloricko (talk) 08:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The sourcing is odd. It seems to be a lot of kindred spirits supporting the group, but little actual media coverage of the group, besides The Telegraph. Can you show other media coverage of the group, to demonstrate notability?  If so, then you have a chance. See WP:GNG for more info. There are also duplicate citations.  See WP:DUPCITES. TechnoTalk (talk) 07:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

12:26:37, 30 July 2022 review of submission by Kuralarasan DM
Kuralarasan DM (talk) 12:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)This is My first article to my userpage and I partially completed my initial stage, so finally waiting for review


 * this draft has been rejected as non-notable (and I might add promotional); it will not be considered further. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

17:47:52, 30 July 2022 review of draft by MSLF Project
I want to improve my draft and I would like to know to better write the submission. Is it the tone and language that need to be changed or the sources. I cant tell.

MSLF Project (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * OP blocked. 331dot (talk) 18:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Should I submit Draft:University of Sfax flat Earth controversy to AfC?
My article "University of Sfax flat Earth controversy" was moved to draftspace by another editor 12(!) minutes after I created it. Because that editor's move left behind a redirect, it is now impossible for me (or any other non-admin) to move it back. Should I post it to AfC? Partofthemachine (talk) 23:45, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It's been suggested to you that it may be better for you to add it to the existing article about the university itself. But if you truly feel it should be a standalone article, yes, you should submit it for a review. 331dot (talk) 07:40, 31 July 2022 (UTC)