Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 June 19

= June 19 =

13:36:30, 19 June 2022 review of submission by Obyno2020
Obyno2020 (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * you don't ask a question about the rejected draft. I see that you asked about it back when it was rejected, WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 March 7. Do you have a follow-up question? --bonadea contributions talk 15:15, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

21:59:29, 19 June 2022 review of draft by Melissaecuador
I am not sure how else I can edit my article to make it sound more neutral.

Melissaecuador (talk) 21:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I think that you have a common misunderstanding about what it is we are looking for in articles- a Wikipedia article is not for merely telling of the existence of the topic and what it does. An article about a business must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the business, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable business.  The key here is "significant coverage"- it must be coverage which goes beyond merely telling us the business exists and what it does, and goes in depth about it, such as describing how exactly the business is significant or influential. Wikipedia is not interested in all the media outlets that mention the company, but in what they say about it. Do they say it has a large market share, or a new business model, or has influenced other businesses, or society as a whole, or involved in influential litigation?(just some examples, it's not an exclusive list)  You have some reviews of the company but they are basically advertisements disguised as news stories/magazine articles. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 22:28, 19 June 2022 (UTC)