Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 June 24

= June 24 =

04:01:44, 24 June 2022 review of submission by 2409:4072:6C82:C424:E932:8D0:F394:1A18

 * Maayon (Film)

First it was created as a draft by a promotion company called User:Vision events and promotions and then created to article by their employee. Please move back to draft, because of no notability from reliable sources.2409:4072:6C82:C424:E932:8D0:F394:1A18 (talk) 04:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * This isn't an AfC matter; the article has been in the main space for almost two months now. If you think it fails the relevant notability tests, feel free to take it to AfD. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

04:54:29, 24 June 2022 review of submission by Cgdunnckmbc
Cgdunnckmbc (talk) 04:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * @Cgdunnckmbc if you have a question in mind, please ask it, so we don't have to guess. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

09:15:47, 24 June 2022 review of submission by Yogi aprilio
please help us

Yogi aprilio (talk) 09:15, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * this draft has been rejected, and with very good reason, too; it will not be considered again. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:23, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

12:57:02, 24 June 2022 review of draft by Jitsujay
Hello Wiki..

I am in the process of writing my first article. I though I was doing well. But My first submission can back "not adequately supported by reliable sources". I do understand what that means. But I do not know to what in my article requires more and if it would be easier just to omit anything I can not give a reliable source to. But if someone could assist with what needs to be address, what lines or entries that would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your time.

Jason Carter

Jitsujay (talk) 12:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * @Jitsujay: "omit anything I can not give a reliable source to" — yes, that's pretty much it. You shouldn't be writing an article based on what you know (or think you know) about a subject, but rather summarising what other, reliable, published sources have said about it. In other words, you find a publication, précis its salient points, and cite it as as the source. Rinse and repeat if needed. And if you find yourself writing something that you can't support with a source, then by definition you're getting into a danger area because you're now describing your own understanding or opinion of the subject, or engaging in original research. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:37, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

13:35:24, 24 June 2022 review of submission by ActressVenba
One more reference added in the list, kindly check and approve ActressVenba (talk) 13:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This was rejected, it will not be reviewed again, I suggest you find other topics to edit. Theroadislong (talk) 20:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

19:41:49, 24 June 2022 review of submission by MegaMack02
I can’t bypass the inadequate references reason, and when O find references, there is a sheer lack of them. How can my draft page pass the revision when there are a sheer lack of references I can find? MegaMack02 (talk) 20:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * @MegaMack02 I think you're answering your own question here. If you can't find references then it's not a subject that is going to pass the notability threshold. Nthep (talk) 20:30, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @MegaMack02 I just googled the game and saw a few game site sources/blogs that don't look that great, but the draft must have been deleted already so I can't see what's already there. TechnoTalk (talk) 20:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Fixed link. Nthep (talk) 21:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @TechnoTalk the draft is not deleted, but I’ll be sure to include the references. MegaMack02 (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Added references into the draft, I am resubmitting the draft MegaMack02 (talk) 23:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Odd. I don't see the draft, and don't even see it being created or recreated in the editor's history. TechnoTalk (talk) 19:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

21:55:00, 24 June 2022 review of draft by 24.4.117.226
I am being told that the amount of sources I have are not "significant," but that is to vague too determine what actually needs to be done. Please advise.

24.4.117.226 (talk) 21:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi IP, the issues appear to be multiple. I think it is the quality of the sources along with the depth of coverage about Higdon.  For example, what Higdon says or has written is not usable for notability even if published by an otherwise reliable source.  In addition, sources like YouTube are rarely helpful as YouTube is generally considered unreliable.  I can see it used to support the existence of a documentary by Higdon but that is insufficient.  What is needed is what reliable sources said about Higdon and the documentary.  It kind of boils down to, yes, he did things but until reliable sources have written in-depth about him doing those things, it really is moot from a notability perspective.  Also be wary of sources that exist to advocate for something as they are generally at best weak sources. I hope this provides some clarity.  S0091 (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

22:11:04, 24 June 2022 review of submission by Helloheart
Hello! I have an article that I have created titled Igoeti that is currently graded as Start-Class. Recently, I have been editing this article thoroughly and feel that it may qualify as a C-Class article. Is there any way to have this checked? Thanks! 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 22:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @Helloheart: the article was accepted two months ago, so this is no longer an AfC matter. But FWIW, yes, the Rater tool does predict a C. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)