Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 June 9

= June 9 =

03:02:50, 9 June 2022 review of draft by 174.88.30.132
Am I all ready to go? 174.88.30.132 (talk) 03:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

05:28:49, 9 June 2022 review of submission by Anton Godfrey
Anton Godfrey (talk) 05:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * (Blocked for spamming) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Request on 06:08:46, 9 June 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Natalie EPT
Hello there. I am trying to create a page for The Ectopic Pregnancy Trust. We are a small charity in the UK that works hard to raise awareness of ectopic pregnancy and support those who are affected by it. We work alongside many independent notable organisations who I have listed in the article, on research. We are also a founding member of Baby Loss Awareness Week in the UK, along with SANDS - who are are listed on Wikipedia.

Please can you advise what more I need to do to get our page published? I have listed many of the independent organisations that we work with - and provided the supporting documentation that shows they consider us a credible source of information. The organisations listed include the NHS, the UK Government, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Society for Reproduction and Fertility.

Please can you help? Many thanks.

Natalie EPT (talk) 06:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @Natalie EPT: I'm sure your trust is worthy and does a lot of important work. Alas, in what comes to notability in the Wikipedia context, none of that matters (much); nor does working with notable organisations. Wikipedia only summarises what others have said about a subject, and therefore notability is defined in terms of existing coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. To warrant an article, you need to find significant coverage of your trust in newspapers, TV documentaries, radio programmes, books, etc., and this coverage must be independently produced, not based on eg. the trust's press releases or similar material. You then precis this coverage, citing the sources where it was published. Conversely, without such sources, it will not be possible to publish an article on your trust. (See WP:GNG for more info.) HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

06:42:02, 9 June 2022 review of draft by NeverTry4Me
I need help regarding the Draft. The subject person is notable though, I might missing something. Is there any experienced editor to assist me? I'm yet unable to understand why the draft is pending(after declined), even though I have done a massive edit. I'm yet unable to understand what's wrong with the updated draft. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 06:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You resubmitted it and removed the prior reviews; these must remain on the draft. You actually have too many sources in the draft. A small number of high quality sources are preferable to a large number of low quality sources. Sources that you use must provide significant coverage of this person, not just a brief mention or telling us what they do. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @331dot Thank you. This is what I was missing in the draft. Now your assistance will help me a lot. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 10:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

11:35:45, 9 June 2022 review of submission by Billapartygang123
Please approve my draft. zIt's been 6 months. Billapartygang123 (talk) 11:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability. You will have to move on from this. 331dot (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

14:25:00, 9 June 2022 review of draft by CatIvan
Hello,

1. Am I using correctly the categories and portals for this article? For example: should I use the larger as well well as the narrow scope categories? say: "Canadian>Ontarian>Franco-Ontarian>northern Ontarian", or "Cultural personality>Artist>Visual artist>Painter"

2. What is a good article on how to best use categories and portals?

Thank you! Cat

cat (talk) 14:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @CatIvan: categories and portals have no bearing on the draft's chances of being accepted at AfC. If you want to ask about them more generally, I suggest you do so at the TEAHOUSE. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 03:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

17:53:00, 9 June 2022 review of submission by Nwiles1414
My submission got rejected for being an advert, but we wrote the article as an industry-focused explanation for a new technology process and cited scientific references.

What would we need to change to get it accepted?

Nwiles1414 (talk) 17:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Who is "we"? Accounts are for individuals only. 331dot (talk) 17:59, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You find (and base the article entirely on) published sources wholly independent of the developers. (I can't see the deleted submission, but I'm guessing that all the scientific references were to papers by the people behind the process. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not interested in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is only interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. Wait until other writers, unconnected with the developers, have chosen to write about it - and not just to cite it). ColinFine (talk) 18:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The draft in question was written like a white paper written by the company behind the process right down to including the ™ behind the use of the name. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 18:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

21:49:42, 9 June 2022 review of draft by 2604:CB00:273A:700:2415:39EC:B731:46A1
I need the Just dance controller page

2604:CB00:273A:700:2415:39EC:B731:46A1 (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The sources for this article are almost to a one non-sequiturs. —Jéské Couriano  v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 19:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)