Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 March 17

= March 17 =

07:02:11, 17 March 2022 review of submission by 107.185.157.67
Why Kale My Name doesn’t have page? How do we change that? One of the most popular vegan business in the country, someone should help source this properly.

107.185.157.67 (talk) 07:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. I'm curious as to how you came to be aware of the draft. 331dot (talk) 09:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

08:09:36, 17 March 2022 review of submission by Seniorexpat
My submission was initially declined on 6 December 2021 by one reviewer who left the issue open for other AFC reviewers. Since then I have tried to improve the submission by:

1. getting a link to an honor from the subject's most recent university, and

2. linking to a new honor from peers at an international professional conference.

Therefore I am of good hope that eventually the page will be accepted. The basic problem is that the subject earned his notability more through teaching/business coaching than through publishing. The former is harder to document. Don't you think that the three months' waiting time is enough to deserve a new review? Seniorexpat (talk) 08:09, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * As noted on your draft, "This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,964 pending submissions waiting for review.". Reviews are conducted by volunteers in no particular order, doing what they can when they can.  Please continue to be patient. 331dot (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

13:41:59, 17 March 2022 review of submission by Joaocuginotti
Hi! I would really appreciate a reassessment of my draft, due to I believe it is a notable topic to be included on Wikipedia. If there is not enough information, I could improve on that.

Thank you!

Joaocuginotti (talk) 13:41, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * As the draft was rejected, it will not be considered further. The album does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of notability, as noted by the reviewer. 331dot (talk) 14:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I added some recent coverage, and notified the rejecting editor, asking for the rejection to be reconsidered. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

17:34:29, 17 March 2022 review of submission by Mfulton05
Mfulton05 (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

I added more articles to the page and added in more citations to info that did not have them.
 * There's not enough media coverage of him to meet the notability threshold. See WP:GNG. Notability isn't inherited from his clients. The article has been rejected and will not be considered further. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Please help me understand the notability threshold. I added a bunch of articles that he is the subject of. There are other NFL agents that have similar pages and use similar references. What type of additional articles would be necessary that are not already included? Mfulton05 (talk) 18:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Please read other stuff exists. The existence of other articles has no bearing on the acceptance of your draft, it could be that those other articles are inappropriate.  As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible to get inappropriate articles by us.  We can only address what we know about. If you want to use other articles as a model, make sure they are classified as good articles. If you would like to help us out, you are welcome to identify these other articles you have seen for possible action.  We could use the help. 331dot (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not using that as an argument to get this article published but rather as an question including an example to inquire as to why my article is not approved. As far as I can tell my sources meet the requirements. I am hoping to gain more knowledge as to why this was rejected and what I can do to improve it. Mfulton05 (talk) 18:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Your claim to notability for this person seems to be that they have notable clients. Notability is not inherited by association.  Any article about Mr. Perzley must summarize independent reliable sources that discuss him personally, not just tell us who is clients are or what he does for them.  Has he had an impact on his field?  Created new negotiation techniques? Been involved in litigation that has been impactful to football? (rhetorical questions) Things like that. 331dot (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * How do I show that this is not my claim? Several of the articles that are referenced discuss the contributions he has made to the industry. When those who submitted drafts before me, tried to summarize those contributions the article was rejected for sounding like a resume. I can see that in the submission history. What can I do to better reference those articles while still falling in line with all of the guidelines? An example of such an article is: https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/columnists/christopher-maag/2018/09/13/whirlwind-life-nfl-players-agent/916130002/ Mfulton05 (talk) 18:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * That piece is an interview with him, which is not an independent source. 331dot (talk) 19:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

I have added more articles in the references and throughout the sources that further show the notability of the subject. The subject is a prominent NFL agent who has led the industry. Mfulton05 (talk) 20:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Please do not create additional discussion sections; continue to use this existing one. Restating the same arguments, however, will not help. The draft was rejected and won't be considered further. 331dot (talk) 20:32, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you have new information not considered by the reviewer, please appeal to them directly. 331dot (talk) 20:32, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

17:48:26, 17 March 2022 review of draft by Shariba
Hello, I am new to this process. I've uploaded a photo to WikiCommons, but don't know how to insert it in the article. I accidentally uploaded a second version of the photograph... same result. I know the photographer, but the subject of the article says the photo can be freely used. It is everywhere, in reviews of this author's work. Thank you for any help you can give me.

Article: Draft:Gale_Massey

Shariba (talk) 17:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Just FYI images are not relevant to the draft approval process, which only focuses on the text and sources. That said, it is much easier if the photographer is the one to upload the image. The subject of the image does not usually have copyright unless they have a contract or legal agreement to assign them copyright. 331dot (talk) 18:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I assume photos uploaded to WikiCommons by the original photographer will be acceptable. I'm still working with editors on the text content. Thank you for your reply and the information. Shariba (talk) 18:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

18:23:11, 17 March 2022 review of draft by Niroshwanasinghe
Please help me to uplift the standard of my draft in order to meet the expected criteria of wiki. I have cited the work with almost all available sources. Almost all sources are published by Sri Lanka Air Force as its official publications. Other sources are the documents and certificates which do not fall into wiki referencing criteria. I have adjusted the language as well to meet the standard. Pleas advise me clearly on how to go about this. These details were found out as a project on this character's leadership qualities. I cannot refer to the project report since it is not published and will not be in the future too. Thank you.Niroshwanasinghe (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC) Niroshwanasinghe (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If a subject does not receive significant coverage in independent reliable sources, it doesn't merit a Wikipedia article. 331dot (talk) 18:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

21:53:25, 17 March 2022 review of submission by WMD RJA
Please can you let me know what can be done to make this acceptable to include on Wikipedia. Atlantic Money is a new company, well-financed and looking to make a difference to FX exchange. This page simply reflects details of the company so far. WMD RJA (talk) 21:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. New companies almost never merit articles; companies must be established and receive significant coverage in independent reliable sources, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. Your draft is only sourced to announcements of company activities, which does not establish notability. 331dot (talk) 22:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

22:11:32, 17 March 2022 review of draft by L.knight9604
Our article was declined due to reference not qualifying to be notable enough. We took the feedback, replaced the references, and got declined again. Are you able to provide feedback on what references should be used or taken out so that the article can be approved? Please advise. L.knight9604 (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi . Please clarify what you mean by "our" and "we". The policy on Wikipedia is "one user—one account". Usernames should not be shared by multiple individuals. Are you speaking on behalf of the company? --Worldbruce (talk) 23:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)