Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 March 25

= March 25 =

00:16:04, 25 March 2022 review of submission by GenesisGSE
review of submission by GenesisGSE Below this line, tell us why you are requesting a re-review. Take as many lines as you need.-->}} {Lafc|username=GenesisGSE|ts=00:16:04, 25 March 2022|link=

}} GenesisGSE (talk) 00:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

01:56:50, 25 March 2022 review of submission by Imcdc
This article wass created before by other users and deleted because it seemed to much like advertising. I have created a new version of it which is pretty much based on just factual contents of it. What can be done to make this seem like a company article rather than a promotional tone? Imcdc (talk) 01:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

02:43:51, 25 March 2022 review of draft by 97.119.210.101
Waiting for the draft to be deleted. 97.119.210.101 (talk) 02:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

07:23:57, 25 March 2022 review of submission by Ilieșu Petru
I have tried to upload on the Wikipedia the draft of a CV belonging to a Romanian poet and civic activist (Petru Ilieșu) I also have many references that can sustain the information from CV. Please tell me what kind of information do I need in order to provide a reliable article (respecting the criteria of obiectivity required by Wikipedia) Thank you very much!

See references, below the line:

http://levurelitteraire.com/marcel-cornis-pope-author-translator-editor-and-academician/ ”Romania Post Scriptum” https://diazilla.com/doc/997569/libretto-petru-trilingue---rotary-eklubo-esperanto https://www.biblioteche.comune.parma.it/alpi/it-it/scrivere-poesia-a-timisoara.aspx https://dusic.unipr.it/it/notizie/26-settembre-2019-petru-iliesu-parlera-di-romania-e-europa https://www.amazon.it/Iliesu-Romania-rivoluzione-Quattro-momenti/dp/8832158124 https://www.diacronia.ro/ro/indexing/details/A21734/pdf/October 2014Journal of Literary Studies https://www.erstestiftung.org/en/publications/return-to-europe-a-ten-part-documentary/ http://www.uniuneascriitorilortm.ro/content/ilie%C5%9Fu- https://www.buecher.de/shop/gedichte/rumaenien-postskriptum-romnia-post-scriptum-/iliesu-petru/products_products/detail/prod_id/60560025/ https://shop.falter.at/detail/9783863563158 https://videovest.ro/proiecte/ https://adz.ro/meinung-und-bericht/artikel-meinung-und-bericht/artikel/die-anonymen-menschen-sind-die-wahren-helden https://www.rri.ro/it_it/giornata_europea_delle_lingue_2019_rivoluzione_89_incontro_all_universita_di_parma-2604649 https://books.google.ro/books?id=CVPPGw_ZyO0C&pg=PA51&lpg=PA51&dq=Petru+Ilie%C8%99u&source=bl&ots=ux36-CyK2U&sig=ACfU3U0B03-3Da4jOunIOqwAzL0roJjgDw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiEn-Tw4ezvAhXOl4sKHcKpD4Y4ZBDoATAFegQIBxAD#v=onepage&q=Petru%20Ilie%C8%99u&f=false https://books.google.ro/books?id=MhKxDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA120&lpg=PA120&dq=Petru+Ilie%C8%99u&source=bl&ots=fMgkVbVtt-&sig=ACfU3U2c7FiYyqv_lU_4YTRc7V4ki2AMaw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiEn-Tw4ezvAhXOl4sKHcKpD4Y4ZBDoATAJegQICBAD#v=onepage&q=Petru%20Ilie%C8%99u&f=false https://www.observatorcultural.ro/articol/nonconformistul-petru-iliesu-2/ https://www.lovelybooks.de/autor/Petru-Ilie%C5%9Fu/ https://romanialibera.ro/cultura/arte/destinul-poetului-disident-petru-iliesu--80767 https://books.google.ro/books?id=j2PmEIYMsHUC&pg=PA618&lpg=PA618&dq=Petru+Ilie%C8%99u+Return+to+Europa&source=bl&ots=maZkPWeZlZ&sig=ACfU3U3wsTW3GMRar9WBFzmxtMlDzm3Y7g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwivyP3q5ezvAhVHEncKHaXKD9c4MhDoATAJegQIBhAD#v=onepage&q=Petru%20Ilie%C8%99u%20Return%20to%20Europa&f=false

Ilieșu Petru (talk) 07:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


 * We don't host cirricula vitae in the first place. —Jéské Couriano  v^_^v  a little blue Bori 08:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

10:35:41, 25 March 2022 review of draft by Kateryna mayer
Hi, I want to confirm that the 'reliable souces' issue in my article means that I have too many references to the IT Guild news web pages and their Social-channels news references as a confirmation of my statements? if yes, can I use them in cases when I want to describe a point of view of IT-Guild or its official reaction to some events in the past? In this case, I will be describing its reaction\opinion and I do not show it as a 'truthful statement' Also, will the removal of such kinds of references and adding some other external "news" articles will help to solve the problem? will this approach work? Regards, Kateryna mayer (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, sources to establish notability cannot come from the subject itself. A Wikipedia article about an organization must primarily summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about it, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organization. Wikipedia is not interested much in what an organization says about itself. 331dot (talk) 10:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

14:47:44, 25 March 2022 review of submission by Jorge Granier Phelps
We already added more sources that mention our company, our journalists and the Media outlet itself. We also linked other wikipedia articles related to our journalists and founders.

Please verify these changes and let us publish El American Wikipedia Page. Thanks in advance.

All the best.

Jorge Granier Phelps (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, it will not be considered further, Wikipedia has zero interest in promoting your company. Theroadislong (talk) 14:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

14:57:17, 25 March 2022 review of submission by Nikkimar
I NEED HELP! Trying to get a biography published for a living entrepreneur.

Nikkimar (talk) 14:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about something, Wikipedia summarises what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability. Your draft doesn't even begin to suggest any notability whatsoever. Theroadislong (talk) 15:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

14:59:28, 25 March 2022 review of submission by JanPawel2025
Please see the page on Polish Cyberspace Defense Forces. JanPawel2025 (talk) 14:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , First stick to one thread. No need to create another today. Second, all you did was add more sources covering the creation. This may be a case of WP:TOOSOON if no other coverage is available. Third, thousands of articles are pending in the queue and posting here will not get it reviewed quicker.Slywriter (talk) 18:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

18:16:28, 25 March 2022 review of submission by 41.138.72.11
41.138.72.11 (talk) 18:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


 * This is far too detailed and has too few sources. We're a general encyclopaedia, not Fandom. —Jéské Couriano  v^_^v  a little blue Bori 18:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)