Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 May 11

= May 11 =

00:03:06, 11 May 2022 review of submission by Nautilus126
Nautilus126 (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC) I would like this page to be reviewed again because I believe I have cited enough sources for it to be verifiable, if you wish, I can further remove information in order to make sure it meets your standards for citation. I also believe that the subject Is noteworthy enough for all these articles to be written on her, both in her home country and in others. I am being paid by the subject, so I would just like to get this over with. I would greatly appreciate it if you reconsider and tell me what needs to be added/removed for it to be published. Thank you.


 * @Nautilus126 The draft was rejected, which means it will not be considered further. See the comment by DoubleGrazing in the draft. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 17:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Under the "Submission rejected" comment, there is an "ask for advice" button, which brought me here. It says nothing about a draft not being further considered once it is rejected- in fact, I was directed to this page upon seeing the rejection comment. I do not mean to be rude, but if what you said were the case, why would there be an "ask for advice" button that allows users to request a review?
 * I would just like to know what makes the subject of this article insufficiently notable if there are as many articles about her online as there are. In addition, I would like to know if there is any information in the article that makes it less acceptable for Wikipedia. As I said previously, I am being paid for this article, so I would like to finish this as soon as possible. Thank you and sorry for any confusion. Nautilus126 (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Nautilus126 Yes, you have now correctly asked for advice.  A knowledgeable editor should answer here soon. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 11:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

00:41:40, 11 May 2022 review of draft by Loveleyla
Why is it not allowing me to tag my draft article? Do I need to tag it after I submit it for review? I keep getting the comment, "Please check the draft page title. No such page exists." So does this mean submitting it before tagging it?

Loveleyla (talk) 00:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

01:07:13, 11 May 2022 review of draft by KeithH1969
I submitted my article for review too soon because I was confused about the Publish button. I think it is now ready to review, but am wondering if there is a way to have it informally reviewed. I gether that it is a bad thing to have an article rejected multiple times.KeithH1969 (talk) 01:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

KeithH1969 (talk) 01:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

10:41:22, 11 May 2022 review of draft by Xclusive123
I have tried to publish a profile for the wife of the king of Warri, my draft kept getting declined, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Olori_Atuwatse_III see the draft here, please can you tell me what is wrong

Xclusive123 (talk) 10:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

10:44:09, 11 May 2022 review of submission by Xclusive123
i have been trying to submit a profile for the wife of the king of Warri, but it keeps declining, i will need help to know what i am doing wrongly

here is the draft Draft:Olori Atuwatse III

Xclusive123 (talk) 10:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia does not have "profiles", not a single one. Wikipedia has articles. Your draft was deleted as promotional and a copyright violation. You cannot copy content from other websites to Wikipedia. A Wikipedia article about this person must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about them, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. 331dot (talk) 11:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

12:34:22, 11 May 2022 review of submission by Its4aparna
Hello, please share any changes that can be made to publish the article since it has info relevant to many environmental restoration activities happening around here. Thanks Its4aparna (talk) 12:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * There are no changes you can make, as the draft was rejected and will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about a topic, even if it is a good cause, and to be frank we are not concerned with how an article or lack of one impacts off wiki matters. Any Wikipedia article about this organization must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own(not press releases, announcements, interviews, or brief mentions) to say about the organization, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organization.
 * If you are associated with this organization, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID for information on required formal disclosures. 331dot (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

13:14:46, 11 May 2022 review of draft by Stockholm Writer
I am seeking assistance on how to add the summary box to my draft article. Thank you. Stockholm Writer (talk) 13:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)


 * @Stockholm Writer What 'summary box' are you referring to? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

I copied an 'InfoBox' from another page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stockholm Writer (talk • contribs) 18:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

18:52:56, 11 May 2022 review of submission by Sophie Miao Miao
The last time this draft was declined when a review was requested, the explanation was that "A search in Google, Google News and Google Books does not find sources to justify notability based on on the general notability guideline or the guideline on notability for educational institutions". I'm a little confused, which criteria specifically are not being met? I can't imagine that it's a problem with the notability of the school itself, given that schools that seem similarly notable to me such as Brighton or Vancouver Career College also have a page on Wikipedia. Sophie Miao Miao (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * No organization "has a page" on Wikipedia for its use and benefit; Wikipedia has articles about organizations, which are not under the control of those organizations. Please review the notability criteria for organizations. Your draft just documents the existence of the college and its offerings. Wikipedia articles must do more. Any article about an organization must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the organization, showing how it meets those criteria.  Vancouver Career College has similar issues as your draft, and I will mark it as problematic, thank you for pointing that out.  As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to get by us.  We can only address what we know about. 331dot (talk) 19:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I fixed the coding on your COI declaration. (it had "nowiki" tags around it which suppressed its function).  If you work for the college, you must make the stricter paid editing declaration, a Terms of Use requirement. 331dot (talk) 19:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)