Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 May 24

= May 24 =

06:12:05, 24 May 2022 review of submission by SocialPerson Acro
SocialPerson Acro (talk) 06:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I assume this is about Draft:Acropoliis Design Management Group. You don't ask a question.  You have resubmitted the draft.  Your username suggests an association with this business, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID for information on required formal disclosures.  If your username is meant to indicate a position at your company, it will need to be changed at Special:GlobalRenameRequest; usernames cannot be that of a position or otherwise indicate they are shared. 331dot (talk) 06:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

24 May 2022 review of submission by Kamariazaleka
hi,

Looking for help editing this, as it sounds more like an advertisement as opposed to a biography — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamariazaleka (talk • contribs) 08:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * thank you for your edit. Kamariazaleka (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Request on 11:54:04, 24 May 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Afromherz
Hi! I've been working on a new article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:EverCrypt). Thanks to advice from different reviewers, this article was improved through several iterations. I'm curious about how I can check that it fits the different Wikipedia policies before submitting it again to avoid taking time from editors if I'm missing something obvious. Are there any automated tools for this/further advice that is not already on the wiki?

Thanks!

Afromherz (talk) 11:54, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You're doing it right by asking here. Make sure every single thing is sourced by a reliable third party source, or remove it. WP:RS Put refs after punctuation. MOS:PF  Sentence case for section names. MOS:HEAD Read WP:YFA. TechnoTalk (talk) 00:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

14:27:01, 24 May 2022 review of submission by Michron777
Hello. I was wondering if it is possible for this submission to be changed from rejected to denied instead. At least in this case, the major changes I have made could be considered.

Michron777 (talk) 14:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * For that, you must appeal to the last reviewer directly. 331dot (talk) 14:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * "to help children know the Holy Bible and grow up with desirable role models" is totally unacceptable proselytizing, the rest is just blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 14:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

It is possible that an article could be written about this show; but this blatant advertisement is not it. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  15:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

15:55:31, 24 May 2022 review of submission by Arshuspeaks
I have added more reliable and valueable sources to prove the person notability.

Arshuspeaks (talk) 15:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC) Arshuspeaks (talk) 15:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Poorly written and poorly sourced autobiography, with no chance of being accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 16:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

16:16:43, 24 May 2022 review of submission by 80sloVerS1
A page for singer Stacey Jackson was put up for deletion back in Oct 2021 as some parts were judged as too promotional. We didn't know back then and couldn't amend anything so it has since been fully deleted, but we now have realised and would like to revive or re-start a page. Stacey Jackson is on Sky TV weekly and is a singer/songwriter, who, although has a PR team, is in the public eye organically too. How can I get a page back up for her profile? Thank you for any help 80sloVerS1 (talk) 16:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * There are zero "pages" or "profiles" on Wikipedia, we have articles on notable people. Theroadislong (talk) 17:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

16:23:03, 24 May 2022 review of submission by 92.76.110.246
Würzbach is editor-in-chief for biggest newspaper in Germany ! 92.76.110.246 (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Then you should be able to find at least three reliable sources that discuss him in depth. Theroadislong (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter what or who she is,(*) it only matters what others have said about her in independent and reliable secondary sources. The draft only cites two sources, one of which is Springer's own website, and therefore not independent. The other, SZ, is basically appointment news, which comes under routine business reporting.
 * (*) Yes, some positions are inherently notable, eg. elected legislators, top-level athletes, professors in named chairs, etc., but this does not include newspaper editors.
 * Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

17:41:17, 24 May 2022 review of submission by ManiLLa
is literally the next csgo major after antwerp 2022, why mine is not accepted
 * Because your draft Draft:IEM Rio 2022 has zero sources, that is what we base articles on. Theroadislong (talk) 17:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)