Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 November 8

= November 8 =

00:24:34, 8 November 2022 review of submission by 106.69.212.205
Without detail it is difficult to assess why the reviewer has rejected this article based on whether or not it is notable. The company subject to the article is considered notable as: 1. There is significant coverage of the company outside of its own releases, including in a variety of mainstream and industry press. 2. The article has been drafted to try and include significant coverage, while others behind paywalls (i.e. https://www.ft.com/content/3a2c371f-3d1e-4628-8288-0cc12ba9dbb3) have been excluded. 3. Where secondary source coverage cannot be found, primary sources (such as peer review articles and government reports) have been used. Only one non-independent article has been used as media coverage couldn't be found.

106.69.212.205 (talk) 00:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

02:10:18, 8 November 2022 review of submission by Matthew.hbar
To say that the Hangry Barboons is a topic that is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia is hypocritical. If the Bored Ape Yatch Club has its own wiki page, then so should the Hangry Barboons. Hedera Hashgraph is a 3rd generation type "blockchain" and is not as widely used as Ethereum (Bored Apes blockchain). Hangry Barboons are the leading NFT on Hedera Hashgraph and is very notable for crypto in general. Lastly, after 4 rejected submissions for reasons other than notability, why is this being denied just now, the 5th time, for lack of notability? Why wasn't it dismissed the first time? I appeal this decision based on the fact that this is the most notable NFT on Hedera Hashgraph to date. Hangry Barboons is to Hedera as Bored Apes is to Ethereum. Just because Bored Apes sell for hundreds of thousands is not a reason for denial. Matthew.hbar (talk) 02:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @matthew.hbar: wikipedia has a very specific definition of notability, see notability. the tl;dr of it is that you need at least 2 or 3 independent, reliable sources that cover the subject significantly. click the blue links for a thorough explanation of those terms.
 * oh yes, and none of your sources are independent. lettherebedarklight〔晚安 おやすみ〕ping me when replying 04:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Please read other stuff exists. 331dot (talk) 07:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

07:41:53, 8 November 2022 review of draft by 178.112.148.73
178.112.148.73 (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

please replace all text
 * This is not the place to use the speedy deletion template. If you are requesting your draft be deleted, use that template on the draft. 331dot (talk) 07:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

08:23:34, 8 November 2022 review of submission by Agoellis
Hello sir, Thank you for your quick review on my Article, Sir i am very new and i am doing my best ability and knowledge. so sir please guide me to approve this Article. Agoellis (talk) 08:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @agoellis: your draft has been rejected, and will never be accepted. lettherebedarklight〔晚安 おやすみ〕ping me when replying 08:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Respected sir, please guide me to accepted this draft. Agoellis (talk) 08:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * As noted, rejection means there is nothing that you can do to get the draft accepted. No amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. I see that you declared a conflict of interest, if you work for Mr. Goel, you must make the stricter paid editing disclosure, a Terms of Use requirement. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Agoellis Or, if you ARE Mr. Goel. David10244 (talk) 05:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes Agoellis (talk) 11:29, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Agoellis I thought so, from your account name.  (@331dot was on the right track!)  Based on  what the experienced editors have told you here, you won't  be able to get an autobiography accepted. David10244 (talk) 07:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

14:45:23, 8 November 2022 review of draft by TheJusticeBear
First because I am not understanding why Draft:Kima drink was declined. I would appreciate if you could let me know on what does it differs from this article from a similar drink that I actually used as base to write mine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laranjada

TheJusticeBear (talk) 14:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @TheJusticeBear: the draft was declined because it isn't adequately referenced, and notability per hasn't been established. Instagram and Facebook are not acceptable sources, and the others, with the possible exception of the last one (listed twice), do not satisfy the WP:GNG notability standard. Also, as you haven't cited your sources, only listed them, it is impossible to see how much of the content they actually support; please see WP:REFB for advice on referencing using inline citations. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I have added some articles and videos (i.e. Mundo Marca Açores T2 - Programa nº 27 - Melo Abreu - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iQ7qOumX3Y) as references... does it help? TheJusticeBear (talk) 15:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @TheJusticeBear You Tube is generally not acceptable as a reference.  Also, please see WP:OSE David10244 (talk) 05:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

17:37:07, 8 November 2022 review of submission by 2A02:2F09:A101:EA00:D491:DF9:E796:A5B5
2A02:2F09:A101:EA00:D491:DF9:E796:A5B5 (talk) 17:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You don't ask a question, and it doesn't look like you've submitted any drafts (or if you have, then you must have done it from another IP or from your account). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

19:20:32, 8 November 2022 review of submission by Richard96xxx
Richard96xxx (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * A blank submission is not going to be accepted under any circumstances. —Jéské Couriano  v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 19:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

21:07:42, 8 November 2022 review of draft by StanFuk
Please review it. StanFuk (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You have submitted it for review and it is pending. As noted on the draft, this could take some time, so please be patient. 331dot (talk) 21:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Can you not review it?--StanFuk (talk) 22:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Can you say why your draft should be reviewed ahead of those of hundreds of other people? Do you have a particular need for a speedy review? 331dot (talk) 22:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)