Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 October 13

= October 13 =

06:05:20, 13 October 2022 review of draft by Fakehair
Fakehair (talk) 06:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Good morning;

Hope everyone is well. I know everyone is very busy reviewing many draft articles and you have your hans full. But, my article was denied a couple of times and with the guidance of the staff, believe I have lots of progress. Thanks to you. If anyone can ssist me in getting to the finish line, I would greatly appreciated the help...Hope to talk to someone soon..

Thank you

User :Fakehair
 * Hello, . The references in your draft are bare URLs. This is suboptimal. I suggest that you expand your references by including full bibliographic details. This makes it much easier for reviewers to assess the reliability of the sources. Please read Referencing for beginners. Cullen328 (talk) 06:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Also,, you included unreferenced content like . You simply cannot include unreferenced opinionated commentary like this in an encyclopedia article. It is a violation of multiple Wikipedia policies such as Verifiability, the Neutral point of view and Biographies of living people. Cullen328 (talk) 06:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you Cullen328 for your contribution. I Started working on referencing then got really tired. I will certainly get back to it...Thank you so much and have a wonderful day..... Fakehair (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Good afternoon Cullen328, Per your advice, i made the changes needed. At your convenience, please, take another look at the draft and contribute where necessary. Thank you for your assistance.. Fakehair (talk) 17:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

09:30:46, 13 October 2022 review of submission by Anujguptahmsc
Anujguptahmsc (talk) 09:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected and will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves or post their resume. Please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

10:25:29, 13 October 2022 review of submission by Ramsir ji
Ramsir ji (talk) 10:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question. As noted above to an unregistered user, the draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

10:58:49, 13 October 2022 review of draft by 2603:7080:2A42:2DF9:95BA:9730:51B8:7BEE
I would like to add the articles however failed at first attempt. Would appreciate advice while reviewing other versions. 2603:7080:2A42:2DF9:95BA:9730:51B8:7BEE (talk) 10:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Firstly, please log into your account.
 * Secondly, note that Wikipedia is not a marketing platform for a business to promote themselves.
 * Thirdly, the draft gives no reason to believe this website/whatever is notable, per WP:GNG or any other guideline. Not least, because the draft doesn't cite a single useful source. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:02, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

13:07:50, 13 October 2022 review of submission by Evie.rr
How do I request a second review if my original administrator has said they won't review my re-submission? Thanks.

Evie.rr (talk) 13:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Evie.rr: you can't; this draft has been rejected and won't be reviewed again. As explained on your user talk page, it's time to drop this one and find something else to write about. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)