Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 October 15

= October 15 =

11:44:28, 15 October 2022 review of draft by MoisesBlake
MoisesBlake (talk) 11:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Bienvenido Bones Bañez, Jr. Metropolitan Manila Museum Exhibit Video As I reported in Highbrow on August 27, 2018, the work of painter Bienvenido Bones Bañez, Jr. was featured this summer at the Metropolitan Museum of Manila as a notable museum.

The following video was part of that instillation. https://carterkaplan.blogspot.com/2018/10/bienvenido-banez-jr-mmm-exhibit-video.html?m=1
 * Contacting Checkuser. —Jéské Couriano  v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 18:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

14:59:18, 15 October 2022 review of draft by TheBobs9
I feel like my draft that I have made in August is not too notable. I have found reliable sources by the website that editors use for references. I am not sure if you guys have the link to the draft but it is Draft: Tyler Brennan (ice hockey). One of the links that a decliner put up was to see if the player is notable or not. I checked and it said "plays for a team in the NHL. Some other leagues were told in that sentence. The player was drafted by an NHL team on July 8 this year. What can I do? TheBobs9

TheBobs9 (talk) 14:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @TheBobs9 Drafted is not the same as has played for an NHL team, many get drafted but never actually play in the NHL. The new WP:NSPORT also requires that there is some significant reliable coverage on the subject. This is beyond just proving they have played but someone else has decided to write about them in detail on their own accord and publish it in a reliable source. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:03, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @TheBobs9 There's an ongoing discussion about the NHOCKEY notability criteria, and it's currently not entirely clear what exactly is required to qualify. Meanwhile, if you could show that this person satisfies the WP:GNG standard, that would be pretty uncontroversial, but I guess that's a big ask for someone who only just got drafted. Either way, just waiting a while could help. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

15:09:24, 15 October 2022 review of submission by Joscoboy98
Joscoboy98 (talk) 15:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Please see the comments left by reviewers on the draft. 331dot (talk) 15:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

17:43:31, 15 October 2022 review of draft by Ishra7
To whom it may concern,

I recently wrote a biography about an Indian Cricket coach, with all the information provided about him, also listing his awards and career. But Wikipedia keeps declining it saying that it doesn't qualify as Wikipedia content. I have included references and followed the template of how a biography is written in Wikipedia. Could you please check what is wrong and pls let me know so I can make the necessary changes. The draft name is " Mirza Rahamatullah Baig"

with regards, Ishra7

Ishra7 (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every biographical claim that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to an in-depth, non-routine, independent-of-the-subject news/scholarly source with an identifiable author and subjected to rigourous fact-checking that can confirm it or (if no such sources can be found) removed. This is a hard requirement when writing about living people on Wikipedia and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. —Jéské Couriano  v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 18:03, 15 October 2022 (UTC)