Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 October 3

= October 3 =

03:45:41, 3 October 2022 review of submission by M Raisfath
I create those page to redirect users into intended article: Horseshoe magnet. Because horseshoe magnet also known as 'U-shaped magnet', because it's U-shape (or U-shaped). And if those page was declined, rejected, and/or deleted, please tell me more details as soon as possible. Thanks! M Raisfath (talk) 03:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Please follow the instructions the reviewer left on your draft to request the creation of a redirect. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

09:49:10, 3 October 2022 review of draft by Writerfromindia
Hi. I just wanted to check how long I had to edit the article and resubmit before it's deleted. Looking forward to your response.

Writerfromindia (talk) 09:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no deadline for resubmission as long as you are actively working on it. Drafts are automatically marked for deletion after six months of inactivity. Be aware that anything on the organization's website cannot be used to establish that it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. Wikipedia is not interested in what the Foundation says about itself, but in what independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose on their own to say about it(not the organization website, staff interviews, press releases, basic announcements). Please read Your First Article.
 * I see that you declared a COI; if you work for the Foundation or are otherwise compensated by them, the Terms of Use require you to make the stricter paid editing disclosure. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

10:30:38, 3 October 2022 review of submission by Brbs.kh
Can I edit the text and re-submit? Brbs.kh (talk) 10:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No, rejection means resubmission is not possible. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * What can I do? Should I delete it and re-write it? Thank for your reply 331dot. Brbs.kh (talk) 11:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No, that will not help. Have you read WP:NCORP? I see that several reviewers have pointed you to that guideline. If the company is not notable, no amount of rewriting will make an article about it acceptable for the encyclopaedia. --bonadea contributions talk 11:37, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

13:07:41, 3 October 2022 review of draft by Niaz.ahmad222
Niaz.ahmad222 (talk) 13:07, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * What is your question, @Niaz.ahmad222? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * None of your sources are any good; they just document that the company exists. Notability, as measured by significant coverage in third-party sources with editorial oversight, is our measuring stick for determining if a given topic should have an article. —Jéské Couriano  v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 19:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

19:17:21, 3 October 2022 review of draft by 2601:5C7:4100:3600:D4BE:3A0B:59F9:4B3D
Hi,

I am seeking tips on how to find reliable sources to put in articles.

2601:5C7:4100:3600:D4BE:3A0B:59F9:4B3D (talk) 19:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * This draft starts: "Cryogenecist, more commonly referred to as Low Temperature Physicists, is a scientist who practices the profession of Cryogenics." The rest of the draft describes cryogenics, and thus is an attempt at what we call a content fork of the article Cryogenics. The draft appears to be completely superfluous. -- Hoary (talk) 23:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)