Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 April 16

= April 16 =

02:08:43, 16 April 2023 review of submission by SATEssayWebsiteContributer
I don't know why my page got rejected, it wasn't inappropriate or anything likewise. SATEssayWebsiteContributer (talk) 02:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @SATEssayWebsiteContributer: it was rejected because it is completely inappropriate for a global encyclopaedia, and reads more like a script for the local-interest section of your regional TV news programme. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I hate to be so blunt,, but I see zero evidence that you are a notable person as Wikipedia defines that term. Your draft indicates that you are a twelve year old kid who has accomplished nothing other than playing amateur basketball at a very low level. I encourage you to drop this and move on. Focus on improving actual encyclopedia articles instead of trying to promote your pre-teen self. Cullen328 (talk) 05:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah I agree thanks for the feedback 👍 2605:B100:909:CE95:D9BB:FC63:DA02:294B (talk) 06:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks for the feedback but I’m not talking about myself I’m taking about a friend but I still understand the point 👏🏿 2605:B100:909:CE95:D9BB:FC63:DA02:294B (talk) 06:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Request on 12:19:32, 16 April 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Newlywo
Hello there, I do not understand why thi draft is declined... even if IMDB isnt a source, there are many others on the draft.. can someone please help? in the meantime, I will remove it and resubmit Newlywo (talk) 12:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Newlywo: the sources are insufficient to establish notability per WP:GNG. We need to see significant coverage of him in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources.
 * Also, in articles on living people, all material statements, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal details such as DOB must be clearly referenced with inline citations to reliable published sources. Currently most of such information is unreferenced. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi there, I would like to address what you wrote please, here goes;
 * I placed 14 References! all are reliable and independent sources, i.e
 * 14 Kan - the biggest tv channel in Israel and also the public broadcasting channel
 * tlvfest - Tel Aviv’s International LGBTQ Film Festival
 * jer-cin - The Jerusalem Cinematheque was established in 1974
 * haaretz - one of the biggest newspaper in Israel and it's daily
 * so, to say there isnt a significant coverage or not good sources, is simply not right.
 * Can you please re-review this inlight of what I wrote? because I understand it's Israeli but this person won awards and not someone who is not worthy of an article... Thank you! Newlywo (talk) 11:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @Newlywo: it doesn't matter if there are 14 references or even 140; what matters is the quality of those references. And by 'quality', I mean whether they meet every aspect of the WP:GNG standard at once. In other words, it's not enough that one source is reliable, another is secondary, and yet another provides significant coverage – they all (the ones you wish to rely on to establish notability) must be all of those things. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * To elaborate further on this, of the four sources you've listed here, 2 and 3 are primary, so I'm just going to ignore those. Nos. 1 and 4 are secondary, and probably also reliable and independent, but they don't provide significant coverage of Landsman himself, and instead describe programme content he has created. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @DoubleGrazing Hi, thanks for the explantion, thats first. I listed just 4 but there are others as you can see. For example we have closeupinitiative, docushuk, this, I can add this and this if you think I should and I assume there are more. I didnt want to overload with sources..

With that being said, should I resubmit? Newlywo (talk) 15:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Newlywo: yes, I realise there are other sources also, but you brought up those four specifically to support your contention that the sourcing is adequate, and I'm using the same four to make my point that it's not. Feel free to highlight the ones that you think fully meet the GNG standard, and I'll be happy to take another look.
 * ...or, indeed, resubmit the draft, if you're confident that it demonstrates notability, and/or you don't think you can find better sources. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @DoubleGrazing Hi, thank you again! I under stand what you wrote and my bad for not knowing I should name all sources. I did however named a few more sources on my privious message here and would love if you can have a look. 2 of them are not listed in the draft as you can see... Newlywo (talk) 08:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

14:10:14, 16 April 2023 review of submission by 71.161.222.115
71.161.222.115 (talk) 14:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * You don't ask a question, but this draft has been rejected and won't be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

18:20:21, 16 April 2023 review of submission by 42.107.192.61

19:11:14, 16 April 2023 review of submission by 42.107.192.201
42.107.192.201 (talk) 19:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Removed pasting of draft. Please ask a question not paste a copy of the draft here. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 22:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

21:32:20, 16 April 2023 review of submission by LucianMaganBall
I would like know why this Draft: Draft:Territorial.io has "unreliable refrences", im a sorta new to this whole wikipedia thing so there might be a simple reason for this

LucianMaganBall (talk) 21:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @LucianMaganBall many of the sources user-generated and/or do not have editorial oversight, like a newspaper does for example. Please read through the links in the decline notice.  You may also find Your first article helpful.  S0091 (talk) 22:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

23:46:02, 16 April 2023 review of submission by 71.161.222.115
71.161.222.115 (talk) 23:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * You don't ask a question but this draft has been rejected and won't be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)