Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 April 29

= April 29 =

04:31, 29 April 2023 review of submission by IVickyChoudhary
Why it looks like an asvertisement, I wrote whatever I got on google search. I saw his work that's why decide to create his Wiki profile. IvivekChoudhary (talk) 04:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Kindly revert back and guide. IvivekChoudhary (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hosts: there's a draft, plus an article in mainspace that's proposed for deletion.  The latest note on the draft is a decline. Seems like too many "things".  Also, I'm not sure I  believe the "own work" tag on the image. David10244 (talk) 06:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * When I'm creating the article, I don't know by that time about the already drafted article of same person. That deletion tag was placed because of a misleading news article(Award name similar to Dada saheb falke award). Now guide me that on which article I work, draft one or new one? IvivekChoudhary (talk) 07:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

05:13, 29 April 2023 review of submission by Isukchainsingh
Respected Team,

I submitted my article regarding a person who is serving the Indian army and is also an athlete but my submission was declined many times I need help for posting my article. Help me with this, please.

Thanks Isukchainsingh (talk) 05:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, . Your draft biography of a living person is entirely unreferenced. Please be aware that unreferenced biographies of living people are a policy violation. Your draft cannot possibly be accepted unless you provide references to significant coverage of this person in reliable, independent sources. This is mandatory. Please read Referencing for beginners. Cullen328 (talk) 05:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

05:40, 29 April 2023 review of submission by Tunnizar
Sorry, Don't Delete Here This Original: User:Tunnizar/The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids Tunnizar (talk) 05:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Tunnizar: deletion hasn't been requested or proposed, at this time. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

07:33:01, 29 April 2023 review of draft by Biodam
Biodam (talk) 07:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * What is your question, @Biodam? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I don’t know why wazzy records page got declined? Please what’s the errors, can you help fix it Biodam (talk) 07:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @Biodam: as it says in the decline notices and comments (did you read them?), the draft is promotional, and there is no obvious notability.
 * Also, if you have a conflict of interest in the subject, you must disclose it. I have posted instructions on your user talk page. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, . Your draft is full of overtly promotional language like and  and . Promotion, advertising and marketing is not permitted on Wikipedia, and all drafts must comply with core content policies like the Neutral point of view. Cullen328 (talk) 07:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I understand now Biodam (talk) 08:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

08:08, 29 April 2023 review of submission by Shrivathsa Rao
Hello, my page was declined mentioning, no reliable sources for the information provided in the page, My Answer: " the page is about an upcoming film in Kannada Film Industry, and I am the director of the said film, hence I acknowledge all information provided are official, reliable & perfect details of the movie" So I finally request to review the page again & grant it go live. Shrivathsa Rao (talk) 08:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Shrivathsa Rao: sorry, but we will need to see actual published sources; more specifically, multiple secondary sources that are both reliable and fully independent, and provide significant coverage of the subject.
 * Also, you need to formally disclose your conflict of interest; I have posted a message on your user talk page with more information. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

13:22, 29 April 2023 review of submission by Gianoseduto
Dear NP83,

I not so recently submitted an article to Wikipedia, titled High Stone Games, which was unfortunately rejected for not meeting the notability guidelines.

I would like to request some clarifications and advice on how to improve the article and resubmit it in the future. Specifically, I would appreciate your input on the following points:

Specific reasons: Could you please provide me with specific reasons why my article was rejected? I would like to understand which aspects of the article did not meet the notability guidelines or any other criteria that may apply.

Guidance: Could you please provide me with guidance on how to improve my article to meet Wikipedia's standards? I would appreciate any specific suggestions on how to make it more notable and how to provide more reliable sources to support its claims.

Community assistance: Could you please suggest any ways I can seek assistance from the Wikipedia community in improving my article? This may include reaching out to other editors or administrators, or seeking advice from forums or social media groups dedicated to Wikipedia.

Open-mindedness: I am open-minded to constructive criticism and feedback. I understand that Wikipedia's standards are high and that rejection does not necessarily mean that my article is not worth publishing. I am willing to use the feedback I receive to improve my article and make it more notable and informative.

Thank you for taking the time to review my article and for your assistance in improving it. I look forward to your response.

Sincerely, gianoseduto Gianoseduto (talk) 13:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Gianoseduto: this draft has a number of issues, but they can mostly be dealt with by editing. The one problem that no amount of editing can resolve, which is the reason this was declined and then rejected, is lack of notability. To establish notability per WP:GNG, we need to see significant coverage, directly of the subject, in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. The reviewers contend that this standard has not been met.
 * You may enquire at the WikiProject Video games, to see if someone is interested in collaborating with you to develop an article on this subject, but don't get your hopes up too much. In any case, even then you would need to start by finding sufficient sources to satisfy the GNG notability requirement. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:34, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

14:07, 29 April 2023 review of submission by Hamdymaster
i need help for publishing Wikipedia article Veronica Studio 14:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * that draft has been rejected, and I've just requested that both it and your sandbox one be deleted.


 * Please don't create multiple copies of the same content.


 * I've no idea what 'Veronica Studio' is. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

15:54, 29 April 2023 review of submission by Inchwiki
The draft was declined because it did not meet the Wiki standard for inline citations. I agree more inline citations could be useful, but the Wiki page on minimal standards for inline citations mentions 4 types of statement which require inline citation. As far as I can see the article does not contain any statements of those kinds. So some clarification here would be useful. Inchwiki (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Inchwiki: you may be right in saying that you don't strictly speaking have to add more inline citations (although the 'likely to be challenged' situation is pretty open-ended, and could well apply here), but IMHO they are the gold standard of referencing and should really be used at all times. Is there any reason why you don't want to add more of them?
 * The reason why many reviewers (among others) prefer inline citations is that they make it very clear where the information comes from, ie. which source has provided which bit of content, and how much of the content remains unsupported. You would be greatly assisting in this if you provided inline citations throughout.
 * Or put it this way: there are several paragraphs without a single citation. From where did you get all that information? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

17:23, 29 April 2023 review of submission by Hickeygamez
This page has been declined a few times, but it seems like it has made some notable steps for improvement (the topic is now indexed with Medline, recently featured in many news articles). Do you think it is worth submitting now? Hickeygamez (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)