Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 April 7

= April 7 =

03:18:38, 7 April 2023 review of submission by Hold your horses
Context:
 * I've done some editing in the past, and two weeks ago got a notice on my talk page saying "Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer."
 * For my next article (White Oak Pastures) I decided to go through the Articles for creation / draft process again, to see what kind of feedback I got
 * I received the following feedback: "Comment: reads in a very promotional manner is there a conflict of interest here? Theroadislong (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)"
 * I responded, clarifying there was no COI, and asked for clarification regarding which parts were "very promotional"
 * I waited a week, hadn't gotten a response, so I decided to create the article in the main namespace (rather than moving the draft into the main namespace, which I now understand would have been better practice)
 * Today (April 6) the draft seems to have been reviewed again, and this time the feedback was more specific: "Concurring with User:Onel5969's statement that this draft is very promotional, the section on carbon sequestration is a coatrack that is not directly applicable to the subject, that appears to have been inserted to praise the subject business." . The feedback also pointed out the fact that there are now two copies of the article, the draft and the one in the main namespace.
 * I removed the "coatrack" section from both the draft version, and the main namespace version

Question: should I add the proposed deletion to the top of the draft namespace version?

Thanks, Hold your horses (talk) 03:18, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Hold your horses: if you want the draft space version to be deleted, you cannot PROD it as that only works in the main article space; you can instead either request G7 speedy deletion, or blank the content which amounts to the same. There is a possibility that an admin will look at the edit history and conclude that you're not the only editor with substantive edits (which is a condition for G7 deletions) and decline the request, but it's worth a try. Failing that, if you just leave it sitting there, in six months' time it will go stale and be deleted automatically anyway. (Technically we should get the draft's history merged into that of the main space article, but as the only edits up to the point when you copypaste-moved it are yours, there seems little point in this.)
 * Needless to say but I'll say it anyway, please don't do any more copy-/cut-and-paste moves in the future; they cause all sorts of problems.
 * Lastly, a minor point: the reason you didn't get a response to your COI comment is probably that the editor who queried it never saw your comment. Simply using the '@' symbol doesn't automatically create a message alert on article/draft space pages, you need to use a reply template, see template:reply to. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

08:47:50, 7 April 2023 review of submission by 103.158.91.34
he is a most different person in delhi who had helped out many people and remembered for his work but some people donot know him who don't like him, at the age of 14 he had a computer knowledge based skill and it really helped many people so he should be remember 103.158.91.34 (talk) 08:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Do you have a question you wish to ask? This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:53, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

10:34:36, 7 April 2023 review of draft by Thoppy234
I am requesting for the Article draft TOKUNBO OMISHAKIN be published and the article on TOK OMISHAKIN be deleted while the URL of the drafted be changed. I would like to know what it will take for that.

Thoppy234 (talk) 10:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That's not going to happen, you are free to improve the article here Toks Omishakin but it has been tagged for deletion. Theroadislong (talk) 10:45, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

17:33:29, 7 April 2023 review of submission by 103.105.87.153
103.105.87.153 (talk) 17:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * You don't ask a question, but this drat has been rejected and won't be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

18:55:14, 7 April 2023 review of submission by Benicioleite2122
how to i improve my article?

please help me, my article about ngg is going to get refused to get qualified for the last time and will get deleted, how do i improve?????????????????????????????

Benicioleite2122 (talk) 18:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Benicioleite2122: you don't improve, because this has been rejected and won't be considered again; it has also been marked for speedy deletion.
 * And please don't start multiple threads here, just add to your earlier one. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

20:00:14, 7 April 2023 review of draft by NaomiUIL
I am trying to publish a page on behalf of my professor and boss Junfeng Jiao. Can you update the page title to Junfeng Jiao not DR. JunGfeng Jiao. Also this is my first time, thank you for your help with the process. NaomiUIL (talk) 20:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @NaomiUIL: if/when this draft gets accepted, it will be moved to its actual title, which won't include the 'Dr', as per TITLESINTITLES. For now, we can leave it where it is.
 * Given your relationship with the subject, you need to make a formal conflict of interest (COI) disclosure. I've posted instructions on your talk page on how to do this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

21:33:16, 7 April 2023 review of submission by Niswins
Niswins (talk) 21:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Niswins you do ask a question but read WP:NOTPROMO and the notability guidelines for companies. S0091 (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

23:45:08, 7 April 2023 review of draft by Briankweiner
Briankweiner (talk) 23:45, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * What is your question, @Briankweiner? The draft has been resubmitted and is awaiting review. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)