Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 February 23

= February 23 =

05:21:47, 23 February 2023 review of submission by Shyamalogic
Shyamalogic (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The article has been rejected, which means you cannot submit it again. -- asilvering (talk) 05:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Because Madhyanchal Professional University is a private university of Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. It was established in 2018. i will correct the content in this wikipedia article.

Shyamalogic (talk) 07:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

This article not duplicate Draft:Madhyanchal Professional University because this is rejected

Shyamalogic (talk) 07:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Please re-review again i corrected content which unwanted Or Can i ask for create another page with this page name. Please guide me.

Shyamalogic (talk) 07:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Please do not start new sections for each new message. Just edit this section and add your comments here. --bonadea contributions talk 08:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank can you help me that page for deletion Shyamalogic (talk) 09:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Request on 07:00:05, 23 February 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Himalayaeduhub
07:00:05, 23 February 2023 review of submission by Himalayaeduhub

{{SAFESUBST:Void| {{Lafc|username=Himalayaeduhub|ts=07:00:05, 23 February 2023|link=

}}

Himalayaeduhub (talk) 07:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @Himalayaeduhub If your sandbox is what you submitted,  it has no content. David10244 (talk) 09:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

09:26:13, 23 February 2023 review of submission by 212.70.118.246
Actor has done sufficient roles in the industry, and is a successful TV star actor. Page can be published.

212.70.118.246 (talk) 09:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Declined 5 times, rejected twice, deleted three times, please stop. Theroadislong (talk) 09:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Request on 10:44:17, 23 February 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Thehifivemedia
Thehifivemedia (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Article deleted, poster blocked as a promo/spam only account. Nthep (talk) 20:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

16:57:32, 23 February 2023 review of submission by AustinSpotter
I feel like this Hotel deserves a page. The Convention Center Hotel in Portland Oregon for example, which is also a Hyatt Regency has a page so why can't this? Many hotels have their own page and this hotel is one of the largest in Utah and it definitely deserves a page. What harm is it doing by having its own page? AustinSpotter (talk) 16:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has articles, not pages. This is not a database of hotels, this is an encyclopedia with criteria for inclusion, called notability. You have no independent reliable sources to support the content of the article. To merit an article, you must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the hotel, showing how it meets the definition of notability. "Largest hotel in Utah" might work, but you must have independent sources to summarize. 331dot (talk) 17:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Please see other stuff exists. The existence of other articles has no bearing on this. A large convention center often receives coverage as it hosts events. 331dot (talk) 17:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry for this, but the Portland Hyatt Regency is smaller than the SLC Hyatt Regency and yet both are attached to huge convention centers and the SLC Regency is a part of a larger convention center than the Portland one but somehow the Portland one deserves a page and not the SLC one... The SLC convension center has 515,000 sq ft of convention space and Portland only has around 250,000 sq ft... Just saying your reasoning doesn't make sense when the Portland once exists also. I can find a better source but I feel like the SLC Hyatt Regency deserves a page. AustinSpotter (talk) 19:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You continue to miss the point, it may qualify for an article but the onus is on you to prove it meets our inclusion criteria of Notability through proper sourcing. Doubling down and fixating Other stuff exists type arguments, will only lead to more frustration for you. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 19:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * (ec) Perhaps the Portland one should be deleted, I don't know, which is why each article or draft is considered on its own merits. As I said, you have no independent sources in the draft. The one source you do have is a press release from Hyatt, which is not an independent source. 331dot (talk) 19:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

19:30:00, 23 February 2023 review of submission by Rousselmarc
Would like to know what i need to change or add for it to be approved Rousselmarc (talk) 19:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * There is nothing in your draft User:Rousselmarc/sandbox to suggest that they pass WP:NMUSICIAN, being influenced by notable artists doesn't make them notable too? Theroadislong (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

20:51:03, 23 February 2023 review of submission by 2A02:C7E:3AC6:4100:AD06:A3D7:6663:9847
I do not understand why my article has been rejected. The only way to get a new thing in science widely accepted among the growing population is to put it out there for people to discover. Even if it seems unrealistic, there is nothing untrue about the lockhart as it was invented under the same circumstances as widely used units such as the newton and the volt. Thank you for your time.

FYI it was not I who invented the lockhart so it is not biased at all 2A02:C7E:3AC6:4100:AD06:A3D7:6663:9847 (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Please see What Wikipedia is not. Nthep (talk) 20:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * IP user, Wikipedia does not lead, it follows- only when a subject is out there, discussed by independent reliable sources who choose on their own to discuss it, can a subject then merit a Wikipedia article. You should use social media or a personal website to spread the word about this. 331dot (talk) 21:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, there's at least one grammar error... plus this: "In SI base units, 1 lockhart = 1 m^2s^-3, or 1 meter squared per second cubed".  Minus 3 is not "cubed". David10244 (talk) 05:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I meant to say "raised to the -3 power is not cubed". David10244 (talk) 11:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)