Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 January 26

= January 26 =

10:02:49, 26 January 2023 review of submission by Asad Ali Jutt
Asad Ali Jutt (talk) 10:02, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I've removed the contents of the draft, as there is a link present just above. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a form of social media where people tell the world about themselves.  Please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 10:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

14:49:35, 26 January 2023 review of submission by Serro03
This version of the article looks to address the previous comments while taking a minimalist (to-the-point) approach.

It would be highly appreciated to receive your feedback for this new version addressing all the previous issues.

Serro03 (talk) 14:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Please see your user talk page for important information. 331dot (talk) 14:53, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

17:47:19, 26 January 2023 review of submission by Youplanetec
I have some questions about the review.

First, I don't understand about the added sources being unreliable. Which ones are not reliable? Because most of them are from well known newspapers in Spain, do you mean the ones that are not about Iker Unzu specifically?

Second, the article I have written has not been copied from absolutely no web, on the contrary: Some time ago I wrote the first draft about Unzu and an unidentified user copied and pasted my information in another Wiki (External to Wikipedia: YouTube Wiki) thus stealing my article. I've the article code saved, his copy is badly done and contains errors because he did not copy and paste the article well when creating it in YouTube Wiki.

How can I improve the article/biography and what references should I delete to make it work?

Iker Unzu is a notable figure in Spain and I think he has the necessary articles/sources to be in Wikipedia, so I'll make the necessary changes to improve the article.

If necessary, I'll report the user who created the copied article on YouTube Wiki for copying.

I'd really appreciate your advice on how to improve it.

Youplanetec (talk) 17:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Youplanetec I think the issue is most of the sources are primary and YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, etc. are generally considered unreliable. The number of subscribers/followers is meaningless for notability.  What is needed is coverage about Iker Unzu (not interviews, his videos or his comments, etc.) written by reputable sources unaffiliated with him or not PR fluff pieces from marketing/SEO sites.  S0091 (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

21:34:04, 26 January 2023 review of submission by SeriousLemur
Hello Why my article draft was declined? Could someone do smth with this?

SeriousLemur (talk) 21:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I assume this is about Draft:Lyubov Chernikova. It lacked the submission information; looking at the history, the only time it was declined was when it was blank. You may resubmit it, but it's likely to be declined, because it is highly promotional in nature. The draft needs to be written with a neutral point of view, summarizing what independent reliable sources say about her, not merely documeting her work.  Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 21:43, 26 January 2023 (UTC)